Benetton India Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-4(2), New Delhi

O R D E R %

24.08.2026

¶1Mr. Piyush Kaushik, learned counsel for the petitioner, accepts that appeal effect has been given. He, however, points out that it has been given only half an hour ago and not on the previous date of hearing i.e. 27.07.2026, as was informed by Mr. Vipul Agrawal, learned senior standing counsel for the respondent.

¶2Be that as it may. Since the appeal effect has been given, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Assessing Officer/Competent Authority to credit the amount in petitioner's bank account latest by 15.09.2026. In case, any order is proposed to be passed by the Competent Authority under Section 245 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in This is a digitally signed order. case any demand is outstanding against the petitioner, the same be passed in accordance with law, within fifteen days.

DINESH MEHTA, J.

RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J. AUGUST 24, 2026/kk This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010230572026 + W.P.(C) 7087/2026 BENETTON INDIA PVT. LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Adv. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(2), NEW DELHI. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vipul Agrawal, SSC with Ms.Harshita Kotru & Mr. Gaoraang Ranjan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA