VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Rajinder Kumar Sharma v. Uma Shanker F+

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
24 November 2016
Bench
Joint Registrar (Judicial) Sh. Satinder Kumar Gautam (Dhjs)author
Case no.
CS(OS) 2045/2000

Judgment

O R D E R %

24.11.2016

Learned counsel for the parties submits that the valuation of the suit property for the purpose of pecuniary jurisdiction is less than two crores and address of both the parties are falls within the jurisdiction of Central District as such the matter be sent before the Ld District & Session Judge (Central District), Tis Hazari Court.

In view of notification no 27187/DHC/Orgl. Dated 24.11.2015 & in exercise of powers conferred by Section 4 of the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 2015 (Act 23 of 2015), which came into force with effect from 26.10.2015 vide Notification No. F. No. L-19015/04/2012-Jus dated 26.10.2015 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Law, Justice & Company Affairs, published in Gazette of India Extraordinary, Part-II, Section 3 Sub Section (ii), the present matter stands transferred to the jurisdictional subordinate courts.

Hence, in view of the submission and circumstances, let the matter be sent to the Ld District & Session Judge, (Central District) Tis Hazari Court.

Parties be directed to appear before the Court of Ld District & Session Judge (Central District), Tis Hazari Court on 07.12.2016.

The suit files be made available to the Ld District & Session

Judge (Central District) at Tis Hazari Court on the date fixed.

DR. SATINDER KUMAR GAUTAM (DHJS)

JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)

NOVEMBER 24, 2016

SK

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2045/2000 RAJINDER KUMAR SHARMA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr Vineet Kuamr, Adv alongwith plaintiff in person versus UMA SHANKER F+ ..... Defendant Through: appearance not given CORAM: DR. SATINDER KUMAR GAUTAM (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.