Vandana Paul v. Union of India & Ors

JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

¶1Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to combatise the post of the petitioner i.e. Pharmacist with pay and rank at par with his batchmates with all consequential benefits in a timebound manner.

¶2Learned counsel submits that petitioner had given a representation to the said effect in the year 2018. However, till date he has not received the response to the same.

¶3Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

W.P(C) 9577/2023

¶4Learned counsel for the respondent submits that petitioner be permitted to file a fresh representation and in case a representation is received, the respondent shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks.

¶5In view of the above, this petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file a fresh detailed representation. On such a representation being filed, the respondent shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of the representation.

¶6The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

¶7Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

MANOJ JAIN, J JULY 20, 2023 'rs'

W.P(C) 9577/2023 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 20.07.2023 + W.P.(C) 9577/2023 VANDANA PAUL ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant: Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava and Mr. S.B. Sinha, Advocates For the Respondents: Mr. Udai Raj Khanna, Senior Panel Counsel with Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, (GP) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN