VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2012 › High Court of Delhi

Mohd.Ahmed v. State

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
2 March 2012
Bench
Mx. Mehtaauthor
Case no.
BAIL APPLN. 127/2011

Judgment

ORDER

02.03.2012 These petitions are filed under Section 438 CrPC for anticipatory bail. Heard counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State. The petitioners are under protection of arrest for more than a year and have admittedly joined the investigation as and when called by the Investigating Officer. The challan has still not been filed. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, the petitioners in the event of arrest, shall be admitted on bail on their furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/InvestigatingOfficer/SHO and subject to the condition that petitioners shall continue to join the investigation as and when called by the Investigating Officer. Petitions stand disposed of. MARCH 02,2012 aM

Case details

Parties and counsel

-5© $-13 & 14 * IN THE fflGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 69/2011 MOHD. FEROZ & ANR. Petitioner Through: Mr. F.Haq,Advocate. versus % STATE With Respondent Through; Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. BAIL APPLN. 127/2011 MOHD .AHMED Petitioner Through: Mr.F.Haq, Advocate. STATE versus Respondent Through:, Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MX. MEHTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.