Lakshmi v. Stat (Nct of Delhi) & Ors

O R D E R %

08.11.2016

Husband of the petitioner has been missing since 30.08.2015. As per the status report, the missing person has spoken to Inspector Subash Chandra, which was a video call and the conversation has been recorded in which the missing person stated that he has been residing at some place and will not come to Delhi. He also stated that he has fear of his life from the petitioner and her family members at Delhi. He further stated that he has been residing in a safe manner and has refused to come to Delhi. In view thereof, the learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition and submits that the petitioner will seek such remedies as are available in accordance with the law.

The present petition is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.

G.S.SISTANI, J

VINOD GOEL, J NOVEMBER 08, 2016 pst /

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 227/2016 LAKSHMI ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Bharat Bhushan Bhatia, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Tushar Sannu, Advocate for the State along with SI Sonu Singh, P.S. Ghazipur. Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, Advocate for respondents no.5 and 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL