Hoti Singh & Ors v. Indian Institute of Technology Delhi and Ors

O R D E R %

17.11.2025

¶1Learned senior counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that while arguing the matter it is revealed that challenge to decision dated

05.04.2022 is necessitated being against the statutory provision.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh. However, the prayer is that the interim protection granted during the pendency of this petition be continued for three weeks from today.

¶3In view of the limited prayer made, learned counsel for the respondents is not in a position to raise a serious objection, submission is that liberty be granted to the respondents to proceed against the petitioner This is a digitally signed order. for disciplinary/department proceedings if so necessitated.

¶4The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. All pending applications stand dismissed.

¶5It is clarified that the interim protection shall not act as an impediment for respondents for initiating other proceedings against the petitioners.

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J NOVEMBER 17, 2025/sr/ha

This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6203/2022, CM APPL. 18668/2022 & CM APPL. 21493/2023 HOTI SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, Sr. Adv, Mr. Siddhant Buxy & Mr. Vansh Verma, Advs. versus INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Banga, Sr. Panel Counsel with Mr. Sandeep Chaudhary, Advs. Mr. Arjun Mitra & Ms. Jayanti Jha, Advs. for R1 to R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN