- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 17 November 2025
- Bench
- Neena Bansal Krishna
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 906/2020
Judgment
O R D E R %
17.11.2025
¶1Learned Counsel for the Petitioners on instructions submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the Petitions and he shall be raising all these contentions before the learned Trial Court. This is a digitally signed order. 2. The same are dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. NOVEMBER 17, 2025/neha This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 906/2020 SHRI ANAND KUMAR KAPUR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shashank Dewan, Ms. Nikita Dewan, Mr Ayush Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr Zoheb Hossain Spl counsel for ED Mr Vivek Gurnani Panel Counsel for ED Mr Pranjal Tripathi, Mr kartik Sabharwal, Mr Kanishk Maurya, Advs + W.P.(CRL) 723/2019 MAJ GEN ANAND KUMAR KAPUR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shashank Dewan, Ms. Nikita Dewan, Mr Ayush Kumar, Advocates. versus THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT NEW DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr Zoheb Hossain Spl counsel for ED Mr Vivek Gurnani Panel Counsel for ED Mr Pranjal Tripathi, Mr kartik Sabharwal, Mr Kanishk Maurya, Advs CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.