- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 2 August 2023
- Bench
- Rajiv Shakdher, Girish Kathpalia
- Case no.
- ITA 420/2023
Judgment
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL): CM No.39039/2023 in ITA No. 420/2023 CM No.39067/2023 in ITA No. 421/2023
¶1Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CM No.39040/2023 in ITA No.420/2023 & CM No. 39068/2023 in ITA
No. 421/2023 [Applications filed on behalf of the appellant/revenue seeking condonation of delay of 60 days in re filing the appeals]
¶2These are the applications moved on behalf of the appellant/revenue, seeking condonation of delay in re-filing the appeals.
2.1 It is the appellant/revenue's contention that there is a delay of 60 days in re-filing, qua the above-captioned appeals.
¶3Mr Rohan Khare, learned counsel, who appears on behalf of the respondent/assessee, says that he has no objection if the court were to condone the delay in re-filing.
¶4It is ordered accordingly.
¶5The above-captioned applications are disposed of.
¶6These appeals concern Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16 [ITA 420/2021] and AY 2016-17 [ITA 421/2023].
¶7Via these appeals, the appellant/revenue seeks to assail the order dated
31.10.2022, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short, "Tribunal"] in MA Nos. 276/Del/2022, SA No.128/Del/2022 & MA No. 277/Del/2022, SA No.129/Del/2022.
¶8It is correctly pointed out by the counsel for the parties that in ITA No. 338/2023, which was preferred by the appellant/revenue in the respondent/assessee's case concerning AY 2017-18, this Court had closed the appeal, and granted liberty to the appellant/revenue to file a writ petition, in view of the judgment of the Full Bench of this Court dated 06.08.2010, passed in a bunch of appeals, including ITA 724/2010, titled Lachman Dass Bhatia Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax.
¶9It is ordered accordingly, in the above-captioned appeals as well.
¶10The above-captioned appeals are closed, with liberty to the appellant/revenue to prefer a writ petition.
¶11Parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.
RAJIV SHAKDHER JUDGE
GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGE AUGUST 2, 2023/RY
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:02.08.2023 + ITA 420/2023 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2 ..... Appellant Through: Mr Sanjay Kumar, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Easha Kadian and Ms Hemlata Rawat, Advocates. versus L.G. ELECTRONICS INC. KOREA ..... Respondent Through: Mr Rohan Khare, Adv. + ITA 421/2023 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2 ..... Appellant Through: Mr Sanjay Kumar, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Easha Kadian and Ms Hemlata Rawat, Advocates. versus L.G. ELECTRONICS INC. KOREA ..... Respondent Through: Mr Rohan Khare, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.