VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2017 › High Court of Delhi

Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Heera Devi & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
9 November 2017
Bench
R.K.Gaubaauthor
Case no.
MAC.APP. 8/2012

Judgment

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

¶1The appellant has been burdened with the liability to pay the compensation determined by judgment dated 14.11.2011 in the accident claim case (suit no. 280/2010) of the first and second respondents, against the backdrop of submissions made by the parties that the original cover note on the basis of which it was pleaded that the offending vehicle described as one bearing registration no. DL 1L J 8180, was covered by a third party insurance policy had been lost, it becoming subject matter of the police report. The appellant questions the decision of the Tribunal on the basis that such liability could not have been placed at its door.

MAC Appeal No. 8/2012

¶2It is noted that the tribunal has granted recovery rights to the appellants. It is also noted that in terms of the order dated

04.01.2012, the insurance company had deposited the entire awarded amount with the Registrar General and pursuant to such order and by order dated 09.03.2012, 50% of the said awarded amount had been released to the claimants.

¶3In these circumstances, the interest of the insurer having already been duly protected by grant of recovery rights, no case is made out for exoneration.

¶4The appeal is thus dismissed.

¶5The balance amount lying in deposit shall now be released to the claimants. The insurer is at liberty to enforce its recovery rights by taking out appropriate proceedings before the tribunal.

R.K.GAUBA, J. NOVEMBER 09, 2017 umang

Case details

Parties and counsel

MAC Appeal No. 8/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: 9th November, 2017 + MAC.APP. 8/2012 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. versus HEERA DEVI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.