Narola Jungshi & Anr v. Iffco Tokio Insurance Co. Ltd &Ors

SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral)

¶1The present appeal is for enhancement of the compensation amount of Rs.2,90,000/- which was awarded by the learned Tribunal in Suit No. 50/11 passed in a claim petition preferred under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988(the Act).

¶2The only ground of challenge raised by the learned counsel for the appellants is that though the claim petition was filed by the appellants/claimants U/s 163-A of the Act, however, the learned Tribunal has granted compensation as per Section 166 of the Act and that the multiplier has to be applied as per the age of the deceased and not as per the age of the claimant.

¶3In view of the above, the present case is covered by a judgment of this Court in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Pitamber & Ors., (MAC.APP.304/2009) decided on 23.01.2012. This Court referred to the decision in Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Smt. Pataso & Ors., MAC APP.962/2005 decided on 01.09.2008; Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Om Prakash & Ors., 1 (2009) ACC 148; Jagdish & Anr. Vs. Madhav Raj Mishra and Anr. MAC APP.190/2011 decided on 19.04.2011; and Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Anita Devi & Ors., 20011

(5) AD (Delhi) 138, decided on 10.05.2011; Oriental Insurance Company Vs. Hansrajbhai Vs. Kodala, (2001) 5 SCC 175; and Deepal Girishbhai Soni Vs. United India Insurance Company Limited, (2004) 5 SCC 385; and held that in a petition under Section 163-A of the Act there is a cap of Rs.40,000/- on the annual income and the compensation including non-pecuniary damages have to be awarded as per the Second Schedule.

¶4Hence, the loss of dependency comes to Rs.4,53,333/-(Rs.40,000/- X 2/3 X 17).

¶5The compensation awarded towards funeral expenses as Rs.10,000/- is not consistence with the Second Schedule. Therefore, the Appellants are entitled to a sum of Rs.2,000/- towards funeral expenses. Since the present appeal is being decided U/s 163-A of the Act, therefore, appellants are also entitled for compensation of Rs.2,500/- towards loss of Estate. I grant accordingly.

¶6In view of the above, the overall compensation comes to Rs.4,57,833/-.

¶7The enhanced compensation of Rs.1,67,833/- (Rs.4,57,833 – Rs.2,90,000) shall carry interest @ 9% per annum from the date of the filing of the petition till its payment.

¶8The Respondent No.1/National Insurance Company Ltd. is directed to deposit the enhanced amount of Rs.1,67,833/- along with interest with the Registrar General of this Court within six weeks from today. On deposit, the enhanced compensation shall be released in favour of the claimants.

¶9The Appeal is allowed in above terms.

SURESH KAIT, J. AUGUST 01, 2013 sb

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 1st August, 2013 + NAROLA & OTRS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate. Versus IFFCO TOKIO INS. & OTRS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. R.K.Raizada for Ms.Suman Bagga, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT