- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 1 September 2026
- Bench
- Om Prakash Shukla
- Case no.
- ARB.P. 988/2026
Judgment
JUDGMENT(ORAL) %
01.09.2026
¶1Both the parties are ad idem with respect to reference of the disputes to arbitration. In the aforesaid circumstances, this Court finds no impediment in appointing a Sole Arbitrator.
¶2It is trite that at the referral stage, this Court is only concerned with the existence of a valid arbitration agreement inter se the parties herein.
¶3In the present case, there is no dispute with regard to the existence of a valid arbitration clause between the parties.
¶4Accordingly, Mr. Amit, Advocate-on-record (Mob. No. 8800120004) is appointed as a learned Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arisen between the parties. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall enter upon the reference within three weeks from today.
Signed By:ANUBHAV TRIPATHI
ARB.P. 988/2026
¶5The learned Sole Arbitrator will proceed to the arbitration proceedings subject to furnishing requisite disclosures as required under Section 12(2) of the Act within three weeks of entering reference.
¶6The arbitration shall be carried under the rules and aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre ("DIAC"). The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the DIAC.
¶7It shall be open to the parties to raise all pleas, including objection as to arbitrability and jurisdiction, before the learned Sole Arbitrator who shall decide the same in accordance with law.
¶8It is clarified that the observations made herein are only for the purpose of deciding the present petition under Section 11(6) of the Act. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall adjudicate the disputes with claims and counter claims independently and on their own merits, uninfluenced by any observations contained in the present order.
¶9The Registry is directed to send a receipt of this order to Mr. Amit, learned Arbitrator through all permissible modes including email.
¶10Accordingly, the present petitions are disposed of in the above terms.
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J SEPTEMBER 1, 2026/at
Signed By:ANUBHAV TRIPATHI
Case details
Parties and counsel
ARB.P. 988/2026 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010250692026 + ARB.P. 988/2026, I.A. 15479/2026 CHANDRASEN SINGH PROPRIETOR SUNSHINE FINISHES .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Mund, Mr. Vedant Mund, Advs. versus M/S BPTP LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vivek Raja, Mr. Achin Nayak and Mr. Aakash Dalal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.