VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2020 › High Court of Delhi

Wg Cdr Punita Aswal v. Union of India & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
5 October 2020
Bench
Rajiv Sahai Endlawauthor, Asha Menon
Case no.
W.P.(C) 4133/2020

Judgment

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

ASHA MENON, J. OCTOBER 05, 2020 'gsr'..

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 5th October, 2020 + WG. CDR. PUNITA ASWAL .... PETITIONER Through: Mr. Nikhil Palli, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, CGSC with Ms. Kinjal Shrivastava & Mr. Varun Kishore, Advs. for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON [VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING] JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW 1. The petition impugns the common order dated 20th February, 2020 of the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT), Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.1500/2019 preferred by the petitioner as well as in OAs preferred by six others, upholding the preliminary objection of the respondents Indian Air Force (IAF) to the OA No.1500/2019 preferred by the petitioner as well as in OAs preferred by six others. 2. This petition came up first before this Court on 13th July, 2020 when it was adjourned to 31st July, 2020. However on 31st July, 2020, the petition could not be listed and was listed only on 22nd September, 2020, when after hearing the counsels, it was adjourned to today. 3. It is the case of the petitioner, that (i) the petitioner joined the respondents IAF, after being selected as a Short Service Commissioned (SSC) officer, in the AE(L) branch, pursuant to the advertisements issued in October, 2005; (ii) the petitioner was finally commissioned on 3rd July, 2006, under the Rationalized Scheme of 10+4 years; (iii) initially, women were not recruited in IAF; IAF started commissioning women in different branches, in the years 1991 and 1992 and that too, on Short Service Commission, but did not consider them for permanent commission; (iv) various other women SSC officers approached this Court, seeking a direction to the respondents IAF to consider their case for grant of permanent commission, without any gender bias; (v) the aforesaid batch of petitions were allowed by this Court vide judgment dated 12th March, 2010 reported as Babita Puniya Vs. Secretary (2010) 168 DLT 115 (DB), holding that women SSC officers are entitled to permanent commission at par with male SSC officers, with all consequential benefits; (vi) the said judgment was upheld by the Supreme Court in judgment reported as The Secretary, Ministry of Defence Vs. Babita Puniya AIR 2020 SC 1000; (vii) after the aforesaid judgments, the petitioner, whose selection process had commissioned in October, 2005, was hopeful that she will be granted permanent commission on the same parameters on which male SSC officers in other branches had all along been granted permanent commission; (viii) the respondents IAF also issued a Policy dated 19th November, 2010, to grant permanent commission to all SSC women officers; (ix) the respondents IAF however, instead of considering the petitioner for permanent commission, after the petitioner had completed ten years as a SSC officer, vide signal dated 11th March, 2016 granted extension of four years to the petitioner even though the petitioner even then was willing for grant of permanent commission and was entitled thereto; (x) aggrieved therefrom the petitioner made a representation dated 20th January, 2017, but to no avail and therefore the petitioner preferred OA No.990/2017 before the AFT, assailing the action of the respondents IAF, of not considering the petitioner for permanent commission, on the premise that the petitioner had been commissioned prior to 26th September, 2008; (xi) the aforesaid reasoning of the respondents IAF was erroneous as the petitioner had been recruited prior to 25th May, 2006 and was entitled to be considered for permanent commission in terms of judgment of this Court in Babita Puniya supra; (xii) during the pendency of OA No.990/2017, the respondents IAF issued a new Policy dated 16th January, 2019, and in view whereof the petitioner withdrew OA No.990/2017 with liberty to challenge the action of the respondents IAF by filing a fresh OA; (xiii) the petitioner thereafter preferred OA No.1500

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.