VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

Sh Jay Singh v. The Joint Commissioner of Central Tax Gst Delhi & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
24 August 2026
Bench
Anil Kshetarpalauthor, Amit Mahajan
Case no.
W.P.(C) 12372/2026

Judgment

O R D E R %

24.08.2026

¶1The Petitioner claims to be engaged in executing works contract. He applied for registration under Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, and was granted registration on 07.06.2023.

¶2The Petitioner was issued Show Cause Notice ['SCN'] purposing cancellation of his GST Registration on the ground that he had failed to furnish/update his bank account details, as required under Rule 10A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017.

¶3The Petitioner claims that the e-mail address furnished at the time of registration belonged to his Chartered Accountant and that the SCN was only uploaded on the common portal. According to the Petitioner, he consequently remained unaware of the proceedings. Ultimately, by order dated 09.05.2024, his GST registration was This is a digitally signed order. cancelled. The Appeal preferred by the Petitioner on 02.09.2025 has subsequently been dismissed as barred by limitation vide order dated

28.07.2026.

¶4Learned counsel representing the Respondents submits that the Appeal was preferred much beyond the period within which the delay could have been condoned.

¶5It is evident that the Petitioner's GST registration was cancelled solely on account of his failure to furnish/update the requisite bank account details. The Petitioner claims to be carrying on business as a contractor and seeks restoration of his registration upon furnishing the requisite details. There is no allegation of fraud against the Petitioner.

¶6Keeping in view the aforesaid position, the Writ Petition is disposed of while directing provisional restoration of Petitioner's GST registration in order to enable him to furnish/upload the required documents within a period of one month. In the event the Petitioner furnishes the requisite documents/details within the aforesaid period and pays the penalty, if any, as may be lawfully imposed and communicated by the Respondents, his GST registration shall stand restored. In case of failure to comply with these conditions within the stipulated period, the order cancelling the Petitioner's GST registration shall stand revived.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

AMIT MAHAJAN, J. AUGUST 24, 2026/sp/ad This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010398352026 + W.P.(C) 12372/2026 and CM APPL. 57334/2026 SH JAY SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Kumar Jha, Adv. versus THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX GST DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gibran Naushad, SSC with Mr. Suraj Shekhar Singh, Mr. Hasan Haider, Mr. Anish Mishra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.