VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

Nitin Kumar & Ors v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
21 August 2026
Bench
Girish Kathpaliaauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 4092/2026

Judgment

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

¶1Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 499/2022 of PS Khajuri Khas for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no. 2) has settled the disputes with the petitioners.

¶2State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,

2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.08.21 17:30:41 +05'30'

CRL.M.C. 4092 /2026

Page 2 of 2 pages

¶3The respondent no.2 is present in court today and is identified by IO/SI Abhishek. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all disputes with the petitioners. Marriage between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 stands already dissolved by way of decree of divorce. One girl child namely Hanika aged 08 years and was born from wedlock of petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 and is residing with respondent no.2. The respondent no.2 submits that she has received complete full and final settlement amount in lieu of her entire stridhan and maintenance. Respondent no.2 submits that now she does not wish to continue prosecution of petitioners.

¶4Having spoken with respondent no.2, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through full dress trial.

¶5Therefore, the petition is allowed and FIR No. 499/2022 of PS Khajuri Khas for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act as well as proceedings arising out of the same are quashed.

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) AUGUST 21, 2026/as GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,

2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4a fec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626ca cca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5 d15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c4879 65ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.08.21 17:30:30 +05'30'

Case details

Parties and counsel

CRL.M.C. 4092 /2026 Page 1 of 2 pages * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 21.08.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010235412026 + CRL.M.C. 4092/2026 NITIN KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Chaman Sharma and Mr. Dharam Prakash, Advocates with petitioners in person versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with SI Abhishek Mr. R.C. Anand, Advocate for R2 with R2 in person CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.