Muzaffar Ahmad and Anr v. Union of India and Anr

ORDER (ORAL) %

18.11.2024

C. HARI SHANKAR, J

¶1Mr. Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioners, draws our attention to para 11 of the impugned order, which reads as under:

"11. In the conspectus of the discussions in the foregoing paragraphs, we dismiss the O.A. and grant liberty to the applicants to seek leave of the Tribunal for reviving the O.A. after the final outcome of SLP No.7365/2015 in the Hon'ble Supreme Court. No order as to costs."

¶2He submits that, after the impugned order was passed, SLP No. 7365/2015 has been dismissed by the Supreme Court and that, therefore, the petitioners would be moving the Tribunal seeking revival of the OA in accordance with liberty granted by para 11 of the impugned order (supra).

W.P.(C) 6318/2022

¶3He accordingly seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to re-approach the Court should any grievance arise after the OA is decided.

¶4Leave and liberty is granted as aforesaid. The petition is disposed of.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J.

NOVEMBER 18, 2024/v

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

W.P.(C) 6318/2022 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6318/2022 MUZAFFAR AHMAD AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra and Mr. Avinash Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Baliyan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA