- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 24 August 2026
- Bench
- Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 1726/2024
Judgment
O R D E R %
24.08.2026
¶1As of now, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not in touch with the petitioner and has no instructions.
¶2Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that the period of externment has already been completed.
¶3In view of the aforesaid, nothing remains to be adjudicated. Even otherwise, if learned counsel for the petitioner has instructions to press this petition, liberty is granted to file an application seeking restoration of the same within 30 days from today. This is a digitally signed order. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the petition, along with pending applications, stands disposed of. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J AUGUST 24, 2026 aks This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010332212024 + W.P.(CRL) 1726/2024 and CRL.M.A. 16845/2024, CRL.M.A. 38656/2024 PARDEEP VATS .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Mudita Sharda, Ms. Gayatri Nandwani and Mr. Adrian Abbi, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC with Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Advocate for State. SI Aarti Yadav, PS Kapashera. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.