- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 16 November 2011
- Bench
- Vipin Sanghi
- Case no.
- CONT.CAS(C) 40/2011
Judgment
ORDER %
16.11.2011 C.M.20709/11 This application has been preferred by the petitioner to initiate proceedings for perjury against the respondent on the ground that it had been wrongly stated before this Court that the respondent is preferring a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court whereas the said petition had already been preferred and dismissed on
08.08.2011. The aforesaid statement had been made before the Court on 12.09.2011. Mr. Birbal submits that the respondents were not aware of the dismissal of the SLP before the Supreme Court when the said statement was made. He submits that the respondents have in any Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. case issued a fresh demand letter bearing No.72023 in respect of LIG flat no.144, Pocket 3, Block E, Sector-18, First floor, Rohini, Delhi at the rate prevalent in 1996 in terms of the order of this Court dated
09.09.2010. A copy of the said allotment letter has been tendered in Court and taken on record. The petitioner is not appearing when the matter is being called out. It appears that he does not wish to pursue the petition on account of the aforesaid development. The petition as well as the application are accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. VIPIN SANGHI, J NOVEMBER 16, 2011 as
Case details
Parties and counsel
4~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 40/2011 & C.M.20709/11 RAM KUMAR AGGARWAL Petitioner Through: None versus DDA & ORS Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Birbal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.