- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 24 August 2026
- Bench
- Madhu Jain
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 6167/2023
Judgment
O R D E R %
31.08.2026
¶1This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CRL.M.A. 26579/2026
¶2Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. 26578/2026
¶3The present application has been filed by the Petitioner under Section 403 read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the 'BNSS'), seeking rectification of the order dated
11.08.2026.
¶4Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that in the order dated
11.08.2026, the appearance on behalf of the Petitioner has inadvertently been recorded as "Mr. Shri Singh, Sr. Adv. along with Mr. Gautam Khazanchi, Ms. Namrata Sandhnani, Mr. Ayush Sachan, Advs.", whereas Mr. Rohit Gupta, This is a digitally signed order. Advocate had appeared and addressed arguments on behalf of the Petitioner.
¶5Accordingly, the appearance on behalf of the Petitioner in the order dated 11.08.2026 shall be read as "Mr. Rohit Gupta, Advocate" in place of the appearance presently recorded therein. The order dated 11.08.2026 stands corrected to the aforesaid extent.
¶6The application is allowed and disposed of accordingly.
¶7The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. MADHU JAIN, J AUGUST 31, 2026/prg/m This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010335572023 + CRL.M.C. 6167/2023 AMANPREET KAUR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Gupta, Adv. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.