Re-In the Matter of M/S Electronic Trade & Technology Dev. Corpn. Ltd

O R D E R %

20.11.2024 CO.APPL. 1014/2024

¶1An Application under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 has been filed on behalf of the Official Liquidator for deposit of compensation of Rs. 55,14,851/- towards the claim of 6 creditors with the Reserve Bank of India, under Section 555 of the Companies Act, 1956 and to permit the Official Liquidator to close the books of accounts of the Company and that the Company be dissolved under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956.

¶2It has been detailed in the Application that vide Order dated

09.05.2005, the Official Liquidator was appointed for Electronic Trade & Technology Development Corporation Limted (hereinafter referred to as the Company-in-Liqn.). The ex-Directors of the Company, were Sh. S.N. Jindal, Sh. Y.S. Bhave, Sh. R.C. Chopra and Sh. P.K. Datta.

¶3The above liquidation was of a Government Company and all the Ex-Directors were Senior Officers of the Government and had claimed to be The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. part-time Directors of the Company and were not aware of the affairs of the Company. They did not file their statement of affairs and did not record their Statement except Sh. P.K. Datta, who gave a statement on 25.07.2005 and no material information could be furnished by him.

¶4The proceedings under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 1956, were taken up but in response to the Letter written to the Ministry of Information and Technology, no relevant information could be obtained. There were various assests, movable and immovable, of the Company as detailed in Paragraph 5 of the Application, which were taken in possession and were auctioned in terms of Orders dated 31.07.2006, 08.03.2007, 26.04.2007,

06.12.2007, 25.08.2011 and 15.11.2018 and the possession of the property was accordingly handed over to the auction purchasers.

¶5In compliance of Order dated 19.07.2006, Claims were invited from the creditors of the Company by publication in various newspapers "Hindustan Times" in Patna, Chandigarh, Bhopal, Kolkata Delhi, Lucknow and Ranchi Editions on 07.11.2006, 'Kannada Prabha' Bangalore Edition, 'Tel. J.D. Patrika', Vaartha, Hyderabad Edition, 'Malaya Manorma' Kochi Edition, 'Loksatta', Mumbai Edition, 'Divya Bhaskar' Ahmedabad Edition and 'Sangbad-Patrika' Kolkata Edition.

¶6In response to the Notice, 24 Claims were received, out of which 22 were admitted and two were rejected. Subsequently, some more claims were received though after a delay, the Claims have been disbursed pursuant to the Orders of this Court. Secured creditors have been paid full amount while the unsecured creditors have been paid on pro-rata basis depending upon the funds that were available. The details are as under : The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. S.NO. NAME AMOUNT ADMITTED STATUS

¶1RPF Commissioner Rs.95,294/- Rs.95,294/- to be disbursed. Not disbursed as Bank details not provided.

¶2P.N.B. (Secured Creditor) Rs.64,05,40,470/- (Rs.12,20,38,986.85) admitted as secured creditoro and Rs.51,85,01,484/- admitted as unsecured creditor) Rs.12,20,38,986.85 Disbursed (towards secured moebale assets) Unsecured amount of Rs.1,04,50,044/- paid on pro-rata basis.

¶3Syndicate Bank Rs.1,30,14,61,672/- (Rs.26,04,75,684/- admitted as secured creditor and Rs.104,10,85,989/- admitted as unsecured creditor) Rs.26,04,75,684/- Disbursed (towards secured moveable assets) Unsecured amount of Rs.2,15,96,759/- paid on pro-rata basis.

¶4Workers (2)

¶1Sh. Munni Lal

¶2Sh. Biwa Goswami Rs.29,86,875/- Rs.7,08,060/- disbursed @23.70%. Balance amount of Rs.22,78,815/- to be disbursed. Not disbursed as Bank details not provided.

¶5Sh. V.S.R.Mohan Rao (Preferential) Rs.68,210/- Rs.20,000/- disbursed (U/s 530) Un-secured The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. amount of Rs.48,210/- to be disbursed. Not disbursed as Bankk details not provided.

¶6Jyotishwar Chakravaty (Employee) Rs.27,64,198/- Rs.20,000/- disbursed (U/s 530) Un-secured amount of Rs.27,44,198/- to be disbursed. Not disbursed as Bank details not provided.

¶7Surma Trading (un-secured creditor) Rs.2,95,735/- Rs.55,713/- disbursed on pro-rata basis.

¶8SARC IT solution (un-secured creditor) Rs.75,000/- Rs.12195/- disbursed on pro-rata basis.

¶9Pinnacle Computers (un-secured creditor) Rs.50,000/- Rs.8,130/- disbursed on pro-rata basis.

¶10Central Warehousing Corporation (un-secured creditor) Rs.4,00,921/- Rs.65,189/75 disbursed on pro-rata basis.

¶11Punjab Communication (un-secured creditor) Rs.2,00,469/- Rs.32,596/- disbursed on pro-rata basis.

¶12SPG (un-secured creditor) Rs.72,648/- Rs.11,812/- disbursed on pro-rata basis.

¶13V.R. Kishore (un-secured creditor) Rs.38,783/- Rs.6,306/- disbursed on pro-rata basis.

¶14Tapesh Singhal (un-Rs.4,94,575/- Rs.93,173/- The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. secured creditor) disbursed on pro-rata basis.

¶15Data Group (un-secured creditor) Rs.12,57,856.50 Rs.2,68,854/- disbursed on pro-rata basis.

¶16Badal Chand Surma (un-secured creditor) Rs.5,48,000/- Rs.89,104/- disbursed on pro-rata basis.

¶17R. Hanumantha Charvulu (un-secured creditor) Rs.49,010/- Rs.7,969/- disbursed on pro-rata basis.

¶18Carrier Computers (un-secured creditor) Rs.50,000/- Rs.8,130/- disbursed on pro-rata basis.

¶19Swapan Bhatacharya (un-secured creditor) Rs.12,55,884/- Rs.2,04,206/- disbursed on pro-rata basis.

¶20HDFC (un-secured creditor) Rs.35,31,534/- Rs.5,74,227/- disbursed on pro-rata basis.

¶21Dr. Ambedkar Foundation, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India (un-secured creditor) Rs.1,70,76,173/- Rs.3,49,287/- to be paid on pro-rata basis. Not disbursed as Bank details not provided.

¶22SCOPE (un-secured creditor) Rs.10,98,06,069/- Rs.24,38,346/- paid on pro-rata basis.

¶23N.C. Benerjee Rejected

¶24Sh. D. Damodar Rao Rejected

¶7It is further submitted that five creditors mentioned at Serial No. 1, 4, 5, 6 and 21 failed to provide their bank details and indemnity bond, The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. therefore, the amounts could not be disbursed to their admitted claimants. Therefore, permission is sought to deposit Rs.55,14,851/- for the claims of these creditors with the RBI under Section 555 of the Companies Act, 1956. It is further submitted that after deducting the liquidation expenses towards audit fee, Government Commisison, Tax Liability, Professional fee and administration expenses to the tune of Rs.36,25,878/- the fund position of the Company as on date is NIL. It is, therefore, submitted that the requisite permission be granted for deposit of money with the RBI and further, to close the Books of Account of the Company, which may be dissolved under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956.

¶8Submissions heard and record perused.

¶9In light of the submissions made and considering that the funds position of the Company has become NIL after adjusting the amounts due to secured and unsecured creditors and administrative expenses, requisite permission is granted for closing the Books of Accounts and the liquidation proceedings came to an end. The amount of Rs.55,14,851/- be deposited with the RBI within 15 days, as per Section 555 of the Companies Act, 1956.

¶10The Application is disposed of accordingly.

¶11The intimation be also sent to the ROC within 30 days by the Official Liquidator. CO.PET. 422/2000

¶12A Petition under Section 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners, for winding up of the Company.

¶13In view of the Order passed in the Application bearing CO.APPL. 1014/2024, the Petition is disposed of accordingly. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶14The date already fixed i.e. 19.03.2025 stands cancelled. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J NOVEMBER 20, 2024/RS The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO.PET. 422/2000 RE-IN THE MATTER OF M/S ELECTRONIC TRADE & TECHNOLOGY DEV. CORPN. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: None versus ..... .....Respondent Through: Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms. Megha Bharara, Advocates for OL. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA