- Court
- High Court of Punjab and Haryana
- Decided
- 2 May 2024
- Bench
- Aman Chaudhary
- Case no.
- CWP 8931/2021
Judgment
other connected cases 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 233+249
CWP-3398-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.05.2024 1) Gaganpreet Singh
2) CWP-8931-2021 (O&M) Shinder Pal Kaur
3) CWP-11548-2015 (O&M) Paramjit Kaur
4) CWP-17053-2015 (O&M) Palwinder Kaur
5) CWP-184-2017 (O&M) other connected cases 2 6) CWP-1260-2020 (O&M) Harpreet Singh 7) CWP-12688-2016 (O&M) Sukhpreet Singh 8) CWP-12689-2016 (O&M) Gursewak Singh 9) CWP-14040-2016 (O&M) Jaswant Singh
10) CWP-13171-2018 (O&M) other connected cases 3
11) CWP-14061-2018 (O&M) Kulwinder Kaur
12) CWP-14971-2020 (O&M) Baljeet Kaur
13) CWP-22260-2019 (O&M) Pardeep Singh
14) CWP-2501-2017 (O&M) Gurjeet Singh
15) CWP-25166-2021 (O&M) Rashvi Lata
other connected cases 4 16) CWP-3243-2017 (O&M) Jeevan Singh
17) CWP-5531-2017 (O&M) Jaspreet Singh
18) CWP-6805-2017 (O&M) Simerjeet Singh
19) CWP-6822-2017 (O&M) Baljit Singh
20) CWP-7580-2017 (O&M) Sunil Rani
other connected cases 5 21) CWP-8173-2017 (O&M) Ranveer Singh
22) CWP-5705-2019 (O&M) Dilpreet Kaur
23) CWP-6367-2020 (O&M) Nanak Singh and others ...Petitioners
24) CWP-6372-2020 (O&M) Karamjit Singh
25) CWP-21028-2020 (O&M) Karnail Singh
26) CWP-23109-2016 (O&M) Manjot Kaur
other connected cases 6 27) CWP-23696-2018 (O&M) Jasvir Kaur
28) CWP-24852-2022 (O&M) Baby
29) CWP-24897-2021 (O&M) Manpreet Singh
30) CWP-25637-2017 (O&M) Nachhattar Kaur and others ...Petitioners
31) CWP-298-2020 (O&M) Harpal Singh
32) CWP-3499-2020 (O&M) Lakhwinder Singh and another ...Petitioners other connected cases 7
33) CWP-8872-2021 (O&M) Manvinder Singh and another ...Petitioners
34) CWP-3300-2021 (O&M) Mewa Singh and others ...Petitioners
35) CWP-5397-2020 (O&M) Sukhmander Singh and another ...Petitioners
36) CWP-6225-2021 (O&M) Gurdeep Singh
37) CWP-9833-2017 (O&M) Beant Singh
38) CWP-18745-2019 (O&M) other connected cases 8
39) CWP-22291-2021 (O&M) Pardeep Singh
40) CWP-3233-2020 (O&M) Satpal Singh
41) CWP-6403-2022 (O&M) Pinky Sharma
42) CWP-5395-2020 (O&M) Pargat Singh and another ...Petitioners
43) CWP-6518-2017 (O&M) Sandeep Kaur
44) CWP-7213-2022 (O&M) other connected cases 9
45) CWP-1604-2024 (O&M) Sumanpreet Kaur
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY **** Present: Mr. Arun Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners in CWP-3398-2018, CWP-9833, 6518 and 6805 of 2017, CWP-18745-2019, CWP-3233-2020, CWP-22291-2021 and CWP-24852, 6403, 7213 of 2022. Mr. J.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nitesh Singla, Advocate for the petitioner in CWP-1604-2024. Mr. A.K. Walia, Advocate for the petitioners in CWP-25637-2017. Mr. Gagneshwar Walia, Addl. A.G., Punjab. ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY J. (Oral)
¶1These cases involve similar issues and therefore, are being disposed of together by this common judgment.
¶2The prayer in the present petitions is for quashing the order dated
28.07.2014, Annexure P-3 and Clause 3 & 4 of guidelines dated 03.03.2014 as also the criteria for determining cases of exceptional hardship and further directing the respondents to appoint the petitioners on Government job.
¶3Learned counsel would submit that the petitioners were entitled for appointment in terms of the policy dated 08.11.2011, Annexure P-1 on account of the acquisition of their land having taken place for establishing other connected cases 10 Peona Power Plant at village Gobindpura. There are different grounds on which their claims have been rejected by the Deputy Commissioner, which form basis of challenge in these cases but the judgments in their favour that deal with the issues of cutoff date, hardship clause etc., are required to be taken into consideration, for which they pray the higher officer be directed to have a relook in the matter in a time bound manner.
¶4Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that a High Level Committee consisting of Commissioner Division, Faridkot, District Attorney, Legal, Mansa, District Revenue Officer, Mansa, Sub-divisional Magistrate, Budhlada will be constituted with a representative of the department concerned as well, to look into these aspects.
¶5The aforesaid satisfied the learned counsel for the petitioners.
¶6In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petitions stand disposed of for the Committee to be formed to examine the claims of the petitioners afresh within a period of six months, by taking into consideration the pleas and judgments, which the petitioners may raise and cite during course of personal hearing be afforded to them, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, if found entitled, grant them the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioners shall be free to seek legal redress.
¶7A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected cases.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY)
JUDGE
02.05.2024 Hemant : :
Source: High Court of Punjab and Haryana, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.