VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2012 › High Court of Delhi

Bali Ram Prasad v. State & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
25 January 2012
Bench
Mx. Mehtaauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 258/2012

Judgment

ORDER

25.01.2012 +Crl.M.As.No. 917/2012. 915/2012 (Exemption) Exemptionallowed,subjectto alljustexceptions. Applicationsstanddisposedof +Crl.M.C. 258/2012 & 256/2012 These are the petitionsunder Section482 CrPC for quashingof cross FIRs No. 484/2006,under Sections323/341/308/34IPC & 483/2006,under Sections 323/341/308/34IPG, both registered at P.S. Sarita Vihar on the groundthatthe partieshave intersecompromisedthe matter. The FIRs came toberegisteredonthe complaintsofthe oppositepartiesagainsteachother. Both the parties are present in person and are identified by their respectivecounsels. All the parties are residentsof the same locality. They all state having compromisedthe matter and are stated to be left with no grievanceagainst each other. The parties state that they have compromised the matter out of their own free will and volition and without any pressure or coercion of any sort and they are not interestedto pursue their respective complaintsandnow, e leftwithno grievanceagainsteachother. In view of the foregoing and the fact that the parties have amicably resolvedall their disputes,no useftilpurposewould be served by continuing with the above FIRs. Accordingly, FIRs No. 484/2006, under Sections 323/341/308/34 IPG & 483/2006, under Sections 323/341/308/34 IPG, registeredat P.S. Sarita Vihar and all the consequentialproceedingsarising therefromare hereby quashed. Bail bonds of the parties are cancelledand their sureties are discharged. The petitions stand disposedof accordingly. MX. MEHTA,J JANUARY 25,2012/akb

Case details

Parties and counsel

$-21 & 39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 258/2012 BALI RAM PRASAD Petitioner Through: Petitionerin personwithMr.Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. versus % STATE & ORS Respondent Through: Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. Mr.Animesh Kr.Sham, Advocate for R2 to R5 with R2 to R5 in person. With CRL.M.C. 256/2012 JAWAHARPRASAD Through: Petitioner Petitioners in person with Mr.Animeshl^.Sham,Advocate. versus STATE & ORS Respondent Through: Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advocate for R2 to R4 with R2 to R4 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MX. MEHTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.