Meena Bazar Street Vendors and Hawkers Sangthan and Ors v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors

J U D G M E N T

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J. (OPEN COURT)

¶1The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, has been instituted on behalf of the petitioners, praying as follows:-

"In the facts and circumstances stated herein above, it is Most Respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:

I. Pass an order directing the respondents to allow the petitioner no. 2 to 24 to peacefully vend in terms of the Certificate of Vending issued to them.

II. Pass an Order directing the respondents to ensure that the petitioner no. 2 to 24 be allowed to peacefully vend on their vending sites i.e., On the Pavement, Near Jama Masjid Gate No. 2, Meena Bazar, City SP Zone, Ward-85-N without any hindrance being caused by any public official.

III. Pass an order directing the respondents, their officials, their agents etc. be restrained from harassing the petitioner no. 2 to 24 from peacefully vending at their vending sites.

IV. Pass an order directing the SHO, PS Jama Masjid to ensure that the petitioner street vendors shall be allowed to peacefully vend at their vending sites.

V. Pass an order directing the respondent MCD to correct the nomenclature in the column for Type of Vendor from "Others" to "Stationary Street Vendor" (in view of the Section 6 of the Act) as detailed in the vending certificates issued to the petitioner no. 2 to 24.

VI. Pass an order directing the TVC, City SP Zone to decide the representation dated 13.09.2023 made by the petitioner no. 2 to 24 for declaring them as a Stationary Street Vendor in terms of the Section 6 of the Act.

VII. Pass any such directions or order that this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the above-mentioned case."

¶2Issue notice.

¶3Ms. Puja Kalra, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), and Mr. Divyam Nandarajog, learned panel counsel appearing on behalf of the GNCTD accept notice.

¶4Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the MCD, has handed-up in the Court today, the terms and conditions, permitting the petitioners to vend. Let the same be taken on the record

¶5For the sake of completeness, the said terms and conditions attached to the Certificates of Vending are reproduced herein below:- "1. Vendor shall not have any other permanent or

long-term vending certificate.

¶2Vending certificate is non-transferable.

¶3It is mandatory for the vendor to follow the vending period and zone as determined by TVC or local body.

¶4Vendor shall not give his vending certificate on

rent in any way.

¶5Vendor shall not have any infectious disease.

¶6Vendor shall have to take care of hygiene on

vending place/zone and nearby area and also

take care of public health.

¶7Vendor shall display copy of vending certificate on his place/vending site and will produce original documents to TVC/concerned inspector whenever required.

¶8Vendor/Squatter shall insure that no hindrance be

caused to pedestrian and vehicular moment.

¶9Vendor shall not vend/sell any harmful, dangerous and polluted items. It should also be ensured that the quality of the products sold and services provided to the public conform to the prescribed standards of public health, hygienic conditions and safety.

¶10The street vendor shall not do any

unauthorized/illegal activity.

¶11Mobile vendors shall not stay or vend more than 30 minutes or time prescribed by the TVC at place in a vending/squatting zone.

¶12Vendors will not block footpaths and will not vend

on roads. Vendor should take care of space in

front of vending stalls/counters on footpath for

pedestrians.

¶13Vending certificate can be cancelled or suspended

on the basis of violations.

¶14Vendor shall not build or construct any kind of

permanent or temporary structure at vending site.

¶15Seller shall adopt health and hygiene conditions as

required by local laws and court orders.

¶16Vendor have to follow all the conditions mentioned in Delhi Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Scheme, 2019."

¶6In terms of the Certificates of Vending issued to the petitioners, it is clearly stipulated they cannot vend from any particular location, contrary to the express terms of Clause no. '11', of the said Certificates of Vending. It is further observed that since the Town Vending Committee (TVC) is yet to fix a time limit, providing for a period during which a vendor can vend from any particular spot, the stipulation of 30 minutes time contained in the said clause, is binding on the petitioners at this stage. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners states that they do not pray for the relief of running their business from any particular vending site, within the zone where they have been permitted to vend by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, and further, the solitary relief that is prayed for is to permit the

petitioners to vend, strictly in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Certificates of Vending, issued by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi.

¶7It is an admitted position that the Town Vending Committee (TVC), has in terms of the directions issued by this Court, from time to time, as well as, in terms of the mandate of Section 3 (Survey of street vendors and protection from eviction on relocation) and Section 4 (Issue of certificate of vending) of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, carried out a survey, in some of the areas under the MCD zones; pursuant to which, the petitioners have been issued Certificates of Vending, which are annexed as Annexure P-3, to the present writ petition.

S.NO. NAME OF THE STREET VENDORS DATE OF ISSUE OF VENDING CERTIFICATE

PLACE OF VENDING VENDING CERTIFICATE

(URI) CATEGORY OF THE COV ISSUED

¶1 Savitri

31.01.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 1140127 Others

¶2 Mohammad Haider Ali

31.01.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 4081880 Others

¶3 Mushtaq Ansari

31.01.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 2888053 Others

¶4 Mohd. Amiruddin

31.01.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 6653005 Others

¶5 Halima

31.01.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 9143197 Others

¶6 Jumman

31.01.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 9398853 Others

¶7 Md Mehrb Uddin

31.01.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 8910439 Others

¶8 Pradeep Kumar

31.01.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 5312616 Others

¶9 Hasibuddin

31.01.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 3767136 Others

¶10Mohd. Israr

31.01.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 3149933 Others

¶11Shivalak Sahni

31.01.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 9237493 Others

¶12Aas Mohammad

31.01.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 3758240 Others

¶13Shajid Alam

31.01.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 3926666 Others

¶14Mohammad Jaheer

31.01.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 2278955 Others

¶15Habibuddin

12.04.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 4942235 Others

¶16Balram Singh

31.01.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 4565192 Others

¶17Md Abdul Hakim Mondal

31.01.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 3625936 Others

¶18Yogesh Kumar Yadav

31.01.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 6404421 Others

¶19Md. Raja

31.01.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 4189604 Others

¶20Dhari Prasad

12.04.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 7577373 Others

¶21Iqbal Ahmad

31.01.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 5203984 Others

¶22Parvez Alam

31.01.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 9395542 Others

¶23Raj Pal Kashyap

31.01.2022 City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N 9943275 Others

¶8In view of the foregoing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioners, limits the relief in the present writ petition, to a direction to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, to permit the above-mentioned street vendors, to continue to vend within City-SP Zone, Ward-85-N, strictly and scrupulously in compliance with the terms and conditions of the said Certificates of Vending.

¶9In view of the above, the present writ petition is partly allowed; and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi is directed to permit the above-mentioned street vendors, to vend within their respective zones, subject to the terms and conditions, as specified in the Certificates of Vending, without any let or hindrance.

¶10Needless to state that, insofar as prayer clause V and VI are concerned, the petitioners will be at liberty to prosecute their representations and articulate any difficulties faced by them, before the appropriate authorities, in accordance with law, in relation to the certificate of vending, insofar as it employs the expression "Others".

¶11No further directions are prayed for.

¶12With the above directions, the present writ petition is partly allowed; and disposed of accordingly.

¶13A copy of this judgment be uploaded on the website of this Court, forthwith.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL (JUDGE)

ANISH DAYAL (JUDGE)

SEPTEMBER 22, 2023 Aanchal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered On: 22.09.2023 MEENA BAZAR STREET VENDORS AND HAWKERS SANGTHAN AND ORS ..... Petitioners Versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS .... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Aditya, Mr. Anjani Kumar Mishra & Mr. Bhibhuti Bhushan Mishra, Advocates. For the Respondents : Ms. Puja Kalra, Standing Counsel for MCD with Mr. Virendra Singh, Advocate. Mr. Divyam Nandrajog, Panel Counsel GNCTD with Mr. Jatin Dua, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL