- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 14 October 2024
- Bench
- Budi Habung
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 42/2024
Judgment
O R D E R
15.10.2024 Heard Mr. Taka Kichu, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. Imtiwapang, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the claimant/respondent nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4. Mr. Taka Kichu, learned counsel for the applicant has taken steps upon respondent nos. 5 and 6 by way of newspaper publication however, no one appears on behalf of respondent nos. 5 and 6. In view of the above, the notice upon the respondent nos. 5 and 6 is deemed to be complete. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 praying for condonation of delay of 329 (three hundred twenty-nine) days in filing the connected appeal against the impugned Judgment and Order dated 24.01.2023 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tuensang, Nagaland in MAC Case no. 3/2021. Page No.# 3/3 The grounds for delay in filing the connected appeal has been explained in paragraphs 7, 8, 9 and 10 of the condonation petition. Upon hearing and on consideration of the grounds mentioned in the said paragraphs, this Court is satisfied that the applicant has been able to show sufficient cause for not preferring the connected appeal within the stipulated time. Moreover, the respondent/claimant has also no objection if the delay is condoned. In view of the above, the delay of 329 (three hundred twenty-nine) days in filing the connected appeal is hereby condoned. With the above, this I.A. stand disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC020001582024 2024:GAU-NL:537 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH) KOHIMAoBENCH CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/42/2024ooooooooo THEoBRANCHoMANAGER,oCHOLAMANDALAMoMSoGENERALo INSURANCEoCO.oLTDo ASTHAoPLAZAoCOMPLEXo 7THoFLOOR,oOPPOSITEoS.D.oDEORAHoCOLLEGE,oBORAoSERVICE,o ULUBARI,oGUWAHATI-781007,oASSAM VERSUSo SHRIoRUPJYOTIoLEKHARUoANDo5oORSo S/OoLT.oBISHEWARoLEKHARUo R/OoTUENSANGoTOWN,oNAGALAND 2:SHRIoPRABINoLEKHARU oS/OoLT.oBISHEWARoLEKHARUo R/OoTUENSANGoTOWN 3:SHRIoSABINoLEKHARU oS/OoLToBISHEWARoLEKHARUo R/OoTUENSANGoTOWN 4:SMTI.oRINAoLEKHARU oWIFEoOFoLT.oBISHEWARoLEKHARUo R/OoTUENSANGoTOWN 5:MSoSANTIoHORO oC/OoLT.oLUKAoHOROo VILLAGEoBHARALUWAo P.O.oDOLOHATo P.S.oNORTHoLAKHIMPURo DIST-oLAKHIMPURoASSAM 6:SHRIoDIPANKARoHAZARIKA oS/OoSHRIoTILESWARoHAZARIKAo Page No.# 2/3 R/O LOTHOW PATHAR P.O. NOWBOICHA P.S. NORTH LAKHIMPUR LAKHIMPUR ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : LICHANI MURRY, Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.