VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2025 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rohit Dixit v. State of U.P

Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
7 October 2025
Case no.
BAIL 32950/2025

Judgment

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32950 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.

¶1Heard Sri Dharmendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Mohammad Faisal Khan, learned counsel for the first informant and Sri D.P. S Chauhan, learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶2Instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail during the trial in Case Crime No.193 of 2025, under Sections 109(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3) B.N.S., Police Station-Civil Line, District Muzaffarnagar.

¶3Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant was not named either in the FIR or in the statement of injured Harsh Kumar. Allegations were made in the FIR as well as in the statement of injured against co-accused Kunal Gujjar, Aslam, Abhishek, Vikas Rathi and Kartikey and the applicant has been falsely implicated though no incriminating material is available in the case diary against him. He also added that applicant has no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 10.08.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings.

¶4On the other hand, learned counsel for the first informant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact.

¶5Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dharmendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mohammad Faisal Khan Rohit Dixit .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶6Let the applicant-Rohit Dixit involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him.

¶7In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶8Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. October 8, 2025 A.Kr. BAIL No. 32950 of 2025 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.