Subodh Kumar (Ex Cpl-786978-R) v. Union of India & Ors

JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

¶1Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

¶2With the consent of the parties, petition is taken up for final disposal today itself.

¶3Petitioner seeks grant of pro-rata pension from the date of his discharge with all consequential benefits. Learned counsel for petitioner relies on judgment of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 08.02.2021 in W.P. (C) 9905/2019, titled Surendra Pal Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors. From the said judgment it is clear that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the factual as well as legal matrix of Surendra Pal Singh (supra).

¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner in this petition claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

¶5Learned counsel for the petitioner, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) had been given.

¶6Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.

¶7Accordingly, the petition is disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioner to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions (supra), to grant him the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioner. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioner, for any reason, is not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions (supra) being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioner, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioner shall be entitled to take further remedies there against. Needless to state that if any documents are asked for by the respondents, the same shall be furnished by the petitioner within a week.

¶8If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.

¶9Petition is allowed in the above terms. o o

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

MANOJ JAIN, J , JULY 27, 2023 NA o14:39:27 o

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 27.07.2023 + W.P. (C) 9868/2023 & CM. APPL. 37954/2023 SUBODH KUMAR (EX CPL-786978-R) .... PETITIONER Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr. Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Manish Kumar, Senior Panel Counsel with Mr. Ravindra Vikram, Advocates. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN