- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 24 September 2024
- Bench
- Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 2949/2024
Judgment
ORDER
25.09.2024 Heard Mr M Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners, 1) Muhammad Sarwar and 2) Mohamed Zakria @ Md Zakaria, who have filed this application under Section 483 of Page No.# 2/3 the BNSS, 2023, with prayer for bail as they are behind bars since 06.09.2024 and
13.09.2024, respectively, in connection with Bongaigaon PS Case No. 308/2024, registered under Sections 61(2)(a)/319(2)/ 318(4)/308(2)/351(3) of the BNS, 2023.
¶2Also heard Mr M P Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
¶3It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are working under a licensed money lender, i.e., Rahimuddin Khan. It is submitted that a false case has been brought up against the petitioners that they have been extorting innocent citizens in lieu of money lent to them. The petitioners have prayed for bail on these grounds.
¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has raised serious objection stating that there are incriminating materials in the Case Diary against the present petitioners.
¶5I have scrutinized the Case Diary.
¶6It is true that investigation is still at its nascent stage, but it appears that bail may be granted to the petitioners.
¶7It appears that investigation may not be adversely affected if the petitioners are granted bail on certain conditions.
¶9Considering all aspects, petition is allowed. Both the petitioners are enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 30,000/-each, with one suitable surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Bongaigaon, under the conditions Page No.# 3/3 that-
i) the petitioners shall refrain from such activities with which they are alleged,
ii) the petitioners shall appear before the IO on every fortnight and cooperate with the investigation, till completion of investigation,
iii) the petitioners shall not exercise threats to the witnesses and the victims and try to influence them, and
iv) the petitioners shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Court, without prior permission.
9.1. On breach of any of the bail conditions, this bail order shall automatically stand cancelled.
¶10Bail Application stands disposed of.
¶11Send back the Case Diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010202132024 2024:GAU-AS:9621 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2949/2024 MUHAMMAD SARWAR AND ANR S/O LATE JANGUL, R/O CHAPAGURI ROAD, WARD NO. 8, P.S.- BONGAIGAON, DIST- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM 2: MOHAMED ZAKRIA @ MD ZAKARIA S/O ABDUL KARIM R/O WARD NO. 10 CHAPAGURI ROAD NORTH BONGAIGAON P.S. AND DIST- BONGAIGAON ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M KHAN, MS J AKTAR,MR A K DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.