- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 17 August 2023
- Bench
- Siddharth Mridul, Anish Dayal
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 10603/2023
Judgment
J U D G M E N T
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J. (OPEN COURT)
¶1The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been instituted on behalf of the petitioners, praying as follows:- "In the facts and circumstances stated herein above, it is Most Respectfully prayed that this Hon"ble Court may graciously be pleased to:
I. Pass an order directing the respondents to
allow the petitioners to peacefully vend in
terms of the Certificate of Vending issued
to them.
II. Pass an Order directing the respondents to
ensure that the petitioners be allowed to
peacefully vend on their vending sites i.e.,
On the Footpath, Esplande Road, Cycle
Market, Photo Market, City SP Zone,
Ward-84-N, New Delhi without any
hindrance being caused by any public
official.
III. Pass an order directing the respondents,
their officials, their agents etc. be
restrained from harassing the petitioners
from peacefully vending at their vending
sites.
IV. Pass an order directing the respondent
MCD to correct the nomenclature in the
column for Type of Vendor from "Others"
to "Stationary Street Vendor" (in view of
the Section 6 of the Act) as detailed in the
vending certificates issued to the
petitioners.
V. Pass an order for quashing and setting
aside the terms of certificate of vending
printed at the back side of the vending
certificate to the extent which is not
applicable to a stationary street vendor.
VI. Pass an order directing the TVC, City SP
Zone to decide the representation dated
07.08.2023 made by the petitioners for
declaring them as a Stationary Street
Vendor in terms of the Section 6 of the Act.
VII. Pass any such directions or order that this
Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the f
acts and circumstances of the above-
mentioned case."
¶2Issue notice.
¶3Mr. Puneet Yadav, learned Additional Standing Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No. 1/MCD and Mr. Abhinav Garg, learned Panel Counsel, GNCTD, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent Nos. 3 and 4/SHO, P.S.: Kashmere Gate.
¶4Learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the MCD, has invited our attention to the terms and conditions, permitting the petitioners to vend.
¶5For the sake of completeness, the said terms and conditions attached to the Certificate of Vending, are reproduced herein below:-
"1. Vendor shall not have any other permanent
or long-term vending certificate.
¶2Vending certificate is non-transferable.
¶3It is mandatory for the vendor to follow the
vending period and zone as determined by
TVC or local body.
¶4Vendor shall not give his vending
certificate on rent in any way.
¶5Vendor shall not have any infectious
disease.
¶6Vendor shall have to take care of hygiene
on vending place/zone and nearby area
and also take care of public health.
¶7Vendor shall display copy of vending
certificate on his place/vending site and
will produce original documents to
TVC/concerned inspector whenever
required.
¶8Vendor/Squatter shall insure that no
hindrance be caused to pedestrian and
vehicular moment.
¶9Vendor shall not vend/sell any harmful,
dangerous and polluted items. It
should also be ensured that the
quality of the products sold and
services provided to the public conform to
the prescribed standards of public
health, hygienic conditions and
safety.
¶10The street vendor shall not do any
unauthorized/illegal activity.
¶11Mobile vendors shall not stay or vend
more than minutes or time
prescribed by the TVC at place in a
vending/squatting zone.
¶12Vendors will not block footpaths and will
not vend on roads. Vendor should take care
of space in front of vending stalls/counters
on footpath for pedestrians.
¶13Vending certificate can be cancelled or
suspended on the basis of violations.
¶14Vendor shall not build or construct any
kind of permanent or temporary structure
at vending site.
¶15Seller shall adopt health and hygiene
conditions as required by local laws and
court orders.
¶16Vendor have to follow all the conditions
mentioned in Delhi Street Vendors
(Protection of Livelihood and
Regulation of Street Vending) Scheme,
2019."
¶6In terms of the Certificates of Vending issued to the petitioners, it is clearly stipulated that they cannot vend from any particular location, contrary to the express terms of Clause no. '11', of the said Certificates of Vending. It is further observed that since the Town Vending Committee (TVC) is yet to fix a time limit, providing for a period, during which vendors can vend from any particular spot, the stipulation of 30 minutes time, contained in the said clause, is binding on the petitioners, at this stage. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners states, that they do not pray for the relief of running their business from any particular vending site, within the zone where they have been permitted to vend by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi.
¶7It is an admitted position that the Town Vending Committee
(TVC), has in terms of the directions issued by this Court, from time to
time, as well as, in terms of the mandate of Section 3 (Survey of street vendors and protection from eviction on relocation) and Section 4 (Issue of certificate of vending) of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, carried out a survey, in some of the areas under the MCD zones; pursuant to which, the following petitioners have been issued certificates of vending, which are annexed as Annexure P-3, to the present writ petition.
S.NO. NAME OF THE STREET VENDORS DATE OF ISSUE OF VENDING CERTIFICAT E
PLACE OF VENDING VENDING CERTIFIC ATE (URI) CATEGORY OF THE COV ISSUED Mr. Triloki Nath
28.02.2022
City-SP Zone, Ward-84-N 8799043 Others Mr. Sakaldev Yadav
07.11.2021 City-SP Zone, Ward-84-N 5579650 Others Mr. Annrag Jain
07.11.2021 City-SP Zone, Ward-84-N 5038352 Others Mr. Pawan Kumar
07.11.2021 City-SP Zone, Ward-84-N 1148727 Others Mr. Anup Sharma
07.11.2021 City-SP Zone, Ward-84-N 4010249 Others Mr. Pankaj Bansal
07.11.2021 City-SP Zone, Ward-84-N 9320783 Others Mr. Dhaniram Kanojia
07.11.2021 City-SP Zone, Ward-84-N 6117686 Others Mr. Rajdev Ram
07.11.2021 City-SP Zone, Ward-84-N 6582246 Others
Mr. Chhote Lal
07.11.2021 City-SP Zone, Ward-84-N 5990748 Others
¶8In view of the foregoing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, categorically limits the relief in the present writ petition, i.e. a direction to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, to permit the aforesaid petitioners to continue to vend within City-SP Zone, Ward-84-N, strictly and scrupulously in compliance with the terms and conditions of the said certificates of vending, particularly Clause no. 11, and in accordance with law.
¶9In view of the above, the present writ petition is partly allowed; and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi is directed to permit the petitioners to vend within City-SP Zone, Ward-84-N, subject to the terms and conditions of the aforementioned certificates of vending dated
28.02.2022, 07.11.2021, without any let or hindrance.
¶10Needless to state that the petitioners will be at liberty to articulate the difficulties faced by them, before the appropriate authorities, in accordance with law, in relation to the certificates of vending, insofar as it employs the expression "Others".
¶11No further directions are prayed for.
¶12With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
¶13A copy of this judgment be uploaded on the website of this Court forthwith.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
(JUDGE)
ANISH DAYAL
(JUDGE) AUGUST 17, 2023/rs
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Case details
Parties and counsel
#S-9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered On: 17.08.2023 W.P.(C) 10603/2023 TRILOKI NATH AND ORS . .... Petitioners Versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS...Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr. Aditya, Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra and Mr. Anjani Kumar Mishra, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Puneet Yadav, ASC for R-1/MCD. Mr. Abhinav Garg, Panel Counsel, GNCTD along with Mr. Nishant Goyal and Mr. Mihir Gujjewar, Advocates for R-3 and R-4/SHO, P.S.: Kashmere Gate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.