Jatin @ Jatin Tok v. State of U.P

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33460 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.

¶1List has been revised.

¶2Heard Shri Vikas Chandra Srivastava and Sri Vipul Singh, learned counsels for the applicant, Sri Ishtiyaq Khan, Advocate holding brief of Sri Naveen Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the informant as well as Shri Arun Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶3Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.243 of 2025, under Sections 109, 351(2), 352, 191(2), 115(2) B.N.S., Police Station Noida Sector 24 (Commissionerate), District Gautam Buddha Nagar, during the pendency of trial.

¶4It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that similarly placed co-accused person, Akash Awana has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 22.9.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.24161 of 2025. The applicant is languishing in jail since 8.6.2025, having no criminal history. He further submitted that since the role of the applicant is identical to that of co-accused, who has already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity.

¶5The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.G.A. However, the aforesaid factual aspects of parity to the co-accused and of no criminal history of the applicant, have not been disputed by him. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vikas Chandra Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jatin @ Jatin Tok .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, pending trial and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail on the ground of parity. The bail application is allowed on the ground of parity.

¶7Let the applicant-Jatin @ Jatin Tok involved in aforementioned case crime number be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions.

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial.

(ii) The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed.

¶8In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.

¶9Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶10It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion on the testimony of the witnesses. September 26, 2025 Vikas Verma BAIL No. 33460 of 2025 (Krishan Pahal,J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad