- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 15 November 2011
- Bench
- M.L. Mehta
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 649/2011
Judgment
ORDER o/o
15.11.2011 The parties are present. The petitionersare identifiedby his counsel and the respondent no.2 Ramesh Chand is identified by I.O. This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 102/2005 PS Nand Nagri under Sec. 3(II)(X) SC ST Act and under Sec. 324/325/506/34 IPG on account of a compronnise between the petitioners and the respondent No.2 Ramesh Ghand. The respondent present states that he has got the matter settled with the petitioners out of his own free will. Since the parties are neighbours and respondent no.2 Ramesh Ghand has compromised with the petitioner, no useful purpose will be served by continuing with the FIR No. 102/2005 PS Nand Nagri. Gonsequently,FIR No. 102/2005 PS Nand Nagri under Sec. 3(II)(X) SG ST Act and under Sec. 324/325/506/34 IPG and the proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed. The petition stands disposed of. NOVEMBER 15, 2011 'raj' M.L. MEHTA, 3 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
Case details
Parties and counsel
/ k * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 649/2011 JAGAN PRASAD & ORS Petitioner Through I^r. Harish Kumar, Advocate versus STATE & ORS Respondent Through Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP with SI Dharmendra, PS Nand Nagri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.