- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 10 November 2017
- Bench
- Jayant Nath
- Case no.
- CS(OS) 226/2014
Judgment
O R D E R %
10.11.2017 IA No. 13166/2017 This application is filed under Order 23 Rule 3 & 3A CPC for taking on record the settlement entered into between the parties and passing of a decree as contained in para 2 of the settlement. The terms and conditions of the settlement between the parties who are related to each other have been stated in para 2 of the application. The terms of the settlement are legal. Accordingly, the application is allowed. CS(OS) 226/2014 and IA Nos. 1545-46/2014, 12523/2017 In view of the above, the suit is disposed of A decree is passed in terms of para 2 of the application i.e. IA No.13166/2017. Pending applications also stand disposed of. In terms of Section 16A of the Court fees Act, the plaintiffs shall be entitled to refund of 50% of Court Fees. NOVEMBER 10, 2017/rb JAYANT NATH, J
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 226/2014 SHALINI KUMAR & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Dinesh Garg, Adv. with Ms.Rachna Aggarwal, Adv. versus ATUL DEWAN ..... Defendant Through Mr.Anuj Sehgal and Mr.Atul Batra, Advs. with the defendant-in-person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.