VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Bombay High Court 2025 › High Court of Bombay

Yogiraj Vishnu Kedar v. Ramdhan Yogiraj Bade and Others

DISPOSED OFF
Court
High Court of Bombay
Decided
14 February 2025
Bench
Mangesh S. Patil, Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Case no.
CA 3739/2024

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8610 OF 2024

¶1Vijay S/o. Vishwanath Sanap Age: 26 Years, Occ: Education R/O. At Yedud, Post Lakh, Tq. Audha Nagnath, Dist. Hingoli-431702

¶2Sandeep S/o. Nana Bormale Age: 30 Years, Occ: Education R/O. At Vasai, Post Halda, Tq. Sillod, Dist, Aurangabad-431112

¶3Neha W/o Sumit Bokade Age: 32 years, Occ: Education R/O. Plot No. 47-A, Ashwinnagar, Badade layout, Hinghna Road, Tq. Dist. Akola -444001

¶4Neha D/o. Shobhanath Yadav Age: 30 years, Occ: Education R/O. 302, Jiwan Prakash Building, Louieswadi, Opp. Union Bank Louieswadi Tq. Dist. Thane-400604

¶5Shital D/o. Ashok Dahifale Age: 31 years, Occ: Education R/O. Samarth Nagar, Near Shikshak Colony, Mali Babhulgaon, Pathardi, Tq. Pathardi, Dist. Ahmednagar - 414102

¶6Datta S/o. Madhav Chitte Age: 25 Years, Occ: Education R/O. At Wahad, Post Kurula, Tq. Kandhar, Dist. Nanded-431742

¶7Mohan S/o. Balaji Kendre Age: 32 Years, Occ: Education R/O. At Post Haduli, Tq. Kandhar Dist. Nanded … PETITIONERS VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary School Education and Sports Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2025:BHC-AUG:4313-DB

¶2The Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State, Pune. Having office at Annibesant Road, District Pune.

¶3The Chairman, Central Board of Secondary Education Shiksha Kendra-2 Community Center Preet Vihar, Delhi.

¶4National Council of Teachers Education Through Chairperson Office at G-7, Dwarka, Near Metro Station, New Delhi. … RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.2534 OF 2024

¶1Ramdhan s/o Yogiraj Bade, Age : 32 Yrs., Occu. Nil, R/o. Gavdhar, Tq. Dharur District : Beed

¶2Prashant s/o Anantrao Aaghav, Age : 34 Yrs., Occu. Nil., R/o Paithan, Tq. Paithan, District Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar.

¶3Dhananjay Janardhan Cheke, Age : 32 Yrs., Occu. Nil, R/o post Aregaon, Tq. Mehkar, Distrct Buldhana.

¶4Shital Agatrao Gholave, Age 34 years, Occu. Education, R/o Malkapur, Tq. Kallamb, District Dharashiv.

¶5Swapnil Subhash Khedkar, Age 31 years, Occu. Education, R/o Tuljai Chowk Canal Road, Beed, District Beed.

¶6Chaya Achutrao Palwade, Age 33 years, Occu. Education, R/o Koregaon Road, Chumb, Tq. Barshi, Dist. Solapur

¶7Sandip S/o Vishnu Kedar, Age 34 years, Occu. Education, R/o Warni, Tq. Shrir Kasar, District Beed.

¶8Sudarshan Vijay Palaskar, Age 34 years, Occu. Education, R/o Kedarkheda, Tq. Bhokardhan, District Jalna. … PETITIONERS VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra Through its Principal Secretary, School Education & Sports Deptt. Mantralaya, Mumbai-400 032

¶2The Commissioner for School Education & Sports Deptt., Government of Maharashtra, Pune. … RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9692 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2534 OF 2024 Ramesh S/o Arjun Thorat & Others … APPLICANTS (Interveners) VERSUS Ramdhan s/o Yogiraj Bade & Others … RESPONDENTS AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3738 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2534 OF 2024 Sachin s/o Haribhau Fand & Another … APPLICANTS (Interveners) VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Others … RESPONDENTS AND oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo WP.8610.24.TET.odt + CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3739 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2534 OF 2024 Yogiraj Vishnu Kedar … APPLICANTS (Interveners) VERSUS Ramdhan s/o Yogiraj Bade & Ors. … RESPONDENTS AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8433 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2534 OF 2024 Lahanu Khandu Sadgir & Ors. … APPLICANTS (Interveners) VERSUS Ramdhan s/o Yogiraj Bade & Ors. … RESPONDENTS AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8434 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2534 OF 2024 Kalyan S/o Prabhu Shep & Anr. … APPLICANTS (Interveners) VERSUS Ramdhan s/o Yogiraj Bade & Ors. … RESPONDENTS AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11260 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2534 OF 2024 Sudhir s/o Dnyanadeo Bambarse … APPLICANTS (Interveners) VERSUS Ramdhan s/o Yogiraj Bade & Ors. … RESPONDENTS … AND WRIT PETITION NO.7938 OF 2024

¶1Arjun S/o Mangilal Rathod Age : 30 Year, Occ : Education R/o, At Takali Rajerai, Tq Khultabad, Dist Aurangabad

¶2Dinesh S/o Santosh Halor Age : 34 years, Occ: Education R/o, At Post Udane, Tq. & Dist. Dhule

¶3Anjali D/o Zulal Patil Age : 30 Years, Occ: Education R/o, At Post Sakri Road, Shri Hari Colony, Tq. & Dist. Dhule

¶4Sandeep S/o Rangarao Patil Age : 37 Years, Occ: Education R/o, At Panewadi, Post Savarde Patankar, Tq. Radhanagari, Dist. Kolhapur

¶5Umesh S/o Bhanudas Pathe Age : 38, Occ : Education R/o. At Post Khedale Kajali, Tq Newasa, Dist. Ahmednagar

¶6Rajkumar S/o Sahebrao Ijgude Age : 35 Years, Occ: Education R/o, At Post Nimjgaon, Tq. Madha, Dist. Solapur

¶7Sainath S/o Vitthal Kolte Age : 32 Years, Occ: Education R/o, at Post Misalwadi, Tq. Chikhali, Dist. Buldhana

¶8Manisha d/o Ramdas Hyalij Age : 39 years, Occ: Education R/o. At Post Snehagar, Dindori Road, Nashik

¶9Dipali d/o Bhikchand Ghitre Age : 30 years, Occ: Education R/o. Rajesambhaji Colony, Jadhavwadi, Aurangabad

¶10Sonam d/o Krishnat Mane Age : 31 years, Occu: Education R/o. Chhatrapati Rajaram Colony, Kasba Bavda, Kolhapur.

¶11Shubhangi d/o. Sarjerao Khairnar Age : 35 years, Occu: Education R/o. At post Malharwadi, Tq. Nandgaon, Dist. Nashik

¶12Sangita d/o Bhojalal Gautam Age : 31 years, Occu: Education R/o. At post Nawargaon Khu., Tq. Dist. Gondiya ..PETITIONERS VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary School Education and Sports Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

¶2The Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State, Pune Having office at Annibesant Road, District Pune.

¶3Deputy Director of Education, Regional Office, Aurangabad

¶4National Council of Teachers Education through Chairperson Office at G-7, Dwarka, Near Metro Station, New Delhi ..RESPONDENTS ... AND WRIT PETITION NO.7956 OF 2024 Dilbar Husain Mateen Ahmad Age : 30 Year, Occ : Private Job R/o: At present Near Shivaji Chowk, Biloli Tq. Bilolik, Dist. Nanded. … PETITIONER VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32

¶2The Commissioner of Education Maharashtra State, Central Building Pune … RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.10709 OF 2024

¶1Santosh Dharmaji Padmukh Age : 33 Year, Occ : Nil At – Wakhare, Tal – Jalna, Dist-Jalna - 431203

¶2Bhagyashree Mahadev Revdekar Age – 32, Occu: Nil, At – Kasal, House No.165B, Nawabazar Kasal, Tal. Kudal, Dist. Sindhudurg - 416603

¶3Pankaj Bhimrao Thakre Age : 33, Occ. Nil, At – Borgaon, Post – Kawlewada, Tal – Goregaon, Dist. Gondiya – 441601

¶4Ganesh Dnyaneshwar Borkar Age : 30, Occu : Nil, At – Tondgaon, Tal. Washim, Dist. Washim – 444505

¶5Bajrang Shamrao Kokare Age : 35, Occu. Nil, At – Bandgarwadi, Post – Chopadi, Ta. Sangola, Dist. Solapur – 413308

¶6Swapnil Ramakant Mahajan Age : 29, Occu: Nil, At – Rokade Galli Talai, Tal. Erandol, Dist. Jalgaon – 425110

¶7Urmila Mayuresh Pardeshi Age : 30, Occ. Nil, At – Kharadi, Tal. Pune City, Sr. No.47, 5/A, Sainagari Chandannagar, Lane No.13, Pune – 411014

¶8Sonali Rajendra Bhalekar Age : 31, Occ. Nil, At – Vitthal Niwas, Shraddha Colony, Tal. Sangamner, Dist. Ahmednagar – 422605

¶9Madhuri Jitendra Funde Age : 35, Occ. Nil, Shriram Nagar, Tumsar, Tal. Tumsar, Dist. Bhandara – 441912

¶10Rajat Omprakash Tole Age : 26, Occ. Nil, At – Near Hanuman Mandir, Murwadi, Thaware Nagar, Tal. Lakhani, Dist. Bhandara – 441804

¶11Shweta Babulal Bhujale Age : 31, Occ. Nil At Post Tirupati Nagar Dist. Hingoli - 431513

¶12Nitin Rameshwar Kumbhalkar Age : 33 Occu: Nil, Tukdoji Square, Ward No.2, Tal. Deori, Dist. Gondiya – 441902

¶13Harishchandra Vasant Nagapure Age : 36 Occu: Nil, At – Chekdarur, Ta. Gandpipri, Dist. Chandrapur – 442702

¶14Pankaj Bhikram Thakre Age : 28, Occu. Nil, at – Borgaon, Post Kawlewadi, Tal. Goregaon, Dist. Gondiya – 441601

¶15Rahul Arun Palwe Age : 28, Occu. Nil, At – Samrod, Tal. Jamner, Dist. Jalgaon – 424206

¶16Shahaji Shantaram Lende Age : 34, Occ.Nil, At – Khambe, Post Warwandi, Tal. Sangamner, Dist. Ahmednagar – 413738

¶17Swati Sukhdeo Nagargoje Age – 33, Occ. Nil, At – Flat No.1, DSK Tower, Yashwant Nagar, Tal. Paithan, Dist. Aurangabad – 431107

¶18Dipali Arunpant Boharupi Age – 33, Occ. Nil, At – Ward No.3, At Post Gadegaon, Tal. Warud, Dist. Amravati – 444906

¶19Onkar Gopal Khawale Age – 34, Occ. Nil At – Kathora, Post Bhota, Tal. Shegaon, Dist. Buldhana – 443404 … PETITIONERS VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary of Department of Education & Sports, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400 001

¶2Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State, Pune. Central Building, Pune – 01

¶3Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State Exam Council, 17 Dr. Ambedkar Marg, Near Lal Temple, Pune … RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.7922 OF 2024

¶1Khatik Shaikh Imran Shaikh Saeed Age : 34 Year, Occ : Nil R/o. Near Dilli Darwaja Azaad Chowk, Parola, Tq. & District Jalgaon

¶2Shaikh Irfan Shaikh Shabbir, Age: 33 years, Occu: Nil, R/o. Plot No.85, Mustufa Colony Near Ausa Masjid Chopda Tq. Chopda, District Jalgaon … PETITIONERS VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra through its Principal Secretary, School Education & Sports Deptt. Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400 032

¶2The Commissioner for School Education & Sports Deptt., Government of Maharashtra Pune. … RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.11544 OF 2024

¶1Deepali d/o Ramesh Pawar Age: 37 Years, Occ: Education R/O: RH-No.14, Vinayak Park Deolai Parisar, Deolai, Chh. Sambhajinagar - 431001

¶2Madhuri d/o Madhukar Aglawe Age: 35 Years, Occ: Education R/o. Plot No.38, Sudhakar Nagar Satara Parisar, Chh. Sambhajinagar – 431003

¶3Anup s/o Ramesh Katwalkar Age: 34 years, Occ: Education R/o. Plot No. 47-A, Satpal Nagar, New Pahadsingpura, Chh. Sambhajinagar – 431001

¶4Nisha d/o. Dnyaneshwarrao Kale Age: 35 years, Occ: Education R/o. Plot No.37, Raje Sambhaji Colony Jadhavwadi, Jalgaon Road, Chh. Sambhajinagar - 431001

¶5Vidhya D/o. Dhiwaruji Gedam Age : 37 Years, Occu: Educational R/o. At Post Someshwar, Tq. & Dist. Nanded

¶6Ashok S/o. Dhondu Nibrad Age : 38 years, Occ: Education R/o. Plot No.8, Adharsh Colony, Pahadsingpura, Chh. Sambhajinagar - 431001 … PETITIONERS VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra Through its Principal Secretary School Education and Sports Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai

¶2The Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State, Pune. Having office at Annibesant Road, District Pune.

¶3The Chairman, Central Board of Secondary Education Shiksha Kendra-2 Community Center Preet Vihar, Delhi (Deleted as per court's order dated 10.12.2024)

¶4National Council of Teachers Education Through Chairperson Office at G-7, Dwarka, Near Metro Station, New Delhi. (Deleted as per court's order dated 10.12.2024) … RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.11521 OF 2024

¶1Lukman s/o Hannan Shaikh Age: 35 Years, Occ: Education R/o: House No.8/4, Behind Telephone Bhavan, Ajabnagar, Aurangabad

¶2Monika d/o Sushant Naik Age: 35 Years, Occ: Education R/o. House No.5/12/1939, Kaman Wasti, Padampura, Aurangabad

¶3Haresh s/o. Govind Albad Age: 33 years, Occ: Education R/o. House No.1/2/1135, Sundarnagar, Padegaon, Behind Sai Mandir, Aurangabad.

¶4Pratibha d/o Sadashiv Antre Age: 40 years, Occ: Education R/o. At Post Songaon, Tq. Rahuri, Dist. Ahmedngar – 413711

¶5Balaso s/o. Subhash Kashid Age : 36 Years, Occu: Education R/o. Indraprastha Colony, Balepir, Nagar Road, Beed

¶6Rupali d/o. Nanasaheb Somwanshi Age : 37 years, Occ: Education R/o. Tirupati Residency, Building-A, Flat No.9, Cidco Mahanagar-1, Waluj, Aurangabad-431136

¶7Kavita d/o. Ramrao Rathod Age : 35 years, Occu: Education R/o. House No.36, Adarsh Colony, Guru Ganesh Nagar, Pahadsingpura, Aurangabad. ..PETITIONERS VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra Through its Principal Secretary School Education and Sports Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai

¶2The Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State, Pune. Having office at Annibesant Road, District Pune.

¶3The Chairman, Central Board of Secondary Education Shiksha Kendra-2 Community Center Preet Vihar, Delhi (Deleted as per court's order dated 10.12.2024)

¶4National Council of Teachers Education Through Chairperson Office at G-7, Dwarka, Near Metro Station, New Delhi. (Deleted as per court's order dated 10.12.2024) ..RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.10710 OF 2024

¶1Vinayak Shripat Kolage Age – 33, Occ – Nil, C/102, Swarali Apartment Co.Op. Hsg. Society, Waman Nagar, Manvel Pada Road, Virar (E), Dist – Palghar, 401305.

¶2Dinesh Barku Birade Age 35, Occ. Nil, R/at Mahsa, Tal-Murbad, Dist-Thane - 421401

¶3Vishakha Vijay Ranvir Age – 35, Occ. Nil R/at Kurla, Ashok Nagar, Hall No. 3, Mumbai - 400070

¶4Swati Santosh Macchi Age 36, Occ. Nil R/at Chikhle, Palghar, Dist-Palghar - 40160

¶5Sameer Subhash Dighe Age 30, Occ. Nil R/at Raigad Naigaon, Dighe Wadi, Dist. Raigad – 410205.

¶6Sujit Satish Sanap Age 32, Occ. Nil R/at Kolad, Dist. Raigad – 402304.

¶7Vidhya Kanif Devkar Age 37, Occ. Nil R/at Parande Vasti, Tal – Indapur, Dist. Pune – 413120.

¶8Aniket Jayant Vadal Age 30 , Occ. Nil R/at Chaul, Tal – Alibaug, Dist – Raigad - 402203

¶9Sheetal Vilas Chalisgaonkar Age 35, Occ. Nil R/at Raghunathpur, Amravati, Dist. Amravati - 444711

¶10Gaitri Devidas Ingale Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at pathrot, Tal – Achalpur, Dist. Amravati - 444808

¶11Mayuri Kamlakarao Dhole Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Near Maruti Mandir, Khadkari, Amravati, Dist-Amravati 444601

¶12Neha Sharadrao Gujarkar Age 33, Occ. Nil R/at Rajmata Nagar, Morshi Road, Shivaji Nagar, Amravati, Dist. Amravati - 444603

¶13Sharda Charandas Kolteke Age 44, Occ. Nil R/at Daryapur, Vasant Nagar, Amravati, Dist. Amravati – 444803.

¶14Dattatray Kisan Sumbar Age 33, Occ. Nil R/at Valuj, Tal – Gangnapur, Dist. - Aurangabad – 431133

¶15Ganesh Laxman Tapkir Age 36, Occ. Nil R/at Bidkeen behind grampanchyat, Aurangabad, Dist. Aurangabad – 431105.

¶16Santosh Shivling Hingmire Age 29, Occ. Nil R/at Kelgaon, Tal-Sillod, Aurangabad, Dist. Aurangabad - 421112

¶17Deshmukh Firdous Anjum Mohammed Rafique Age 25, Occ. Nil, R/at Sillod, Dist – Aurangabad - 431112

¶18Rahul Karbhari Tribhuvan Age 34, Occ. Nil, R/at Palkhed, Aurangabad, Dist. Aurangabad – 423703

¶19Priti Vikram Potdar Age 35, Occ. Nil R/at Shradha Niwas, Plot No. 23, Shreeram Colony, Satara, Dist. Satara, 415002

¶20Mangesh Appa Nerkar Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Dhaval, Tal – Phalatan, Dist. Satara, 415523

¶21Tejaswi Mohan Dhavade Age 35, Occ. Nil R/at Near Toll Plaza, Pedgaon, Satara, Dist. Satara - 415521

¶22Neeta Balso Kakde Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Jinti, Satara, Dist. Satara, 415522

¶23Parmanand Udav Kamble Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Wadwal Nagnath, Tal – Chakur, Dist. Latur – 413529.

¶24Mukund Govindrao Gaikwad Age 33, Occ. Nil R/at Awalkonda, Latur, Dist. Latur, 413517.

¶25Sheela Sahebrao Kamble Age 35, Occ. Nil R/at Kasarjavla, Latur, Dist. Latur – 463511

¶26Sachin Pandurang Kawale Age 36, Occ. Nil R/at Tilaknagar, Latur, Dist. - Latur-413531.

¶27Nagnath Panjabrao Mhaske Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Murtijapur Savangi, Hingoli, Dist. Hingoli, 431705

¶28Sheetal Prakashrao Sonale Age 29, Occ. Nil R/at Akhada Balapur, Tal – Kalamnuri, Dist. Hingoli - 431701

¶29Kirankumar Prakashrao Sonale Age 34, Occ. Nil. R/at Akhada Balapur, Jetvan nagar, Hingoli, Dist. Hingoli, 431701

¶30Vinod Sakharam Khillare Age 33, Occ. Nil R/at Gunda, Tal – Basmat, Dist – Hingoli, 431705

¶31Khushab Daulat Barsagade Age 35, Occ. Nil R/at Balapur Khurd, Maushi, Chandrapur, Dist – Chandrapur, 441206

¶32Chetan Prakash Kale Age 28, Occ. Nil R/at Vihirgaon, Chandrapur, Dist – Chandrapur, 441215

¶33Gaurav Devidas Meshram Age 26, Occ. Nil R/at Mahatma Phule Vidyalaya, Shindevahi, Chandrapur, Dist. Chandrapur, 441222.

¶34Vidya Vasantrao Rajurkar Age 38, Occ. Nil R/at Bhandarvati Chandrapur, Dist. Chandrapur, 442902

¶35Balaram Santosh Kudke Age 32, Occ. Nil R/at Nagar Sul, Tal – Yevala, Dist. Nashik 423403

¶36Nitin Ramesh Gunjal Age 39, Occ. Nil R/at Patil Nagar, Cidco, Nashik Dist. Nashik, 422008

¶37Bhaskar Lahanu Sanap Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Lohshingve, Bhalur, Nashik, Dist. Nashik – 423106

¶38Santoshi Ramesh Khedikar Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Sasra, Tal – Sakoli, Dist – Bhandara, 441802

¶39Ashwini Manohar Bhute Age 35, Occ. Nil, R/at Sakoli, Dist. Bhandara, 441802

¶40Ravishankar Tejram Baraskar Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Sakoli Sasra, Bhandara, Dist. - Bhandara, 441102

¶41Hemkant Nivruti Khotele Age 28, Occ. Nil R/at Sendurvafa, Tal-Sakoli, Bhandara, Dist. Bhandara, 441802

¶42Sanjay Dhanraj Waghaye Age 31, Occ. Nil R/at Kesalvadi, Patil Ward, Bhandara, Dist. Bhandara, 441104

¶43Sujata Sachin Garudkar Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Kartewadi, Tergaon, Karjat, Dist. Ahmednagar, 414401

¶44Sunil Satappa Arde Age 33, Occ. Nil R/at Dattamandi, Boring Galli, Kudki, Tal-Radhanagari, Dist. Kolhapur, 416212

¶45Rajesh Prakash Satpure Age 33, Occ. Nil R/at Tisangi, Kolhapur, Dist. Kolhapur, 416206.

¶46Rajaram Pandurang Khot Age 38, Occ. Nil R/at Near Hanuman Mandir, Gargoti, Kolhapur, Dist. Kolhapur, 416209

¶47Dipak Ramchandra Tamkar Age 35, Occ. Nil R/at Ingle Wadi, Onancase, Ratnagiri, Dist. Ratnagiri – 415706

¶48Jayesh Ankush Shinde Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Dhangarwadi, Tal-Rajapur, Dist. Ratnagiri-413713

¶49Savita Gopal Rathod Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Raoltale, Chiplun, Tal-Chiplun, Dist. Ratnagiri – 415605

¶50Vrushali Raghunath Mundekar, Age 31, Occ. Nil R/at Deulwadi, Bhatgaon, Tal. Bhatgaon, Dist. Ratnagiri – 415726.

¶51Rajesh Dilip Ingale Age 31, Occ. Nil R/at Ananvase, Umbarghar Road, Ratnagiri, Dist. Ratnagiri, 415706

¶52Ram Sopan Kare Age 33, Occ. Nil R/at Baherewadi, Post, Jakhale, Dist. Kolhapur , 416113

¶53Neha Vinayak Koli, Age 35, Occ. Nil R/at Koli Galli, Ghandhi Chowk, Tal – Miraj, dist. Sangali, 416422

¶54Sheetal Prashanta Bhokare Age 35, Occ. Nil R/at Hilwadi, Tal. Palus, Dist-Sangali, 413303

¶55Reshma Rajaram Sarulkar Age 32, Occ. Nil R/at Shivaji Nagar, Indira Colony Road No.1, Islampur, Tal – Islampur, dist. Sangali, 411509

¶56Rahul Pandurang Katre Age 35, Occ. Nil R/at Vasandada Nagar, Bhilwadi, Sangali, Dist. Sangali, 416303

¶57Mahesh Dattatray Naik Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Naik Mala, Kaulapure, Sangali, Dist. Sangali, 436306

¶58Baliramdada Patole Age 33, Occ. Nil R/at Nagole, Sangali, Dist. Sangali, 416405

¶59Chetan Devidas Kharbade Age 28, Occ. Nil R/at Dhalpa, Tal – Katol, Bori, Nagpur, Dist. Nagpur – 441302

¶60Akhilesh Ramesh Bhrakhe Age 26, Occ. Nil R/at Umred, Nagpur, Dist. - Nagpur – 441203

¶61Komal Shriramji Thombare Age 36, Occ. Nil R/at Ward No. 2, Tarasangva, Vardha, Dist. Vardha, 442202

¶62Pravin Babarao Londhekar Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Sindi Railway Near, Dist. Vardha, 442105

¶63Priti Nareshrao Dhambare Age 35, Occ. Nil R/at Near Budhvihar, Anje, Vardha, Dist. Vardha – 442001

¶64Switi Gajanan Kuntiwar Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Yevli, Gadchiroli, Dist – Gadchiroli, 442605

¶65Kavita Mangesh Shelke Age 35, Occ. Nil R/at Babanrao Deshpande Near Ward No. 2, Motala, Buldhana, Dist. Buldhana, 443103.

¶66Moreshwar Dadaji Urade Age 37, Occ. Nil, R/at Chapahalwada, Tal-Chamarmoshi, Dist. Gadchiroli – 442604

¶67Sainath Sudhakar Gedam Age 33, Occ. Nil R/at Pardi, Tal – Gadchiroli, Dist – Gadchiroli, 442605.

¶68Alka Bhanudas Wayzode Age 32, Occ. Nil R/at Yengaon, Wadshingi, Buldhana, Dist. Buldhana – 443402.

¶69Sandeep Samadhan Palve Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Sadargaon Dhagir, Shelgaon Bazar, Buldhana, Dist-Buldhana 443102.

¶70Mohini Nikhil Shah Age 32, Occ. Nil R/at Khamgaon, Tal – Khamgaon, Dist. Buldhana-444303

¶71Avinash Vishnu Ingale Age 33, Occ. Nil R/at Somthana Peth, Buldhana, Dist. Buldhana, 443201

¶72Santosh Baburao Kendre Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Malegaon Road, Near Hanuman Mandir, Nanded, Dist. Nanded, 431605

¶73Anil Sudam Chavan Age 37, Occ. Nil R/at Ruplanaik, Tal – Mahur, Nanded, Dist. Nanded – 431721.

¶74Shubham Suresh Basalwar Age 29, Occ. Nil R/at Dattanagar, Town Market, Shivaji Nagar, Nanded, Dist. Nanded, 431602

¶75Amar Uttreshwar Tupare Age 35, Occ. Nil R/at Borgaon, Itpur, Osmanabad, Dist. Osmanabad – 413507

¶76Vilas Narayan Jadhav Age 42, Occ. Nil R/at Kandlwadi Road, Baba Nagar, Kalam, Osmanabad, Dist. Osmanabad, 413507

¶77Dipali Mohan Bhosale Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Shikshak Colony, Malibahulgaon, Tal. Pathardi, Dist. Ahmednagar, 414102

¶78Pravina Sakharam Jamdar Age 37, Occ. Nil R/at Lokhande Galli, Tal. Nevasa, Dist. Ahmednagar – 414602

¶79Sanket Sudhir Harne Age 33, Occ. Nil R/at Karne Ali, Tal-Kankavali, Sindhudurga, Dist. Sindhudurga, 416602

¶80Abdul Khadeer Altaf Patel Age 39, Occ. Nil R/at Ausa, Lamsana, Tal – Ausa, Dist. Latur – 413516.

¶81Vaibhav Vinayak Andure Age 32, Occ. Nil R/at Patardi, Ahmednagar, Dist. Ahmednagar, 414113

¶82Kirankumar Dipak Taskar Age 36, Occ. Nil R/at Ganeshwar Nagar, Colony, Sangamner, Tal. Sangamner, Dist. Ahmednagar, 422605.

¶83Avinash Pralahad Jawale Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Vithalmandir Galli, Jamkhed, Ahmednagar, Dist. Ahmednagar-413201

¶84Pravin Dattatray Lokhande Age 32, Occ. Nil R/at Bus Stand Samor, Taklibhan, Ahmednagar, Dist-Ahmednagar, 413725.

¶85Divyani Dattu Agale Age 31, Occ. Nil R/at Nevasa Khurd, Rural, Dist. Ahmednagar – 413303

¶86Pandurang Baburao Bangar Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Nalewadi, Tal. Ambad, Dist. Jalana, 431205.

¶87Vinayak Shripat Kolge Age 33, Occ. Nil R/at Room No. 2, Amdar Niwas, Servant Qurts. Maharshi Karve Road, Mantralaya, Mumbai – 400032.

¶88Pravin Bhaidas Kokani Age 31, Occ. Nil R/at Dhekwad, Dist. Nandurbar, 425412

¶89Jayshree Baban Yelve Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Grampanchayat Gaothan, Daithane Gunjal, Dist.-Ahmednagar, 414103.

¶90Rahul Babu Bramhne Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Prakasha, Tal. Shadada, Dist. Ahmednagar – 425422

¶91Lata Vithoba Devale Age 38, Occ. Nil R/at Near Malwadi Zilha Parishad, Tal. - Sangola, Dist – Solapur, 413307

¶92Surekha Lalchand Bhamre Age 42, Occ. Nil R/at Saki Road, Jaybhairav Nagar, Dhule, Dist. Dhule-424001.

¶93Dinesh Arun Wagh, Age 35, Occ. Nil R/at Saikrupa Colony, Rajendra Nagar, Wadavali, Dhule, Dist-Dhule, 424005.

¶94Vithal Vilas Sherlekar Age 33, Occ. Nil, R/at Sherle, Nagdhuriwadi, Hose No. 886, Tal. Sawantwadi, Dist. Sindhudurga, 416514

¶95Girish Ganpat Sherlekar Age 38, Occ. Nil R/at Sawantwadi, Shetkarwadi, Sherle, Dist.-Sindhudurga, 416514.

¶96Arjun Vasudev Jadhav Age 37, Occ. Nil R/at Near Samaj Mandir, Kaleli, Sindhudurga, 416519.

¶97Komal Onkar Khajanwadkar Age 31, Occ. Nil R/at Ingale Wadi, Kotakmate, Tal. Devgad, Dist. Sindhudurga, 416611.

¶98Prabhudas Laxman Aajgaonkar Age 36, Occ. Nil R/at Wayari, Kalavati Mandir, Malwan, Sindhudurga – 416606.

¶99Dinesh Shivdas Morye Age 32, Occ. Nil R/at Kankavali, Sindhudurga, 416602.

¶100Chetan Chandrakant Poojari Age 31, Occ. Nil R/at Pural, Tal. Devgad, Dist. Sindhudurga. 416805.

¶101Rakhi Ravind Munj Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Ambrad, Tal – Kudal, Dist. Sindhudurga, 416628.

¶102Tejal Namdev Teli Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Kasaba Waghota, Tal. Devgad, Dist. Sindhudurga-416804.

¶103Nilesh Prakash Tirlotkar Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Gadewadi, Khurshi, Dist. Sindhudurga, 416805

¶104Shubhangi Manohar Tagde Age 33, Occ. Nil R/at Deori, Tal. Deori, Sanjay Nagar, Gondiya, 441901

¶105Rajeshkumar Bidharam Chute Age 34, Occ. Nil R/at Naigaon Kalyan, Gondiya, 441601

¶106Nitin Rameshwar Kumbhalkar Age 33, Occ. Nil R/at Kurparr, Purada, Deori, Dist – Gondiya, 441902.

¶107Maheshwari Tilkachand Turkar Age 38, Occ. Nil R/at Nilaj, Ward No. 1, Dasgaon Book, Gondiya – 441614.

¶108Govindprasad Ashok Tembre Age 35, Occ. Nil R/at Shastri Tiroda, Gajanan Mandir Jawal, Gondiya – 441911

¶109Gunjan Kishor Barne Age 23, Occ. Nil R/at Titora, Gondiya, 441911 PUNE

¶110Anjali Dilip Khedkar Age 31, Occ. Nil R/at Pirangut, Tal. Mulshi. Dist. Pune, 412115

¶111Sonali Rajaram Mokashi Age 32, Occ. Nil R/at Katfal, Pune, Dist. Pune, 413133.

¶112Seema Pandurang Shinde Age 33, Occ. Nil R/at Indapur, Dist. Pune, 413106

¶113Supriya Suresh Jadhav Age 33, Occ. Nil R/at Tal. Purandar, Saswad, Dist. Pune 412301

¶114Shital Vijaysing Ratjput Age 37, Occ. Nil R/at Ravet, Tal – Haveli, Dist.-Pune, 412101.

¶115Prashant Vasudev Jori Age 31, Occ. Nil R/at Kambhut, Tal-Shirur, Dist.-Pune, 410504.

¶116Pradip Malikarjun Lohar, Age 33, Occ. Nil R/at Aundh Camp, Pune, Dist. - Pune, 411027.

¶117Manisha Mahadev Pansare Age 39, Occ. Nil R/at Hadapsar, Flat No. B-401, Pune City, Pune, 411028

¶118Sumaya Imran Mulla Age 35, Occ. Nil R/at Bhosari, Chakrapani, Vasahat Road, Dist. Pune, 411039.

¶119Pratidnya Shashikant Nalawade Age 42, Occ. Nil R/at Nirvangi, Pune, Dist. Pune, 413114.

¶120Suhasini Sagar Dhapare Age 33, Occ. Nil R/at Ambedkar Nagar, Tal – Karad, Dist. Satara-415124.

¶121Tejaswi Mohan Dhaware Age 35, Occ. Nil R/at padegaon, Tal-Khandala, Dist. Satara, 415004

¶122Pankaj Devram Gedam Age 29, Occ. Nil R/at Dongargaon, Tal-Kul, Dist. Chandrapur ..PETITIONERS VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra. Through the Secretary of Department of Education & Sports, Mantralaya, Mumbai – 400 001.

¶2Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State, Pune. Central Building, Pune-01.

¶3Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State Exam Council,

¶17Dr. Ambedkar Marg, Near Lal Temple, Pune ..RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.2585 OF 2024 Ravindra s/o Babasaheb Khedkar, Age:- 32 years, Occ. Nil, R/o Chichpur Ijade, Tq. Pathardi, Dist. Ahmednagar ..PETITIONER VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Sports and Education Department Mantralaya, Mumbai-400032.

¶2The Commissioner, Maharashtra State Council of Examination, 17, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Road, Camp Pune-411001

¶3The Commissioner of Education (MS) Central Building Pune ..RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.2869 OF 2024

¶1Rameshwar Bhikchand Ghitre Age:31 years, Occ:Education R/o. Plot no.37 Raje sambahaji colony Jadhav wadi Jalgaon Road Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar(Aurangabad)

¶2Shubhangi Ramesh Chaudhari Age-34 years Occup-private job R/o. C/o Ananad Ramesh pande. Kapidiya State near bus stand Hingoli Dist. Hingoli

¶3Aditay Purushottam Penore Age-30 year, Occup-Education R/o-Antule nagara kola bypass Hingoli Dist Hingoli

¶4Mahadev Amabads Dhaknae Age-31 years, Occup-Education R/o – At Post Sondevmal Tal and District Jalna

¶5Dattatraya Kisan Sumbar Age-33 years, Occup-Education R/o-At Mandava Post Sawkheda Tal Gangapur and District Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar(Aurangabad)

¶6Suhas Gopinath Bhoyar Age-39 years, Occup-housewife R/o-Parvati Nagar Vidypith Parisar Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar(Aurangabad)

¶7Amit Kailas Khandare Age-33 years, Occup-Education R/o-Bhawshing Pura Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar(Aurangabad)

¶8Anil Karbhari Malkar Age-34 years, Occup-Education R/o-At post Tadpimpalgaon Tal Kannad, District Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar (Aurangabad) ..PETITIONERS VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary School Education and Sports Department Mantralaya, Mumbai

¶2The Commissioner (Education), Maharashtra State, Pune, Having office at Annibesant Road, District Pune.

¶3The Pavatri Portal Working under the The Commissioner (Education) Pune Tal and District Pune

¶4Central Board Of Secondary Education New Delhi

¶5Maharashtra State Council Of Examination Pune Taluka And District Pune

¶6National Council of Teacher Education Through Chariperson Office At-G-7 Dwarka Near Metro Station New Delhi ..RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.3707 OF 2024

¶1Shaikh Mazharuddin Shaikh Fayazuddin Age: 33 years, Occu: Nil R/o: Plot no.4, Jam Nagar, Jalgaon Tq. & Dist. Jalgaon

¶2Iram Kauser Mohammed Azam Age 29 years, Occu. Nil, R/o: Near Sadad Masjid, Azam Colony, Roshan Gate, Ch. Sambhajinagar Tq. & Dist. Ch. Sambhajinagar

¶3Shaikh Feroz Shaikh Hasham Age 39 years, Occu. Nil, R/o At Nanja, Tq. Bhokardan District-Jalna.

¶4Shaikh Wazira Begum Shaikh Moin, Age 31 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Kumar Galli Tq. & District-Jalna.

¶5Khan Naziya Tasneem Azhar Sarfaraz Khan, Age 39 years, Occu. Nil, R/o At Present Biloli Tq. & Dist Nanded

¶6Mariya Imtiyaz Ahmad Age 33 years, Occu. Nil, R/o At Present Motipura, Near Baidpura Tq & District Jalna.

¶7Rizwana Begum Rahmat Khan Age 32 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Gangkhed Road Parbhani, Tq. & Dist. Parbhani,

¶8Mohd Sharique Mohd Rafique Age 35 years, Occu. Nil, R/o At Present Akbari Chauk Biyabani, Tq. & district Aurangabad,

¶9Gazala Murtuz Nadaf, Age 31 years, Occu. Nil, R/o At present Nilanga, Tq. Nilanga District Latur

¶10Sana Jilani Mujawar, Age 31 years, Occu. Nil, R/o. At Present Gajanan Nagar, Dhule Tq. & District Dhule,

¶11Rabiya Sultana Mohammed Nazim, Age 32 years, Occu. Nil, R/o. At Present Mastar Colony Jalgaon, Tq & District Jalgaon,

¶12Mirza Faizan Baig Mirza Rahman Baig, Age 29 years, Occu. Nil, R/o At Present Opp Sara Aparment Sillod, Tq. Sillod & Dist. Aurangabad.

¶13Shahida Asifkhan Shaikh, Age 33 years, Occu, Nil, R/o At Present Chand Mahel, Ahmednagar Tq & District Ahmednagar.

¶14Khamsa Fatema Mohammad Anwar, Age 30 years, Occu. Nil, R/o At Present Mastar Colony Jalgaon Tq. & District Jalgaon.

¶15Mohammad Shakeeb Akhtar Mohammad Jalil, Age: 37 years, Occu. Nil, R/o At Present Saudagar Mohalla, Waluj Tq & District Aurangabad

¶16Sumayya Bano Riyaz Ah Age 37 years, Occu. Nil, R/O 40 Feet Road, Chalisgaon Tq. Chalisgaon Dist Jalgaon

¶17Sumayya Begum Mohammed Abdul Saleem Age 36 years, Occu. Nil, R/O Subhash Nagar Dharmabad Tq Dharmabad Dist Nanded

¶18Mohammad Wasif Mohammad Ghazi Age 31 years, Occu. Nil, R/O At Present Sajjikha Pura Adgaon Bk Tq. Vaijapur Dist Aurangabad

¶19Shaikh Munna Shaikh Zameer Age 33 years, Occu. Nil R/O At present, Near Noor Hospital, Bhokardhan Tq. Bhokardhan & Dist. Jalna

¶20Farhat Jabeen Abdul Majeed Age 36 years, Occu. Nil R/O. At Present Ganim Pura Karbala Road Nanded Tq. & Dist Nanded

¶21Mansuri Shireen Bano Rafeeq Ahmed Age 31 years, Occu. Nil R/O. At present Maqsood Colony, Near Shahi Masjid, Jalna. Tq. & Dist. Jalna

¶22Shahid Ameen Anees Ahmad Khan Age 33 years, Occu. Nil R/O. At present Peth Mohalla Parli V. TQ.Parli V. DIST Beed

¶23Qureshi Aijaz Khan Burhan Khan Age 30 years, Occu. Nil R/O. Qureshi Mohalla Bhokardan Tq. Bhokardan Dist Jalna

¶24Saleha Jabeen Shahid Anwar Quraishi Age 28 years, Occu. Nil R/o Near Quraishi Masjid Shivna Tq Sillod Dist Aurangabad

¶25Farheen Talat Mohammed Aslam Age 29 years, Occu. Nil R/O. At present Ansar Ganj Agra Road, Dhule, Tq. & Dist. Dhule

¶26Nilofer Begum Mohammed Rafeeq Age 32 years, Occu. Nil R/O Umar Colony Degloor Naka Itwar Tq. & Dist Nanded

¶27Aasim Ali syed Sharafat Ali Age 22 years, Occu. Nil R/O. At Present Khateeb Pura, Gangakhed Tq. Gangakhed Dist Parbhani

¶28Sayyad Moeen Ali Sayyad Mohsin Ali Age 23 years, Occu. Nil R/O. At present Khateeb Pura, Gangakhed Tq. Gangakhed Dist Parbhani

¶29Ali Rehan Syed Zameer Ali Age 22 years, Occu. Nil R/O. At Present Khateeb Pura, Gangakhed Tq. Gangakhed Dist Parbhani

¶30Sahoor Ahmad Masroor Ahmad Age 32 years, Occu. Nil R/o At Present Firdous Colony, Mehmoodpura, Partur Tq Partur Dist. Jalna

¶31Shaikh Ghufran Shaikh Jafar Age 23 years, Occu. Nil R/o At present Ballochpura Bhusawal Tq Bhusawal Dist Jalgaon

¶32Syed Khatija Begum Tajammul Hasan Peerzada Age 31 years, Occu. Nil R/o At Present Peerzad Lane Vaijapur Tq. Vaijapur Dist Aurangabad

¶33Saba Kauser Mohammad Khaleel Age 38 years, Occu. Nil R/o Momin Mohalla Ajanta Tq Sillod Dist Aurangabad

¶34Shaikh Fatema Begum Abdul Kareem Age 36 years, Occu. Nil R/o Syed Chand Dargha Nideban Ves Udgir Tq. Udgir Dist Latur

¶35Nasreen Bano Mohammed Nasir Age 41 years, Occu. Nil R/o Aref Colony Aurangabad Tq & Dist Aurangabad

¶36Nilofar Mahibub So Nadaf Age 39 years, Occu. Nil R/o At. Present Noorani Masjid Beed Road, Ambejogai Tq Ambejogai Dist Beed

¶37Nagma Shereen Shabbir Ahmed Age 34 years, Occu. Nil R/o. At present Abubakar Colony, Parbhani Tq. & Dist Parbhani

¶38Shaista Jabeen Shaikh Naseem Age 29 years, Occu. Nil R/o At Present Rohila Galli, Latur, Tq. & Dist. Latur

¶39Rabiya Bano Mohammad Zahur Ansari Age 32 years, Occu. Nil R/O Mohammadi Nagar Deopur Tq. Dist Dhule

¶40Aaliya Tazeen Sajid Baig Age 27 years, Occu. Nil R/o At Present Habib Nagar Bhokardan Tq Bhodardan Dist Jalna

¶41Iram Gulfishan Mohammed Javeed Age 25 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Itwara, Tq. & District Nanded.

¶42Nehal Nisar Maniyar Age 28 years, occu. Nil, R/o Peth Mohalla, Tq. Parli District-Beed.

¶43Shaikh Aafrin Sultana Khwaja Mainuddin Age 37 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Roshan pura belepir Nagar, Tq. District-Beed.

¶44Tashfeen Ahmad Abrar Ahmad, Age 27 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Slik Milk Colony, Ch. Sambahjinagar. Tq. & Dist. Ch. Sambhajinagar.

¶45Mohammad Baseet Abdul Naeem, Age 29 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Momin Pura, Ch. Sambahjinagar. Tq. & Dist. Ch. Sambahjinagar.

¶46Shabana Yasmeen Noor Khan Age 27 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Rahim nagar jalna, Tq & District Jalna.

¶47Farhana Bano Syed Mushtaque Age 40 years, Occu. Nil. R/o Khadkpura, Tq. & Dist. Nanded.

¶48Asma Farheen Mohd Shafi Age 31 years, occu. Nil, R/o Usmanpura, Ch. Sambahjinagar., Tq. & District Ch. Sambhajinagar

¶49Naziya Akhtar Nazimuddin, Age 43 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Beed Bypass, Ch. Sambahjinagar. Tq. & District Chh. Sambhajinagar.

¶50Shaikh Adnan Jaleel Ahemad, Age 27 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Mirza Colony, Sillod Tq Sillod. District Ch. Sambhajinagar

¶51Ansari Muhammad Zubair Khalid Husain, Age 32 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Momin Pura, Ch. Sambahjinagar. Tq & District Chh. Sambhajinagar

¶52Shaikh Intekhab Aalam Mohammad Rafique Age 30 years, Occu. Nil, At Post Mehrun, Jalgaon Tq & District Jalgaon

¶53Aslam Khan Ahmed Khan, Age 32 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Jubile park, Ch. Sambahjinagar. Tq & District Chattrapat Sambhajinagar.

¶54Aafreen Shafeeque Ahmad, Age 32 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Dhar road, Tq. & District Parbhani

¶55Anam Shaikh Shakeel, Age 23 years, Occu, Nil, R/o Sahagaj, Ch. Sambahjinagar. Tq & District Chattrapat Sambhajinagar

¶56Shaikh Ashique Shaikh Gani Age 30 years, Occu, Nil, At Present, R/O. Nashirabad Tq. Bhusawal, Dist. Jalgaon

¶57Parvez Ali Zulfequar Ali Sayyed Age 35 years, Occu. Nil, R/o At Present, Room no. 487 Hazar Kholi Dhule, Tq Dist Dhule

¶58Aafrin Bano Ahmed Khan Age 30 years, Occu. Nil, R/O Nashirabad Tq. Bhusawal Dist Jalgaon

¶59Ansari Faizan Ahmad Riyaz Ahmad Age 31 years, Occu. Nil, R/O Mahada Plot Super Market Dhule Tq & Dist Dhule

¶60Abdul Karim Abdul Munaf Age 35 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Farhat Palace Pahur Galli Jamner Tq Jamner Dist Jalgaon ..PETITIONERS VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya Mumbai-32

¶2The Commissioner of Education Maharashtra State, Central Building, Pune ..RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.3916 OF 2024

¶1Nilesh Shivaji Patil Age-34 yrs, Occ-Nil R/at-45, Akahay Colony, Walwadi, Shivar, Gondur road, Deopur, Dhule-424002

¶2Kavita Pitamber Patil Age-37 years, Occ-Nil R/at-Amalner, Janave, Jalgaon-425401

¶3Himani Arvind Gajbe Age-33 yrs, Occ-Nil R/at-Ho-No-30, Shrey Niwas Hiwarkheda Road, Javhar Colony, Kannad, Aurangabad-431103

¶4VijayKumar Bhikaji Pundge Age-40 yrs, Occ-Nil R/at-Aundha (Nagnath), Dhegaj, Hingoli-411027

¶5Naresh Arjun Kamble Age-35 Years, Occ-Nil R/at-Mogara, Shoini TW, Lakhani, Bhandara-441809

¶6Arvind Sriram Sangale Age-35 Years, Occ-Nil R/at-Jaulka, Dusarbid, Sindkhed Raja, Buldana - 443308 ..PETITIONERS VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary Department of Education and Sports Mantralaya, Mumbai-400001

¶2Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State, Pune, Central Building, Pune-01

¶3Commissioner Maharashtra State Exam Council, 17, Dr. Ambedkar Marg, Near Lal temple, Pune ..RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.4200 OF 2024

¶1Vaishali Bhikchand Ghitre Age: 25 Years Occ: Education R/O, Plot No.37, Rajesambhaji Colony, Jadhavwadi, Aurangabad

¶2Anuradha Jaysing Ghule Age: 29 Years, Occ: Education R/O, At Ghulewadi Post Sautada, Tq Patoda, Beed

¶3Barkabai Narayan Guldagad Age : 34 Years, Occ: Education R/O, At Post Patewadi, Tq Karjat, Dist Ahmednagar

¶4Dattarao Apparao Waware Age: 34 Years, Occ: Education R/O, At Post Tadkalas, Tq Purna, Dist Parbhani

¶5Trupti Kondiba Tale Age:30, Occ : Education R/O Gajanan Mandir, Tirupati Nagar, Parbhani

¶6Swati Chandrabhan Pabale Age : 33 Years, Occ: Education R/O, Amrutnagar, Ghulewadi, Sangamner, Ahmednagar.

¶7Sushma Shivaji Kele Age : 30 Years, Occ : Education R/O, Kelewadi, Taluka Vashi, Dist Osmanabad

¶8Pranoti Purushottam Ravekar Age: 30 Years, Occ : Education R/O, Pundlik Nagar, Garkheda, Aurangabad

¶9Chitrasen Udelal Gautam Age: 33 Years, Occ: Education R/O, Pahadsingpura, University Campus, Aurangabad ..PETITIONERS VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary School Education and Sports Department Mantralaya, Mumbai

¶2The Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State, Pune, Having office at Annibesant Road, District Pune.

¶3The Pavitra Portal Working under the Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State, Pune.

¶4National Council of Teachers Education Through Chairperson Office at G-7, Dwarka, Near Metro Station, New Delhi.

¶5Central Board of Secondary Education New Delhi.

¶6Maharashtra State Council of Examination Pune.

¶7The Deputy Director of Education Regional Office, Aurangabad ..RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.4827 OF 2024

¶1Mohammed Masihuddin Farooqi Mohammed Shamshuddin Farooqui Age 33 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Pension Pura, Hingoli, Tq. & District Hingoli.

¶2Mohammad Ubaidurrehman Abdul Razzaque, Age 32 years, occu. Nil, R/o Shanti Nagar, District Chattrapati Sambhajinagar.

¶3Samreen Zakir Patel, Age: 29 years, Occu. Nil, O/o Ajna Nagar, Khokadpura, Chattrapati Sambhajinagar.

¶4Lazampasha Shabbeerpasha Sahebwale, Age: 39 years, Occu. Nil, Near Aurangzeb Alamgir Madarsa, Kannad, Chattrapati Sambhajinagar.

¶5Nasreen Yasmeen Yusuf Khan, Age 32 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Usman Pura, Chattrapati Sambahjinagar.

¶6Mohseen Ahmad Chote Saheb, Age 28 years, Occu. Nil, R/o City Chowk, District Chattrapati Sambhajinagar.

¶7Rana Tabassum Syed Waheed, Age 37 years, Occu. Nil, R/o in front Bus Stand, Sajja Road, Jalna, Tq. & Dist. Jalna

¶8Nazneen Sultana Syed Aarif, Age 32 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Kangara Colony, Tq. Aurangabad, District Chattrapati Sambhajinagar

¶9Syed Waquar Syed Wasim, Age 34 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Beed Bypass, District Chattrapati Sambhajinagar.

¶10Shaikh Nasir Shaikh Mushtaque, Age 25 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Siddharat Nagar, Jalgaon.

¶11Mohammad Atique Khan Nasir Khan, Age 29 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Chikhali, Tq. Chopada, District Jalgaon

¶12Fatema Begum Khiyamoddin Khatib, Age 26 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Roshan Colony, Hingoli, Tq. & Dist. Hingoli

¶13Mohammad Javed Mohammad Shabbir, Age 35 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Shivaji Nagar, District Chattrapat Sambhajinagar.

¶14Mariya Aiman Mohammed Samiyouddin, Age 26 years, Occu. Nil, R/O Subedar nagar, Tq. & District Parbhani

¶15Shaikh Sharique Shaikh Shakir, Age 32 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Harsul – Harsul – Pisadevi Road, Chattrapat Sambhajinagar District Chattrapat Sambhajinagar.

¶16Farheen Begum Mirza Nayeem Baig, Age 29 years, Occu. Nil, R/O Bodhegaon, Tq. Shevgaon, District Ahmednagar.

¶17Naved Patel Yunus Patel, Age 30 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Shivajinagar Tq. Ambad, District Jalna.

¶18Yahaya Tabassum Basheer Ahemad Khan, Age 25 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Kali Peth Basmat, District Hingoli

¶19Reshma Parveen Ishaque Khan, Age 37 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Pension pura, Hingoli, Tq. & Dist. Hingoli.

¶20Nihal Mushtaque Patel Age 32 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Mahegaon, Tq. Rahuri, District Ahmednagar.

¶21Mohammad Aasim Makhdum Mohammad Aziz Ulla, Age 28 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Masoom Colony, Parbhani.

¶22Mo. Faizan Shaikh Haroon, Age 27 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Shekta, Tq. Shevgaon, District Ahmednagar.

¶23Shaiban Iqbal Azimuddin, Age 25 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Khokadpura, Tq. & District Chattrapati Sambhajinagar.

¶24Wasim Ahmad Abdul Hameed, Age 36 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Noor shah mohalla bazar patta near dehli gate at post jafferabad, Tq. & Dist. Jalna.

¶25Yaqoob Husain Inayat Husain Wallampalli, Age 33 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Wahida Colony, Sillod, Tq. Sillod District Chattrapati Sambhajinagar.

¶26Salman Khan Ayaz Khan, Age 32 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Pedgaon, Tq. & Dist. Parbhani.

¶27Shaikh Azeem Shaikh Manzoor, Age 33 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Shivna Tq. Shirur (K), District Beed.

¶28Qayyum Mirasaheb Hatti, Age 32 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Jainpur, tq. Nevasa, District Ahmednagar.

¶29Noorussubha Ayyub Khan, Age 26 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Bhavsingpura, Tq. & Dist. Chattrapati Sambhajinagar.

¶30Mahamad Arif Mubarak Patel, Age 34 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Sahida Nagar, Jalgaon, District Jalgaon.

¶31Sanaullah Khan Habeeb Khan, Age 31 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Loni Galli, Tq. Karjat, District Ahmednagar.

¶32Mohd Aatif Faisal Mohd Aarif, Age 30 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Adharshi Corner, Shanti Nagar, Chattrapati Sambhajinagar. District Chattrapati Sambhajinagar.

¶33Lubna Firdous Syed Muzammil, Age 25 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Bhaginghar, Tq. Paithan, District Chattrapati Sambhajinagar.

¶34Mohsina Qasimsab Bagwan, Age 35 years, Occu. Nil, R/o R/o Shrigonda, Tq. Shrigonda, District Ahmednagar

¶35Mohd Irfan A Sattar Age 34 years, occu. Nil, R/o Mominpura, District Chattrapati Sambhajinagar.

¶36Mohammad Saquib Mohammad Abulais, Age 29 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Saprewadi, Tq. Chalisgaon, Tq. Dhule.

¶37Shaikh Sagheer Shaikh Basheer, Age 29 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Kohinoor, Tq. Karjat, District Ahmednagar

¶38Shaikh Juned Shaikh Basheer, Age 28 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Kamgar Colony, Tq. & District Jalna.

¶39Nargis Anjum Gulsher Khan, Age 43 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Asara Apartment Manik Nagar, Chattrapati Sambhajinagar.

¶40Asma Parveen Mohammad Salim, Age 26 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Gulshan Nagar, Tq. Ambad, District Jalna.

¶41Mohammed Nazim Mohammed Saleem, Age 23 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Parijat Colony, Jatpura Road, Hanuman Nagar, Ahmednagar.

¶42Bagmaroo Qaiser Begum Habib Ahmed, Age 33 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Vivekanand Colony, Ausa Road, Latur, Tq. & Dist. Latur.

¶43Saba Tabassum Abdul Wase, Age 32 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Momin pura near city Hotel, Beed, Tq. & Dist. Beed.

¶44Syed Aamer Syed Zafar, Age 28 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Mayur Park, Aurangabad Road, Jalna, Tq. & Dist. Jalna. ..PETITIONERS VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra Through its Principal Secretary, School Education & Sports Deptt. Mantralaya, Mumbai-400 032.

¶2The Commissioner for School Education & Sports Deptt., Government of Maharashtra, Pune. ..RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.5354 OF 2024

¶1Swati Laxman Dhapate @ Swati Mangesh Dhamal Age-36 years, Occ-Nil R/at – Kateri Peth, Asawali, Tal-Khandala, Dist-Satara-412802

¶2Priti Pritam Potdar Age-35 Years, Occ-Nil R/at – 8 Shivshankar Residency, Satara, Shanivar Peth 1059 1060 B, Near Kale Plaza, Satara-415002

¶3Yogita Vishnu Mahimkar @Yogita Dilip Yevale Age-33 years, Occ-Nil Girvi Tal-Indapur, Girvi, Pimpri Bk, Pune-413103

¶4Durga Vishwanath Mahale Age-32 yrs, Occ-Nil R/at – Near Gajanan Maharaj Temple, Sant Gajanan Nagar, Nagar Tas Road, Teacher Colony, Tal-Malegaon, Washim-444503

¶5Rakesh Gopinath Turankar Age-34 years, Occ-Nil R/at-Ward No.3, Usgaon, Cement nagar, Chandrapur-442502

¶6Dipti Tanaji Waghmode @ Dipti Valay Pise Age-38 years, Occ-Nil R/at – Kamal Kunj Vidya Nagar, Badar Road, Nilanga, Latur – 413521

¶7Komal Gopal Umale Age-33 yrs, Occ-Nil R/at – Uti Kh, Post – Jalgaon, Jamod, Dist – Buldhana - 443402

¶8Jyoti Arjunrao Bachhav Age-37 yrs, Occ-Nil R/at – Patel Colony, Near Radhakrishna Mandir, Yeola, Nashik - 423401

¶9Sandhyarani Mohan Mane Age-34 yrs, Occ – Nil R/at – Mane Galli, Nandeshwar, Bhose, Mangalwedha, Solapur - 413322

¶10Jyoti Gorakhnath Gaikwad Age-36 yrs, Occ-Nil R/at – Gavhali Road, Sakore, Sakore, Nashik – 423106

¶11Shital Nilkant Kendre Age-36 years, Occ-Nil R/at – flat No. 303, Devbhumi Apartment Satkar Sthal west Wada Road, Rajguru Nagar, Tal – Khed, Pune - 410505 ..PETITIONERS VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary Department of School Education And Sports Mantralaya, Mumbai-400001

¶2The Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State, Pune, Central Building, Pune-01

¶3Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State Exam Council, 17, Dr Ambedkar Marg, Near Lal temple, Pune ..RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.5646 OF 2024

¶1Hassana Khanam Wadood Ahmed Khan Age: 36 years, Occu: Nil R/o: Nagar Naka Road, Hyder Baugh, Nanded Tq. & Dist. Nanded

¶2Mirza Uzma Fatema Mirza Shafeeque Baig Age 29 years, Occu. Nil, R/o: Near Sadad Masjid, Azam Colony, roshan Gate, Ch. Sambhajinagar Tq. & Dist. Ch. Sambhajinagar

¶3Asma Akhtar Bi A. Hakeem Shaikh Age: 32 years Occu: Nil R/O. Ghat Road, Behind Chhajed Oil Mill Chalisgaon Tq. Chalisgaon Dist. Jalgaon. ..PETITIONERS VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya Mumbai-32

¶2The Commissioner of Education Maharashtra State, Central Building, Pune ..RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.6608 OF 2024

¶1Madhuri Baburao Patharkar Age: 35 years, Occ: Education R/o. Ashti At post Kada Shiv Chhatripati Chowk District Beed

¶2Deepak Baliram Kekan Age-31 years Occup-Nil R/o. At Chatgaon Post Dindrud Tal Dharur Dist Beed ..PETITIONERS VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary School Education and Sports Department Mantarlya Mumbai

¶2The Commissioner (Education), Maharashtra State Pune Having office at Annibesant Road, District Pune

¶3The Pavatri Portal Working under the The commissioner (Education) Pune Tal and District Pune

¶4Central Board of Secondary Education New Delhi

¶5Maharashtra State Council of Examination Pune Taluka And District Pune

¶6National Council of Teacher Education Through Chairperson Office At-G-7 Dwarka Near Metro Station New Delhi ..RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.7079 OF 2024 Shaikh Abdul Laeeque Sk Abdul Lateef Age: 27 years, Occu: Private Job R/o: Galli No.5, Rahmaniya Colony Aurangabad, (Chh. Sambhajinagar) Dist. Aurangabad, (Chh. Sambhajinagar) ..PETITIONER VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya Mumbai-32

¶2The Commissioner of Education Maharashtra State, Central Building, Pune ..RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.7128 OF 2024

¶1Nitin S/o Virbhadra Swami, Age : 34 years, Occu: Education, R/o Near Shivaji College 3266 Shobha Niwas Renapur, Tal. Renapur, District Latur.

¶2Ganesh S/o Ramchandra Khobare Age : 33 years, Occu: Education, R/o Narkhed, Taluka Mohal, District Solapur

¶3Arvindkumar S/o Prabhu Misal, Age : 26 years, Occu: Education, R/o Datta Nagar, Misal Nivas, Beed, Taluka and District Beed.

¶4Amol S/o Gajanan Raut, Age : 29 years, Occu: Education, R/o Indira Nagar, Shioni, Chircharalband, Gondiya, Taluka & Dist. Gondiya.

¶5Chetna D/o Laxmanrao Walokar, Age : 31 years, Occu: Education, R/o Plot No.49, Karodi Road, Near Hanuman Mandir, Zingabai VTC Mankapur, Post. Mankapur, Tal. Mankapur, Dist. Nagpur

¶6Jaishri D/o Nagraj Desale Age : 34 years, Occu: Nil, R/o Malich Gorane, Taluka Sindkhed, District Dhule. ..PETITIONERS VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, School Education and Sports Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai

¶2The Commissioner of Education, Maharashtra State, Pune, Having office at Annibesant Road, District Pune

¶3The Pavitra Portal, Working under the The Commissioner of Education, Pune./ Taluka and District Pune.

¶4The Chairman, Central Board of Secondary Education, Shiksha Kendra, 2, Community Center, Preet Vihar, New Delhi.

¶5Maharashtra State Council of Examination, Pune through Chairperson, Office at – Balchitrawani, Shivajinagar, Pune-411004 ..RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.7311 OF 2024 Shaikh Naseem Begum Shaikh Nizamoddin Age: 40 years, Occu: Nil R/o: Bhuyee Galli, Parli-V, Tq. Parli-V. Dist. Beed ..PETITIONER VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra Through Secretary, School Education Department Mantralaya Mumbai-32

¶2The Commissioner of Education Maharashtra State, Central Building, Pune ..RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.8246 OF 2024 Nusrat bano Mohd Haneef Sheikh Age : 41 years, Occu: Private Job At present R/o : "Admission Carrier", Aurangpura, Aurangabad (Ch. Sambhajinagar) Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad (Ch. Sambhajinagar) ..PETITIONER VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya Mumbai-32

¶2The Commissioner of Education Maharashtra State, Central Building, Pune ..RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.8483 OF 2024

¶1Arvind S/O Bhujanga Pundge Age: 36 Year, Occ: Education R/O. Plot No. 338, Near Shankar Theator Pravin Nagar, Hingoli-431513

¶2Asawari D/O Ashok Lole Age: 43 years, Occ: Education R/O. 5/39 Shahu corner, Narayan Peth Ichalkarnji Tq. Hatkangle, Dist. Kolhapur-416115

¶3Sharad S/o. Popat Gharate Age: 41 Years, Occ: Education R/O. At Post Kusumba Tq. Dist. Dhule

¶4Amol S/o. Suresh Kamble Age: 37 Years, Occ: Education R/O. Mhaisalves Panchshil Chowk, Miraj, Tq. Miraj, Dist. Sangli.

¶5Vishal S/o. Dattatray Jadhav Age: 36 years, Occ: Education R/O. Galli No.1, At Post Kusumba, Tq. Dist. Dhule-424302

¶6Jyotsana D/O Ramdas Fulluke Age: 38 Years, Occ: Education R/O. At Dighori, Post Murmadi Tq. Lakhani Dist. Bhandara.

¶7Sonam D/O Balkrushna Baviskar Age: 33 Years, Occ: Education R/O. Flat No. A/B 101, Kate Residency Near Dapoli, Tq. Dist. Pune-411012

¶8Sandip S/O Shamrao Gondane Age: 33 Years, Occ: Education R/O. At Post Devri, Tq. Devri, Dist. Gondiya-441901

¶9Pavan S/O Gangadhar Koturwar Age: 31 Years, Occ: Education R/O. At Dhanora Post Karkeli, Tq. Dharmabad, Dist. Nanded

¶10Ganesh S/O Dattatray Chaudhari Age: 31 Years, Occ: Education R/O. At post Kusumba Tq. Dist. Dhule-424302

¶11Rupesh S/O Devidas Katkar Age: 31 Years, Occ: Education R/O. Dolamba Chikhalizara Tq. Digras Dist. Yawatmal-4485203

¶12Siddharth S/O Mansing More Age: 33 Years, Occ: Education R/O. At Post Dudhedadi, Tq. Phaltan Dist. Satara-415523

¶13Sumita D/O Sopan Akhade Age: 42 Years, Occ: Education R/O. At Post Kombhali Tq. Karjat, Dist. Ahmednagar ..PETITIONERS VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary School Education and Sports Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai

¶2The Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State, Pune. Having office at Annibesant Road, District Pune.

¶3The Chairman, Central Board of Secondary Education Shiksha Kendra-2 Community Center Preet Vihar, Delhi

¶4National Council of Teachers Education Through Chairperson Office at G-7, Dwarka, Near Metro Station, New Delhi. ..RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.8560 OF 2024

¶1Vitthal Ramchandra Sargar Age-35, Occ – Nil, At – Udanwadi, Tal – Sangola, Dist – Solapur – 413307

¶2Bharati Basaweshwar Gayali Age-34, Occ:-Nil, R/at-Priyasarshani chowk, Javala, Tal-Sangola, Dist-Solapur-413309.

¶3Mahesh Haridas Dhole Age-31, OCC-Nil, R/at-Kamlapur, Tal-Sangola, Dist – Solapur - 413307.

¶4Girish Dilip Surawanshi Age-32, OCC-Nil, R/at-Akluj, Tal-Malshiras, Dist-Solapur-413101

¶5Vidya Nagnath Jadhav Age-32, OCC-Nil, R/at-Randivewadi, Solapur - 413209

¶6Ashok Rajendra Salampure Age-36, OCC-Nil R/at-Sangam, Po-Niranashingpur, Tal-Malshiras, Dist – Solapur – 413211

¶7Prashant Uttam Burande Age-32, OCC-Nil R/at-Sangole, Tal-Sangola, Dist-Solapur, 413307

¶8Sukeshani Kamlakar Bhalerao Age-34, OCC-Nil R/at-Chare, Tal-Barshi, Dist-Solapur, 413409

¶9Huljute Mukund Asram Age-36, OCC-Nil, R/at-Kharwandi, Kasar, Dist-Ahmadnagar, 414113

¶10Andure Vaihav Vinayak Age-32, OCC-Nil, R/at-Pathardi, Kharvandi, Dist-Ahmadnagar, 414113

¶11Pravin Vishwanath Saravade Age-36, OCC-Nil, R/at-Ganesh Khadu, karkhana, Kedgavnagar, Dist-Ahmadnagar

¶12Khedkar Ashok Suryabhan Age-31, OCC-Nil R/at-Munguswade, Dist-Ahmadnagar, 414113

¶13Ashwini Vishwanath Gosewade Age-35, OCC-Nil R/at-Subhash ward Kardi, Mohadi, Bhandara, Dist-Bhandara-441909

¶14Saurabh Suresh Khobragade Age-28, OCC-Nil, R/at-Bramhi, Konda Kosra, Bhandara, Dist-Bhandara – 441908

¶15Sunil Diliprao Kande Age-34, OCC-Nil R/at-Wakadi, Bid, Dist-Beed, 431519

¶16Vishnu Sakharam Munde Age-34, OCC-Nil R/at-Chikhalbeed, Tal-Wadwani, Dist-Beed,

¶17Nanasaheb Namdeo Wadane Age-34, OCC-Nil, r/at-Wadgaon Gunda, Po-Adgaon, Dist-Beed,

¶18Shilpa Angadrao Kale Age-34, OCC-Nil, R/at-Pancharatn Residency, Datta Nagar, Beed, Dist-Beed, 431122

¶19Vivek Dagadu Buva Age-34, OCC-Nil R/at Borgaonphata, Ghotavade, Dist-Kolhapur,

¶20Dipika Ashok Kumbhar Age-35, OCC-Nil, R/at-Nehru Road, Jaysinghpur, Dist-Kolhapur,

¶21Ujjwala Krushna Gawade Age-37, OCC-Nil R/at-Samarth Nagar, SSC Board Kolhapur, Dist-Kolhapur - 416008

¶22Rupali Bharat Shete Age-43, OCC-Nil, R/at-Near Marathi School Kololi, Po-Kololi, Dist-Kolhapur - 416230

¶23Sandeep Baban Koli Age-33, OCC-Nil, R/at-Koli Galli, Tilvani, Kolhapur, Dist-Kolhapur, 416116

¶24Kavita Mangesh Shelake Age-35, OCC-Nil, R/at-Ward No. 2 Motala, Buldhana, Dist – Buldhana - 443103

¶25Sandip Samadhan Palave Age-34, OCC-Nil, R/at-Savargaon Jahagir, Buldhana, Dist-Buldhana, 443102

¶26Mohini Nikhil Shaha Age-32, OCC-Nil R/at-Khamgaon, Tal-Khamgaon, Dist-Buldhana, 444303

¶27Jostna Shrimant Chougule Age-35, OCC-Nil R/at-Chabukswarvadi, Dist-Sangli, 416418

¶28Maya Suresh Narute @ Maya Shivaji Bardgan Age-36, OCC-Nil, R/at-Men Road Opp. Vitthal temple, Dhangar Galli, Soni, Sangli, Dist-Sangli,

¶29Priyanka Vishal Sutar Age-33, OCC-Nil R/at-Sutar galli Malegaon, Dist-Sangli, 416407

¶30Vishnu Sopan Raut Age – 38, OCC-NIL, R/at-Urali Kanchan, Tal-haveli, Dist-Pune - 412202

¶31Jyoti Balaso Bitake Age – 34, OCC – Nil, R/at-Yede Wadi Navingar, Pune - 412219

¶32Omkar Suryakant Tamsare Age-40, OCC-Nil R/at-Naigaon, Dist-Nanded, 431707

¶33Archana Shyamrao Bingewar Age-35, OCC-Nil R/at-Cidco kautha, Dist-nanded - 431603

¶34Kranti devidas Gawale Age-26, OCC-Nil R/at-1 15 803 Gandhi Nagar, Po-Taroda BK, Dist-Nanded

¶35Nitin Diliprao Murodiye Age-32, OCC-Nil R/at-Ward, 1, Jamgaon Khurd, Dist-Nagpur,

¶36Sharad Keshav Bhurase Age-33, OCC-Nil, R/at-Keroda, Tal-Saoli Jam Keroda Ryt, Dist-Chandrapur, 441225

¶37Bharati Budhaji Vishe @ Bharati Dattatray Gholap Age-38, OCC-Nil R/at-Waghivali Vishe, Murbad, Kishore, Dist-Thane – 421401

¶38Dipika Kunal Zore @ Dipika Deepak Pendkalkar Age – 31, Occ – Nil, Retibandar Rasta, Dombivali, Kalyan (W), Thane – 421 202.

¶39Savita Gopal Rathod Age-34, Occ-Nil R/at-Ravtale, Chiplun, Dist-Ratnagiti,

¶40Sharvari Nitin Wadekar @ Vinati Vijay Nivalkar Age – 34, Occ – Nil, Lanja, harche, Dist – Ratnagiri – 416 712

¶41Pratap Vinayak Shinde Age-31, OCC-Nil R/at-Ausa, LamJana, Tal-Ausa, Dist-latur, 413516

¶42Avinash Madhukar Wahul Age-34, OCC-Nil, R/at-Plot no-513, Milind Nagar, Osmanpura, Dist-Aurangabad, 431001

¶43Sanjay Madhukar Tribhuwan Age-33, Occ-Nil, R/at-Palkhed, Dist-Aurangabad, 423703

¶44Sagar Vilasrao Bondre Age-30, OCC-Nil, R/at-Sayatkharda, Tal-Ghatanji, Dist-Yavatmal, 445301

¶45Swati Shashikant Maske Age-35, Occ-Nil R/at-Shikshak Banke javal Khandala, Tal-Khandala, Dist – Satara, 412809

¶46Vinod Sakharam Khilare Age-33, Occ-Nil R/at-Gunda, Gund, Dist-Hingoli, 431705

¶47Varsha Yogesh Ahire Age-38, Occ-Nil R/at-Mu Patne, Tal-Malegaon, Dist-Nashik, 423203

¶48Pravin Jagannath Jadhav Age-33, Occ-Nil R/at-11, Rajwada, Pimpalgaon, Dukara, Nashik, Dist-Nashik, 422502.

¶49Varsharani Khashaba Kuchekar Age – 35, Occ – Nil, At/Post – Kuchekarwadi, Palaskhel, Tal – Atpadi, Dist – Sangli – 415 315

¶50Pratibha Shankar Shewale Age-36, Occ – Nil, Nashik, Dist – Nashik – 422 003

¶51Kiran Shivaji Nagare Age – 41, Occ – Nil, Yevala, Dist – Nashik - 423403

¶52Sangharatna Changdev Shinde Age – 33, Occ – Nil, At – Kej, Tal – Kej, Dist – Beed - 431123

¶53Santoshi Satyapal Khedkar Age – 34, Occ – Nil, Sasra, Sakoli, Dist – Bhandara - 441102

¶54Suryakant Rajaram Gaikwad Age – 35, Occ – Nil, Gaikwad Vasti, Pune

¶55Kirankumar Dipak Saskar Age – 36, Occ – Nil, Sangamner, Dist - Ahmadnagar ..PETITIONERS VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra. Through the Secretary of Department of Education & Sports, Mantralaya, Mumbai – 400 001

¶2Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State, Pune. Central Building, Pune – 01.

¶3Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State Exam Council,

¶17Dr. Ambedkar Marg, Near Lal Temple, Pune. ..RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.9939 OF 2024

¶1Yogesh Narayan More Age – 31, Occ. Nil, At – 185K, Agave Morevadi, Tal – Lanja, Dist-Ratnagiri - 415616

¶2Sunil Suresh Gotad Age – 32, Occ. Nil, At – 406, Kiran Bldg, Naren nagar, OP Mangesh Soc Cholegaon, Thakurli, Dombivali - 415619

¶3Krupali Jysing Shinde Age – 29, Occ. Nil, At – Nivali Varchi, Ravanangvadi, Tal – Dist – Ratnagiri - 415639

¶4Dipak Dattaram Revale Age – 34, Occ. Nil, At – 796, Sahanechi Wadi, Sangameshwar, Tal – Sangameshwar - 415611

¶5Rohit Chandrakant Kashalkar Age – 33, Occ. Nil, At – 57 B, Guravwadi, Beni Budruk, Tal – Lanja, Dist - Ratnagiri

¶6Prabhakar Yashwant Dhopat Age – 35, Occ. Nil, At/Post – Watad, Dhopatwadi, Tal-Ratnagiri - 415613

¶7Sugandha Shantaram Ambekdar Age – 35, Occ. Nil, At/Post – Zarewadi, Kalambatewadi, Tal – Dist – Ratnagiri - 415619

¶8Bhalchandra Dilip Durgavale Age – 33, Occ. Nil, At/Post – Vesvi, Tal – Mandangad, Dist-Ratnagiri - 415208

¶9Girdhar Ragho Masule Age – 33, Occ. Nil, Gotane, Post – Chaugaon, Tal – Dhule.

¶10Renuka Chandrakant Mirgule Age – 33, Occ. Nil, At/Post – Watad, Dhopatwadi, Tal-Ratnagiri – 415613.

¶11Shubhada Pramod Ketkar Age – 33, Occ. Nil, At Post Nive BK, Tal – Sangameshwar - 415804

¶12Pranoti Rajendra Rangankar Age – 36, Occ. Nil, 93 B, Rangankarwadi, Ganeshgule, Tal – Dist – Ratnagiri - 415616

¶13Kundana Sadannad Kambale @Samruddhi Liladhar Kud Age – 36, Occ. Nil, At – Dabhil Ambere, Tal. Ratnagiri - 415626

¶14Dinesh Chandrakant Kamble Age – 34, Occ. Nil, At – 117 Bauddhawadu, Post-Choravane, Tal – Sangameshwar - 415803 ..PETITIONERS VERSUS

¶1The State of Maharashtra Through the Secretary of Department of Education & Sports, Mantralaya, Mumbai – 400 001.

¶2Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State, Pune. Central Building, Pune – 01.

¶3Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State Exam Council,

¶17Dr. Ambedkar Marg, Near Lal Temple, Pune. ..RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.10720 OF 2024 1) Arun Balu Jadhav Age – 32, Occ – Nil, R/At – Devape, Tal – Murbad, Dist. - Thane – 421 401 2) Madhuri Arjun Jadhav Age – 37, Occ. Nil, R/at Jadhavwadi, Tal. Phaltan, Dist. Satara – 415 521 3) Abhijeet Hansraj Urade Age – 38, Occ. Nil, R/at Wathar, Phaltan, Dist. Satara – 415 521 4) Nilesh Shantaram Kulaye Age – 38, Occ. Nil, R/at Room No. 3, Rateshwar Chawl, Rawate Compound No. 3, Ramnagar, Bhandup (West), Mumbai – 400 078 5) Tanishk Tejas Lokare Age – 34, Occ. Nil, R/at Tarnadale Road, Gawadewadi, Dist. Sindhudurg – 416 702 6) Arti Appasaheb Patil Age 42, Occ. Nil, R/at Lanja, Tal. Lanja, Dist. Ratnagiri – 416 701 7) Rajesh Chandrakant Patil Age – 34, Occ. Nil, R/at Gorhe, Tal. Wada, Dist. Thane – 421 303 8) Sharda Shatrughna Bhise Age – 34, Occ. Nil, R/at Shahapur, Village Wasind, Dist. Thane – 421 601 9) Mohan Bharat Shelake, Age – 35, Occ. Nil, R/at Mhasa, Tal. Murbad, Dist. Thane – 421 401 10) Sandip Shivaji Barhate Age – 30, Occ. Nil, R/at Shirur, Takali Haji, Dist. Pune – 412 218 11) Radhika Ranjit Phalke Age – 30, Occ. Nil, R/at Waifale, Tal. Tasgaon, Dist. Sangli – 416 312 12) Rajeshwar Gopal Jadhav Age – 33, Occ. Nil, R/at Jeur, Tal. Akkalkot, Dist. Solapur – 413 219 13) Prashant Jalindar Vasamale Age – 34, Occu. Nil, R/at Mahadeo Galli, Wadgaon, Solapur – 413 307 14) Santosh Shrirang Sutar Age – 34, Occ. Nil, R/at Hatid, Solapur, Dist. Solapur – 413 307 15) Swapnil Dattatraya Raut Age – 36, Occ. Nil, R/at Kurduwadi, Tal. Madha, Dist. Solapur – 413 208 16) Ankush Bhimrao Kunse Age - 35, Occ. Nil, R/at Shendola Khurd, Amravati – 444 902 17) Sonali Ramrao Parbat Age – 34, Occ. Nil, R/at Ward No. 2, Babulgaon, Yevatmal, Dist. Yevatmal – 445 101 18) Tatesh Sevakram Pete Age – 36, Occ. Nil, R/at Karatwadi, Railway Post, Tal.Akot, Dist. Akola – 444 101 19) Pooja Bhausaheb Nagre Age – 34, Occ. Nil, R/at Rajapur, Tal. Sangamner, Dist. Ahmednagar – 422 605 20) Sujata Sachin Garudkar Age – 34, Occ. Nil, R/at Tergaon, Karjat Ahmednagar – 414 401 21) Samir Sakharam Kardile Age – 38, Occ. Nil, R/at Purnawadnagar, Tal. Shrirampur, Dist. Ahmednagar – 413 709 22) Sonali Narayan Daware Age – 35, Occ. Nil, R/at Rumbhodi, Tal. Akole, Dist. Ahmednagar – 222 601 23) Sangram Balkrushna Tarhal Age – 32, Occ. Nil, R/at Takalibhan, Tal. Shrirampur, Dist. Ahmednagar – 413 725 24) Santosh Rajmal Telpure, Age – 33, Occ. Nil, R/at Undangaon, Dist. Aurangabad – 431 112 25) Avinash Laxman Maghade Age – 31, Occ. Nil, R/at Samta Nagar, Dist. Aurangabad – 431 109 26) Priyanka Naresh Narawade Age – 35, Occ. Nil, R/at Chalisgaon, Aurangabad, Dist. Aurangabad – 431 105 27) Dnyaneshwar Madan Suroshe Age – 34, Occ. Nil, R/at Nivgha Bazar, Nanded – 431 743 28) Bajrang Raghunathrao Wagawad Age -36, Occ. Nil, R/at Halda, Dist. Nanded – 431 646 29) Murlidhar Vishwanath Shinde Age – 34, Occ. Nil, R/at Shiradhon, Tal. Khandar, Dist. Nanded 431 707 30) Shital Nagorao Dudhambe Age – 29, Occ. Nil, R/at Vithai Nagar, Mudkhed, Nanded – 431 106 31) Anteshwar Sheshrao Kagne Age 34, occ. Nil, R/at Raiwadi, Tal. Loha, Dist. Nanded-431 708 32) Hanumant Tukaram Shirame Age – 35, Occ. Nil, R/at Hadoli, Tal. Loha, Dist. Nanded – 431 714 33) Daregave Shriram Sheshrao, Age – 34, Occ. Nil, R/at Muslim Galli, Hanuman Mandir, Narsee, Tal. Naigaon, Dist. Nanded -431 709 34) Anand Baburao Rathod Age – 33, Occ. Nil, R/at Sanmukh Wadi, Tal. Mukhed, Dist. Nanded – 431 715 35) Laxman Punjaji Satalwadi Age – 36, Occ. Nil, R/at Himayat Nagar, Jalgaon – 431 802 36) Sachin Sahebrao Bhange Age – 32, Occ. Nil R/at New Nanded Vasarni, Nanded – 431 603 37) Dnyaneshwar Madan Suroshe Age – 34, Occ. Nil, R/at Nivgha Bazar, Nanded – 431 743 38) Sandip Vasantrao Jadhav Age-40, Occ.Nil, R/at Subhan Wada, Bahiwadi, Kolhapur Farna Nagar, Kolhapur – 416 113 39) Sushant Siddharth Darabare Age-32, Occ. Nil, R/at Udgaon, Tal. Shirol, Kolhapur – 416 101 40) Varsharani Anandrao Patil Age – 38, Occ. Nil, R/at Malwadi, Tal. Panhala, Dist. Kolhapur – 416 230 41) Sangita Dinkar Choughule Age – 36, Occ. Nil, R/at Karveer, Datta Nagar, Kolapur – 416 010 42) Rahul Arun Palve, Age - 34, Occ. Nil, R/at Samod, Tal. Jamner, Dist. Jalgaon – 424 206 43) Sunil Sardar Vanjari Age – 36, Occ. Nil, R/at Rupnagar, Tal. Bhadgaon, Dist. Jalgaon-424 105 44) Vaishalee Gajanan Navare Age – 33, Occ. Nil, R/at NER, Tal. NER, Dist. Yevatmal – 445 102 45) Nikhil Suresh Borkute Age-33, Occ. Nil, R/at Akpuri, Tal Yavatmal, Dist. Yavatmal – 445 301 46) Prakash Vilas Kongalwar Age – 31, Occ. Nil, R/at Telang Takali, Tal. Kelapur, Dist. Yavatmal – 445 302 47) Shudhodhan Vitthalrao Mhaske Age – 37, Occ. Nil, R/at Masla, Tal. Gangakhed, Dist – Parbhani – 431 514 48) Priyanka Achutrao Jadhav Age – 30, Occ. Nil, R/at Sailu, Tal. Sailloo, Dist. Parbhani – 431 503 49) Minakshi Mahadeo Adhao Age – 34, Occ. Nil, R/at Post Palshi Supo, Tal. Jalgaon, Dist. Buldhana 443403 50) Shivaji Dnyaneshwar Jadhav Age – 36, Occ. Nil, R/at Mera Khurd, Tal. Chiklhli, Dist. Buldhana – 443 201 51) Avinash Dnyaneshwar Suroshe Age – 33, Occ. Nil, R/at Duha, Tal. Buldhana, Dist. Buldhana – 443 106 52) Nilesh Ishwar Halmare Age – 35, Occ. Nil, R/at Bhandara, Dist. Bhandara – 441 904 53) Vilas Keshav Mohutkar Age – 31, Occ. Nil, R/at Umri, Post Mangli, Tal. PAONI, Dist. Bhandara – 441 910 54) Pramod Ramlal Uniwar Age – 33, Occ. Nil, R/at Amgaon, Tal. Desaiganj, Dist. Gadchiroli – 441 207 55) Ganesh Dnyaneshwar Borkar Age – 30, Occ. Nil, R/at Tondgaon, Washim, Dist. Washim – 444 505 56) Sachin Dnyanoba Waghmare Age – 33, Occ. Nil, R/at Khudag, Tal. Sengaon, Dist. Hingoli – 431 542 57) Sharad Ravindra Bodade Age – 40, Occ. Nil, R/at Kamothe, Tal. Panvel, Dist. Raigad – 410 209 58) Prashant Shivaji Gadade Age – 28, Occ. Nil R/at Anjansoda BK, Tal. Chaurk, Dist. Latur 59) Minakshi Shivajirao Shingare Age – 40, Occ. Nil, R/at Partur, Tal. Partur, Dist. Jalna – 431 501 60) Vilas Popat Patil Age-35, Occ. Nil, R/at Nikumbhe, Tal. Dhule, Dist. Dhule – 424 006 61) Nilima Madhukar Sanap Age -31, Occ. Nil, R/at Someshwar Nagar, Barshi Road, Beed, Pin Code 431 122 62) Kalpesh Kashinath Ghawali, Age – 34, Occ – Nil, Room No. 510, Ghavalwadi, Near ST Stand, Dorle, Ratnagiri – 415 6256 ...PETITIONERS VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra Through the Secretary of Department of Education & Sports, Mantralaya, Mumbai – 400 001 2) The Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State, Pune Central Building, Pune - 01 3) Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State Exam Council, 17, Dr. Ambedkar Marg, Near Lal Temple, Pune ...RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.10721 OF 2024 1) Dipak Vasudeo Dingankar Age – 33 Occu – Nil At – Bhatgaon, Tal – Guhagar, Dist – Ratnigiri 2) Nitin Laxman Sahare Age – 36, Occ. Nil, At – Mardi, Near Hanuman Mandir, Tal. Teosa, Dist. Amravati – 444 904 3) Ramdas Pandurang Wagadkar Age – 31, Occu. Nil, At – Plot No. 72, At Post Wakad, Tal. Bhokar, Dist. Nanded – 431 801 4) Rajshree Manikrao Lahane Age – 34 , Occ. Nil, At – Pimpaldari, Tal. Gangakhed, Dist. Parbhani – 431 514 5) Santosh Shivling Hingmire Age – 29, Occ. Nil, At – Kelgaon, Tal. Sillod, Dist. Aurangabad – 431 112 6) Madhuri Anandrao Nale At – Saswad, Tal. Phaltan, Dist. Satara - 415521 7) Sheetal Prashant Bhokare Age – 35, Occ. Nil, At – Bhilwadi, Tal. Palus, Dist. Sangli – 416303 8) Sujata Sitaram Sonwalkar Age – 37 Occ. Nil, At – Songaon, Tal. Baramati, Dist. Pune – 412 102 9) Praveen Shahaji Shendge Age – 29, Occ. Nil, At – Kharatwadi, Post Pimpalegaon, Tal. Shrigonda, Dist. Ahmednagar – 413 703 10) Kavita Prabhakar Khedkar Age – 34, Occ. Nil, At – Nimblak, Tal. Ahmednagar, Dist. Ahmednagar – 414 111 11) Nagesh Sanjay Pophale Age – 33, Occ. Nil, At – Hirdav, Tal. Lonar, Dist. Buldhana – 443 302 12) Rahul Balashaeb Shirsat Age – 33, Occu. Nil, At – Shirsatwadi, Mahadev Mandir, Near Mahadev Mandir, Tal. Pathardi, Dist. Ahmednagar – 414 102 13) Maruti Pandurang Bandgar Age – 34, Occ. Nil, At – Ankdhal Post Chinke, Tal. Sangola, Dist. Solapur – 413 308 14) Rakshanda Dilip Deore Age – 32, Occ. Nil, At – Plot No. 1, Bunglow No. 1, Chandrawel Phase – 2, Nakane Road, Walwadi Shiwar Deopur, Dhule – 424 002 15) Lata Nathu Pardhi Age – 39, Occu. Nil, At – Juni Wasti, Killa Ward, Tirora, Tal. Tirora, Dist. Gondiya – 441 911 16) Priyanka Kailash Narwade Age – 35, Occu. Nil, At – Chitegaon, Tal. Paithan, Dist. Aurangabad – 431 105 17) Neha Shriram Kutafale Age – 33, Occ. Nil, At – Mauli Apt Godbole, Plot Dabki Road, Dist. Akola – 444 002 18) Sanjay Baburao Rathod Age – 37, Occ. Nil, At – Chakucha Tanda, Tal. Gevrai, Dist. Beed – 431 143 19) Dipali Digambar Hawale Age – 33, Occu. Nil, At – Kolher Road, Sanjay Nagar, Georai, Dist. Beed – 431 127 ...PETITIONERS VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra Through the Secretary of Department of Education & Sports, Mantralaya, Mumbai – 400 001 2) The Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State, Pune Central Building, Pune - 01 3) Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State Exam Council, 17, Dr. Ambedkar Marg, Near Lal Temple, Pune ...RESPONDENTS … AND WRIT PETITION NO.8496 OF 2024 1) Syed Azizoddin Syed Gyasoddin Qauzi, Age 33 years, Occ. Nil, R/o. At present Nagar Naka Road, Hyder Baugh, Nanded, Tq.& Dist. Nanded 2) Sabiha Tabassum Ishaque Shah, Age 30 years, Occ. Nil, R/o. At present near Sadad Masjid Azam Colony, Roshan Gate, Ch. Sambhajinagar Tq. & Dist. Sambhajinagar. 3) Munzreen Kausar Abdul Nasir, Age 32 years, occ. Nil. R/o. At present Ghat Road, Behind Chhajed Oil Mil, Chalisgaon, Tq. Chalisgaon, Dist. Jalgaon 4) Mohammad Arifuddin Mohammad Hakimuddin Age 38 years, Occ. Nil, R/o. At present Ghat Road, Behind Chhajed Oil Mill, Chalisgaon, Tq. Chalisgaon, Dist. Jalgaon. 5) Arshiya Naaz Hamzakhan, Age 26 years, Occ. Nil, R/o. At present New Baijipura, Chalisgaon, Tq. Chalisgaon, Dist. Jalgaon ...PETITIONER VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 2) The Commissioner of Education Maharashtra State, Central Building, Pune ...RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.12566 OF 2024 Usha d/o Shankarrao Kendhe Age 45 years, Occ. Education, R/o C/o. Sudam More, Plot No. 13S No. 11, Gurukrupa Colony, Sudhakar Nagar Road, Near Ganga Godavari Lawns, Satara Parisar, Chh. Sambhajinagar-431003 ...PETITIONER VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra Through its Principal Secretary School Education and Sports Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2) The Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State, Pune Having Office at Annibesant Road, District Pune 3) The Chairman Central Board of Secondary Education, Shiksha Kendra-2 Community Centre at Preet Vihar, Delhi 4) National Council of Teachers Education thr. Chairperson, Office at G-7, Dwarka Near Metro Station, New Delhi (Resp. Nos.3 and 4 deleted as per courts order dated

10.12.2024) ...RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO. 10354 OF 2024 Shridhar Vilasrao Sawant, Age 41 years, Occ. Job, R/o. At post Gundge Patan, District Satara ...PETITIONER VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary School Education and Sports Department Mantralaya Mumbai. 2) The Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State, Pune Having Office at Annibesant Road, District Pune. 3) The Pavatra Portal, Working Under the Commissioner (Education) Pune Tq. & Dist. Pune 4) Central Board of Secondary Education New Delhi 5) Maharashtra State Council of Examination Pune, Taluka and District Pune 6) National Council of Teacher Education Through Chairperson, Office At G-7, Dwarka Near Metro Station New Delhi ...RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.13500 OF 2024 1) Santosh Bhikandas Nagargoje, Age 34 years, Occ. Education, R/o. At Wadgaon Gundha Post Adgaon, Tq. & Dist. Beed. 2) Rahulkumar Dnyanoba Yedake, Age 30 years, Occ. Nil, R/o. Ghatnandur Post Ghatpimpri, Tq. Bhoom, Dist. Osmanabad. 3) Vikram Ganesh Lavhate, Age 31 years, Occ. Education, R/o. At post Talegaon Bhokardan, Tq. & Dist. Jalna. 4) Yogesh Bajarang Baravkar, Age 34 years, Occ. Nil, R/o. At post Dongerkinhi, Tq. Patoda, Dist. Beed. …PETITIONERS VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary School Education and Sports Department Mantralaya Mumbai. 2) The Commissioner (Education) Maharashtra State, Pune Having Office at Annibesant Road, District Pune. 3) The Pavatra Portal, Working Under the Commissioner (Education) Pune Tq. & Dist. Pune 4) Central Board of Secondary Education New Delhi 5) Maharashtra State Council of Examination Pune, Taluka and District Pune 6) National Council of Teacher Education Through Chairperson, Office At G-7, Dwarka Near Metro Station New Delhi ...RESPONDENTS … Advocates for the Petitioners in respective matters : Mr. S.S. Thombre, Mr. R.S. Deshmukh Sr. advocate i/b. Mr. V. R. Gargade, Mr. Kuthwad Manoj Ramdas, Mr. M.R. Wagh, Mr. D.R.Shelke, a/w Mr. S.H. Rathod, Mr. Sanjeev Bapu Deore and Mr. A.R. Syed, Advocate for Respondents – State : Mr. Birendra Saraf Advocate General a/w Mr. A.B. Girase Government Pleader, S.K. Tambe, Addl.G.P. and Ms. Neha B. Kamble AGP in all Writ Petitions Advocate for Applicant (Intervenor) in CA/3738/2024: Mr. V.D. Sapkal, Senior Counsel i/b. Mr. S. R. Sapkal Advocate for Respondent No.5 in WP/7128/2024 : Mr. Swapnil Joshi a/w Mr. Chetan Chaudhari and Mr. Mahendra Swami i/b M/s. J.P. Legal Associates Advocate for Respondents : Mr. S.S. Deve and Mr. Sachin V. Kuptekar for National Council of Teachers Education in respective matters Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A.R. Nikam for Maharashtra State Exam Council in respective Writ Petitions ...

CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL &

PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ. Reserved on : 14.12.2024 Pronounced on : 14.02.2025 JUDGMENT (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) : Considering commonalty of the issues raised in all these petitions from different benches of the High Court, those have been clubbed together, heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

¶2Rule. It is made returnable forthwith. Learned Advocate General Mr. Birendra Saraf, and the learned advocates for the respective respondents waive service. Considering the urgency and the ramification since challenges are put up to the entire merit list prepared by the Board of Examination of the State of Maharashtra, the matters are heard finally at the stage of admission.

¶3At the outset, it would be apt to cull down the common issue to be addressed in all these petitions : Whether candidates from the reserved category who have availed the concession to become eligible to participate in the examination to select the candidates for a post, can migrate to an open/unreserved category on the basis of their scores in the selection examination.

¶4All these petitions put up a challenge to the merit list published on 25.02.2024 for recommending the candidate to individual establishments for recruitment of teachers through an online portal viz. Pavitra Portal, evolved in the light of directions of this Court of undertaking the process.

¶5In order to appreciate the issue in the proper perspective, it would be apposite to peep into the history. In the light of the provision of Section 23 of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (RTE Act), the qualification for appointment and terms and conditions of the service of the teachers, are expected to be provided for ensuring quality of education imparted to children. The Central Government established National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) on 23.08.2010 as an apex body to lay down the qualification for appointment of teachers. The NCTE laid down the qualification for a person to be appointed as a teacher to teach Class I to VIII on

23.08.2010. It prescribed clearance of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) as an essential qualification for appointment of teachers. By issuing notification on 11.02.2011 it also laid down methodology of the TET examination. It was stated that the qualifying marks would be 60% or more at the TET examination. It also enabled the Governments, local bodies and government aided and unaided institutions to relax this passing percentage for reserved category students under the extant reservation policy. The NCTE itself by notification dated 29.07.2011 provided the relaxation up to 5% in the qualifying marks for the reserved category candidates.

¶6The State of Maharashtra by Government Resolution dated

13.02.2013 and pursuant to the provision of Section 23 of the RTE Act and the aforementioned NCTE guidelines made TET as a mandatory qualification for teachers in the State. By another Government Resolution dated 06.03.2013 it was directed that the TET qualification should be acquired by 31.03.2015, which was subsequently by GR dated

20.08.2013, deleted.

¶7Government Resolution dated 23.08.2013 enabled a candidate to appear for the TET any number of time to improve his score.

¶8In accordance with the NCTE guidelines, the Government of Maharashtra come out with resolution dated 07.02.2019 and granted concession of up to 55% in the qualifying marks in respect of reserved category candidates. Pursuant to the directions of this Court in PIL No.8/2015 the Government of Maharashtra passed Government Resolution on 23.06.2017 and made a provision of Pavitra Portal which was visible to all the candidates participating in the recruitment process of teachers. It also mandated Teachers Aptitude and Intelligence Test

(TAIT) as the competitive examination further providing that the marks obtained in that test as a parameter for preparation of the merit list. It was also provided therein that the candidate will have five chances to improve their score at the TAIT.

¶9The State Government issued GR on 07.02.2019 and sought to undertake and operate the Pavitra Portal expressly declaring that recruitment to the post of Shikshan Sevak would be conducted on the basis of the scores in TAIT. Private Educational Institutes were given option to follow the selection on the basis of merit in the TAIT plus the performance at the interview. Though initially it enabled a candidate to give five attempts at the TAIT examination, the relevant clause 3.4 from this GR was modified by GR dated 10.11.2022 making it mandatory for a candidate to appear at a fresh TAIT every time and declaring that the previous score at TAIT would not be considered.

¶10In the light of such NCTE guidelines and various Government Resolutions the respondent – Maharashtra State Council of Examination, Pune (MSCE) conducted TAIT examination for selection of teachers in different schools of Zilla Parishad, Municipal Corporation, Nagar Parishad and private managements, in the year 2023. A merit list was displayed on 25.02.2024 and on the next date i.e. 26.02.2024 it was displayed on the portal that the candidates who had taken benefit of reservation in respect of their scores at the TET or CTET will not be considered for unreserved category. All these petitions take exception to this merit list published on 25.02.2024 and some of them seek its correction and in some petitions even the subsequent notification put up on 26.02.2024 on the website is challenged.

¶11The thrust of the submissions of all the learned advocates of the petitioners is to the effect that the score at the TET or CTET merely provides eligibility and the ultimate selection was declared to be purely on the basis of the scores of the candidates at TAIT. Their stand is that any concession extended to reserved candidates just to make them eligible cannot deprive them of migrating to unreserved category on the basis of their merit at the selection examination TAIT. Once it is declared that the selection of the candidates was to be purely on the basis of their scores at TAIT, ignoring their merit in TAIT would be contrary to the aim and object of Section 23 of the RTE Act, of maintaining standard of education. If the selection criteria was only to be the scores at TAIT, it would be illogical and illegal if meritorious candidates at TAIT who, in spite of merit are denied such migration merely because of having deservedly received some concession in the eligibility criteria. In order to substantiate their such submission they would rely upon the decisions in the matter of Vikas Sankhala and Ors. Vs. Vikas Kumar Agarwal and Ors.; AIR 2016 SC 5265, Saurav Yadav and Ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.; 2021 AIR (SC) 233, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Sandeep Choudhary and Ors.; AIR 2022 SC 2975, Sadhana Singh Dangi and Ors. Vs. Pinki Asati and Ors.; (2022) 2 SCC 401.

¶12They would also rely upon couple of decisions of this Court in the matter of Charushila Tukaram Chaudhari and Ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr.; 2019 (5) AIR Bom R 561 and Sayali Nitin Inamke Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.; 2023 DGLS (Bom.) 3581.

¶13The other limb of the submission of the learned advocates for the petitioners is based on the usual stand in such matters of changing the rules of the game after it was played. They submitted that at no point of time the candidates were notified that such of the reserved candidates who would obtain some concession at the TET or CTET would not be permitted to migrate to the unreserved category. However, the impugned communication, by way of notification on the website on 26.02.2024, after publication of the merit list was received by them as a bolt from the blue. Had there been any such notification at the earlier point of time the reserved category candidates could have participated at the TAIT without claiming any reservation. They, therefore, submitted that such subsequent change in the stance by way of notification, after publication of the merit list is an after thought and is an attempt to salvage some ground and justify the wrong.

¶14The learned advocates of the petitioners would also cite certain instances, wherein, some candidates having scored less at the TAIT, either from the reserved category or unreserved category, find place in the merit lists in the unreserved category, and some candidates claiming reservation in spite of having scored more at the TET are missing in the TAIT merit list and could have easily be placed in the unreserved category on the basis of their score at the TAIT.

¶15The learned advocates for the petitioners would submit that the whole exercise of preparing such a merit list is contrary to the reservation policy and the trite principles of law, and prevents reserved category candidates to be placed in the unreserved category purely on the basis of their merit in the selection examination.

¶16Per contra, the learned Advocate General would, at the outset taken a stand that the issue being raised by the petitioners is no longer res integra in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in the matter of Govt. of NCT Delhi and Ors. Vs. Pradeep Kumar and Ors.; AIR Online 2019 SC 2024. He would advert our attention to paragraph Nos.23 to 27. He would submit that since it is a matter of quality of education to be maintained, the performance at the TET or CTET is also equally important. It was prescribed that the 60% score at the TET was the benchmark to maintain this quality. Every candidate was given any number of opportunities to better the score precisely for this reason. The reserved category candidates who were otherwise not eligible could become eligible for appearing at the TAIT by receiving 5% of concession in the marks at the TET or CTET. It is only because of such concession that they were eligible to appear at the TAIT. He would submit that precisely for this reason, Pradeep Kumar (supra) expressly laid down that a reserve category candidate having obtained concession in respect of score at the qualifying examination of CTET, irrespective of their merit in the TAIT, cannot seek to migrate to the unreserved category. He would therefore submit that Pradeep Kumar (supra) lays down the settled position of law and in itself is sufficient to negate petitioners' claims.

¶17The learned Advocate General would also quote before us certain instances qua specific candidates. He would demonstrates that though the score of a reserved category candidate at the TAIT is more than a general category candidate or even a reserved category candidate from the merit list from unreserved category, had scored more than him at the TET/CTET. He would, therefore, submits that merely by pointing out that an unreserved category candidate scoring less than the reserved category candidate at TAIT finding place in the merit list would be misleading unless even the respective scores at the TET/CTET are considered. He would submit that in any case this principle has been applied uniformly and cannot be taken exception of.

¶18The learned Advocate General would further submit that the Pavitra Portal is a complex matter. The scores at TET, CTET and TAIT are not the only relevant considerations. It is merely a platform so that the candidates can see the vacancies and opt for particular institutions and the posts. It is a common portal for all the educational institutions across the State irrespective of whether it is a Zilla Parishad run school or school being run by local bodies but even the private institutions, aided or unaided. The lists are prepared on the basis of the options exercised by the candidates and availability of the posts according to the merit. Therefore, merely by pointing out the individual merit without the other relevant considerations would not be sufficient to establish discrimination or arbitrariness in preparation of the merit list.

¶19As regards the stand of the petitioners about the notification having been put up on the portal after preparation of the merit list, the learned Advocate General would submit that the stand is fallacious. He would submit that the office memorandum was issued by the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, of the Department of Personnel and Training, Government of India dated 01.07.1998 and

04.04.2018. It was expressly notified that migration of a reserved category candidate to unreserved category would not be available to the candidates of the reserved category who had secured relaxation in respect of age, experience etc. He would submit that the notification dated 26.02.2024 put up on the website was nothing but a reiteration of the extant policy which is being followed consistently. He would submit that it is not a matter of justifying the merit list ex post facto.

¶20Lastly, the learned Advocate General would submit that the decisions cited on behalf of the petitioners are peculiar to the individual cases and do not address the exact issue in the factual scenario, particularly in the light of Pradeep Kumar (supra).

¶21The rival submissions now fall for our consideration. As can be appreciated, the fate of these matters and the challenge put up to the merit list hinges on the issue which we have formulated herein above.

¶22Whether the TET – CTET merely provides for eligibility of a candidate or whether it is something more than that, touching the quality of education to be imparted is the basic issue common to all these petitions. In our considered view, with respect, the issue has been squarely covered by Pradeep Kumar (supra) and no different view is possible. The observations in Pradeep Kumar (supra) from paragraphs No.23 to 27 are relevant and read as under : "23. The other distinguishing aspect in Vikas Sankhala (supra) is that the candidates who had applied under the reserved category belonged to Rajasthan. For the selection and aspirants from the same State i.e., Rajasthan, the Court allowed such candidates to migrate to the unreserved category. In the present case, however, the candidates (i.e. the respondents) belong to States other than Delhi. Being OBC (outsiders), they could have been considered only under the unreserved category if they secure at least 60% marks in the CTET. The respondents admittedly did not secure 60% and thus were ineligible. Moreover, an OBC candidate not certified in the State/Territory outside of Delhi cannot be eligible to avail of employment in reserved category posts earmarked for OBCs who are certified by the Delhi Government.

¶24It is important to keep in mind that the respondents are competing for general category vacancies. All others in this group have obtained their CTET eligibility qualification, securing the normal pass marks without availing any relaxation of pass norms. On the other hand, the respondents despite their lesser marks in the CTET examination, could qualify only because they availed the relaxation benefits as OBC category examinees. Their eligibility qualification is secured under relaxed norms meant for OBC category and therefore we do not think it is proper to consider them to be eligible for the general category vacancies and contention to the contrary is unacceptable.

¶25The respondents with their CTET qualification under relaxed norms would be eligible for OBC category posts provided their OBC status is certified and recognized by the Delhi government. But such not being the case, they are ineligible for the reserved category vacancies. To allow them to migrate and compete for the open category vacancies would not be permissible simply because, they have secured the CTET qualification with relaxation of pass marks meant for those belonging to the OBC category. As the respondents have not secured the normal pass marks for general category, their eligibility for the general category vacancies is not secured. Therefore, their performance in the selection examination would be of no relevance, in the present process.

¶26As earlier discussed, this case concerns qualifications obtained with concession in pass marks. Such concession would have a direct impact on standards of competence and merit in the recruitment of Special Education Teachers. The principles of reservation under the Constitution of India are intended to be confined to a specifically earmarked category and the unreserved category must be protected, to avoid dilution of competence and merit. If Vikas Sankhala (supra) is interpreted shorn of its peculiar facts, as has been suggested by the respondents' counsel, it would in our perception, considering that respondents secured the qualification under relaxed norms, would lead to dilution of merit in the unreserved category. The arguments made to the contrary by the respondents is therefore rejected.

¶27In view of the forgoing, the High Court and the Tribunal erred in granting relief to the respondents. The impugned judgment of the High Court of Delhi in Writ Petition (C) No. 557 of 2019 dated 21.1.2019 is set aside and this appeal is allowed. No order as to costs." As can be noticed, the decision in the matter of Vikas Sankhala (supra) has also been incidentally distinguished by Pradeep Kumar (supra). The observations in paragraph No.26 even address the impact on the standards of competence and merit in respect of recruitment of the teachers. It has been held that relaxation in qualification would lead to dilution of the standards of education.

¶23True it is, as laid down in catena of decisions that while undertaking preparation of any list in respect of a recruitment processes providing for vertical reservation under Article 16(4) of the Constitution of India or horizontal one, under Articles 15(3) and 16(1), invariably 50% of the seats are to be allotted purely on merit at the qualifying examination irrespective the categories to which the candidates belong. It is thereafter that the respective reservations of different classes have to be worked out. This is being consistently followed in the light of the celebrated judgment in the matter of Indira Sawhney Vs. Union of India and Ors.; 2000 (1) SCC 168.

¶24Saurav Yadav (supra), followed thereafter in many matters including Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (supra), which in turn also refers to Sadhana Singh Dangi (supra), reiterated this principle. In our considered view, the submission of the learned advocates for the petitioners referring to the decisions in the matter of Saurav Yadav, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Sadhana Singh Dangi (supra), and even referring to the decisions of the division benches of this Court in the matter of Charushila Tukaram Chaudhari and Sayali Nitin Inamke (supra), is not relevant for the determination of the issue before this Court in these matters which is as to if having become eligible by deriving the benefit of reservation and having scored less than 60% which is the benchmark provided for passing the TET/CTET, the candidates of the reserved category can be allowed to migrate to the unreserved category solely on the basis of their merit at the selection examination - TAIT. This is the precise issue considered and decided in the matter of Pradeep Kumar (supra), in the process distinguishing the other judgment relied upon by the petitioners, in the matter of Vikas Sankhala (supra).

¶25The dispute in Saurav Yadav (supra) was regarding adjustment of vertical reservation vis a vis horizontal reservation for women. This is not the issue before us.

¶26Once having understood the peculiarity of the matters in hand in the light of Pradeep Kumar (supra), the performance at the TET/CTET also being a relevant consideration in light of Section 23 of the RTE Act, going to the root of quality and standard of the education to be imparted and is not merely a screening or preliminary examination, the decisions in the matter of K. Manjusree Vs. State of A.P. and Ors.; AIR 2008 SC 1470, Jitendra Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs. State of U.P. and Ors.; 2010 (3) SCC 119, Ramnaresh @ Rinku Kushwah and Ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors.; 2024 DGLS (SC) 759, Deependra Yadav and Ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors.; AIR 2024 SC 2147, would not be applicable to the fact situation of the matters in hand. In all these matters the issue was regarding the performance at the qualifying examination, wherein following the consistent line in the light of Indira Sawhney (supra), the reserved category candidates were allowed to migrate to the unreserved category purely based on their merits at the qualifying examination. Precisely for this reason even the decisions in respect of relaxations obtained by a reserved category candidate in respect of fees and age limit being not considered as operating against the claim of the reserved category candidates for migration to the unreserved category, would not be applicable to the matters in hand.

¶27As regards the stand of the petitioners that they were not made known that they would not be entitled to migration and it is only after publication of the merit list that the notification in question dated

26.02.2024 was uploaded, as has been rightly submitted by the learned Advocate General, this was the extant policy as per the D.O.P.T. memoranda dated 01.07.1998 and 04.04.2018. Again, no such prior intimation in the form of a condition in the advertisement or notification would be necessary inasmuch as this is the law of the land which has been declared by the Supreme Court. Since it is a matter of following policy of reservation, as has been rightly put by the learned Advocate General, notification dated 26.02.2024 is nothing but reiteration of the policy. It is not a case of changing the rules of the game. Having derived concession to reach the benchmark, for appearing at TAIT, the petitioners can be said to have knowledge about the consequences. Even without such notification dated 26.02.2024, the same principle would apply, preventing them from migrating to the unreserved category. Therefore, even this submission of the learned advocates for the petitioners is not legally tenable.

¶28Their can be no debate as regards importance of TET/CTET, qua the standard of the education to be maintained, as interpreted and laid down in Pradeep Kumar (supra). The challenge to the merit list which prevents the candidates who have become eligible to appear at the TAIT in spite of having scored less than the benchmark of 60% at the TET/CTET, to migrate to the unreserved category, is not legally sustainable. Writ Petition No.8610/2024

¶29Additionally the challenge in this petition is to the merit list as being unconstitutional and contrary to the policy of reservation. The submission of the learned advocate Mr. Rathod for the petitioners is fallacious. It needs to be emphasized that reserved category candidates who have secured the benchmark of 60% at the TET/CTET and are eligible to appear at the TAIT can easily migrate to the unreserved category in light of the trite principle reiterated by the Supreme Court time and again as discussed herein above. Since it is a matter of quality and standard of education to be imparted by the teachers teaching to standard I to VIII, they cannot be made to face the challenge by the reserved category candidates who were not eligible but for relaxation of up to 5% of marks at the basic TET/CTET examination.

¶30The affidavit-in-reply filed in Mr. Rathod's matter, detail statistics has been provided to demonstrate that following the policy of reservation, many reserved category candidates could easily migrate to the unreserved category having not received any concession in their score at TET. It is pointed out that 2410 candidates belonging to reserved category who had not availed concession in marks form 68.85% of the list of 3500 candidates. It is also pointed out that over all percentage of reserved category candidates is 90.17% (9995) in respect of total 11085 posts under the merit list published on 25.02.2024. It has also been pointed out that in the lists published on 25.06.2024 and 11.07.2024,

69.12% (828) and 88.81% (2936) candidates respectively, could easily migrate having not availed any concession in respect of the score at TET. It cannot be said, therefore, that the norm applied for preventing migration of reserved candidates who were otherwise not even eligible to appear at the TAIT from migrating to unreserved category based solely on their merit at the TAIT, is not discriminatory or unconstitutional. WP No.7922/2024 and WP No.4827/2024

¶31In these two writ petitions, apart from the issue involved in the other writ petitions one additional issue has been raised. All these petitioners claim to have completed their education through Urdu medium. They are, therefore, aspiring to be appointed as assistant teachers in Urdu medium schools. Their stand is that due to non-availability of candidates from Urdu medium, about 1150 vacancies remained in spite of the recruitment process having been undertaken. Though they have become eligible to appear at TAIT, having derived concession of 5% marks in the scoring at the TET/CTET, now that they have cleared TAIT and have reasonably fared well, it would be appropriate if they can be considered for filling these number of vacant seats. They are aggrieved that their such reasonable request is also not being considered by the respondent No.2 – Commissioner.

¶32In our considered view, if at all, all these petitioners having become eligible to appear at TAIT by getting the concession to reach the benchmark for becoming eligible to appear at TAIT, merely because they have some additional advantage having themselves completed education through Urdu medium and could be of some aid to the Urdu medium schools in imparting education and merely because there are seats going vacant, they cannot be permitted to migrate to the general category, the common thread being prohibition to such migration to unreserved category once having derived the benefit of concession, to be eligible to appear at the qualifying examination – TAIT.

¶33It would be a matter of policy for the State Government to explore as to how to come out of the situation when these number of posts are going vacant in respect of teachers to be appointed in Urdu medium schools. This Court in exercise of the powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India would be loath in taking some view in the policy matters. Consequently, even both these petitions are liable to be dismissed.

¶34For the aforementioned reasons all the writ petitions are dismissed.

¶34All pending civil applications are disposed of.

¶35Rule is discharged. [ PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR] [ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE JUDGE habeeb

Source: High Court of Bombay, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.