VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2024 › High Court of Delhi

Mohan Lal Katyal v. Pooja

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
13 November 2024
Bench
Tara Vitasta Ganjuauthor
Case no.
RC.REV. 130/2024

Judgment

O R D E R %

13.11.2024

¶1Mr. Ganish Katyal, a legal representative of the Petitioner appears through video conferencing.

¶2The Respondent also appears through video conferencing.

¶3Learned Counsel for the parties submit that the parties have reached a settlement that Petitioner shall vacate the premises i.e. Shop No. 9 and 10 on ground floor of Property bearing No. A-4/27, Krishna Nagar, Delhi-110051 [hereinafter referred to as "subject Premises"] on or before 31.01.2025.

¶4During the interregnum period, the payment which has been deposited by the Petitioner/tenant before the learned Trial Court shall be withdrawn and deposited in the bank account of the Respondent/landlord within two weeks by the Petitioner/tenant.

4.1 For this purpose, the details of the bank account shall be provided by the learned Counsel for the Respondent/landlord to the learned Counsel for the Petitioner/tenant on his email address within two days.

¶5In consideration of the aforegoing, the Respondent/landlord agrees to forego monthly user charges. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶6Let an Undertaking by way of an Affidavit be filed by the Petitioner/tenant, within a period of three weeks undertaking that:

(i) The vacant, physical and peaceful possession of the subject Premises will be handed over by the Petitioner/tenant to the Respondent/landlord on or before 31.01.2025;

(ii) The Petitioner/tenant undertakes and confirms that the entire subject Premises are under their occupation and control;

(iii) The Petitioner/tenant will pay all the utility bills such as electricity and water and any other dues, for the subject Premises till the date of handing over of the vacant, physical and peaceful possession thereof;

(iv) The Petitioner/tenant undertakes that they will not create any third party rights or part with possession of the subject Premises and that they shall not damage the subject Premises in any manner whatsoever prior to its vacation;

(v) The Petitioner/tenant shall remain bound by the aforesaid Undertaking.

¶7An advance copy of the Undertaking shall be served on the Respondent/landlord.

¶8Subject to the Petitioner/tenant filing the aforegoing Undertaking before this Court within two weeks from today, execution of order dated

08.12.2023 passed in RC ARC 8/2020 [hereinafter referred to as the "Eviction Order"] shall remain stayed.

¶9In the event that the Petitioner/tenant defaults in complying with the terms of the Undertaking filed, the interim protection granted hereinabove shall automatically stand dissolved and Respondent/landlord will be at liberty to take recourse to appropriate proceedings for recovery of The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. possession and for recovery of the use and occupation charges from the Petitioner/tenant at market rate the period from the date of the Eviction Order, in accordance with law.

¶10Accordingly, the Petition and all pending Applications stands disposed of in terms of the settlement above between the parties.

¶11Both parties undertake to abide by the terms of the settlement entered into before the Court.

¶12List for compliance on 10.12.2024.

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J NOVEMBER 13, 2024/ ha

Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 130/2024, CM APPL. 27201/2024 & CM APPL. 62531/2024 MOHAN LAL KATYAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Sharma, Advocate. versus POOJA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.