VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2023 › High Court of Delhi

Apnatime Tech Private Limited and Anr v. Apna Hr Consultancy and Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
27 July 2023
Bench
C. Hari Shankarauthor
Case no.
CS(COMM) 554/2021

Judgment

O R D E R (ORAL) %

27.07.2023

¶2The terms of settlement read thus: "1. The Defendants agree and undertake not to use either directly or indirectly the mark and/or APNA, with or without the prefix HR, and/or any mark identical or deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs' trade marks, in a manner as may amount to passing off the Defendants' services and business as those of the Plaintiff. The, Defendants agree not to file any application for registering the mark 'APNA' (word or device mark) and/ or any other similar mark thereto before the Trademark Registry in respect of human resource consultancy

and recruitment services, services related to training and educational and related services which would result in violation of the Plaintiffs' rights in the trademark APNA.

¶2The Defendants agree to cancel/withdraw its pending trademark application under number 4838351, dated 28th

¶3The Defendants agree and undertake to cease using and operating the domain name January 2021 in class 35 and file necessary applications/letters with the Trademark Registry within 14 (fourteen) days from the date of execution of this Settlement Agreement and provide proof of the same to the Plaintiffs.

www.apnahr.in and transfer the same to the Plaintiffs without consideration within a period of 15 (fifteen) days from the date of signing this Settlement Agreement.

¶4The Plaintiffs shall make an appropriate application for deletion of the name of Defendant No.1 from the array of parties on or before recording the terms of this Settlement Agreement before the Hon'ble Court.

¶5In view of this Settlement Agreement, the Plaintiffs do not press for other monetary reliefs as claimed in the said Suit."

¶3Learned Counsel for the parties agree, on behalf of their respective clients, to abide by the terms of settlement.

¶4The Court has perused the terms of settlement and find them to be in order and enforceable.

¶5As such, nothing survives for adjudication in the present suit.

¶6The suit accordingly stands decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 27 April 2023.

¶7Both parties shall remain bound by the terms of settlement as reproduced hereinabove.

¶8The plaintiffs shall be entitled to refund of 50% court fees, if any, deposited by it.

¶9Let a decree sheet be drawn up by the Registry accordingly.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

JULY 27, 2023

dsn

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + APNATIME TECH PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Diva Arora Menon, Adv. Versus APNA HR CONSULTANCY AND ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Pritika Juneja, Mr. Anshul Saurastri, Mr. Minesh Andharia, Mr. Jay Shah, Advs. for D-2 and 5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR 1. Learned Counsel for the parties submits ad idem that the dispute in this present case stands settled by way of settlement agreement dated 27 April 2023 drawn up under the aegis of the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, which is on record.

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.