- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 17 December 2024
- Bench
- Vijay Bishnoi, Kaushik Goswami
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 3132/2024
Judgment
PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010181452024 ooooooo 2024:GAU-AS:12866-DB ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/3132/2024ooooooooo 1:oKAMESWARoBORUAHoANDo20oORSo S/OoLATEoTIPSONoBORUAH,oR/OoCHAPAKHOWA,o P.O.-CHAPAKHOWA,oP.S.-SADIYA,oPIN-786157,oDIST-TINSUKIA,oASSAM 2:oJYOTISHoGOGOI S/OoLATEoMOHENoCHANDRAoGOGOIoR/OoCHAULKHOWAoNA-GAON P.O.oANDoP.S.-SADIYAoPIN-786155oDIST-TINSUKIAoASSAM 3:oRUDRAoPAYENG S/OoLATEoPREMADHARoPAYENGoR/OoMINGMANGo(KHERONIBARI) P.O.-AMARPURoP.S.-SADIYAoPIN-786157oDIST-TINSUKIAoASSAM 4:oSMT.oHEWALIoDEORI D/OoSABINATAHoDEORIooR/OoSUNPURAoDEORIGAONoP.O.-NATUNoBALIJANo P.S.-CHANGoCHAPoCHARIALIoPIN-786158oDIST-TINSUKIAoASSAM 5:oSMT.oKALPANAoDEORI D/OoHARENDRAoNATHoDEORIoR/OoSUNPURAoDEORIGAONoP.O.-NATUNo BALIJANoP.S.-CHANGoCHAPoCHARIALIoPIN-786158oDIST-TINSUKIAoASSAM 6:oSMT.oRUPOHIoBORGOHAIN D/OoSRIoSHANGABARoBORGOHAINoR/OoCHAPAKHOWA P.O.-CHAPAKHOWAoP.S.-SADIYAoPIN-786157oDIST-TINSUKIAoASSAM 7:oSMT.oNIRUPAMAoDEORI D/OoLATEoCHATRADHARoDEORIoR/OoCHAPAKHOWAoMEDICALoCHARIALI P.O.-CHAPAKHOWAoP.S.-SADIYAoPIN-786157oDIST-TINSUKIAoASSAM 8:oHEMoCHANDRAoKONWAR S/OoDANBORUDHARoKONWARoR/Oo2oNO.oCHAPAKHOWAoGAON P.O.-CHAPAKHOWAoP.S.-SADIYAoPIN-786157oDIST-TINSUKIAoASSAM 9:oANILoGOGOI S/OoLATEoANANDAoGOGOIoR/OoTELIKOLAoGAON PageoNo.#o2/5 P.O.-KUNDILoP.S.-NA-SADIYAoPIN-786158oDIST-TINSUKIAoASSAM 10:oSMT.oPUTULIoKURMI D/OoLATEoHARADHAoKURMIoR/OoKHORIKOTIAoGAONoP.O.-KUKUREAo KHOWAoP.S.-PANITULAoPIN-786183oDIST-TINSUKIAoASSAM 11:oMRS.oSUNANDAoBURAGOHAIN D/OoLATEoKATIYAoBURAGOHAINoR/OoPUBoLACHIToNAGAR P.O.-CHAPAKHOWAoP.S.-CHAPAKHOWAoPIN-786157oDIST-TINSUKIAoASSAM 12:oSMT.oBISWAMIKAoGOGOI D/OoLAKHESWARoGOGOIoR/OoLAKHIMIoPATHERoP.O.-CHAPAKHOWA SADIYAoP.S.-SADIYAoPIN-786157oDIST-TINSUKIAoASSAM 13:oTROILUKYAoBARUAH S/OoLATEoTIYARAMoBARUAHoR/OoBISHNUPURoPOHUKHOWAGAON P.O.-SADIYAo(GHUMTIBIL)oP.S.-SADIYAoPIN-786155oDIST-TINSUKIAoASSAM 14:oKESHABoBARUAH S/OoLATEoGUMANoBARUAHoR/OoKUKURAMARAoP.O.-KUKURAMARAo (SADIYA)oP.S.-NA-SADIYAoPIN-786158oDIST-TINSUKIAoASSAM 15:oMISSoPARINITAoGOGOI D/OoLATEoBIKANoCH.oGOGOIoR/OoJYOTISHoNAGARoP.O.-CHAPAKHOWA P.S.-SADIYAo(CHAPAKHOWA)oPIN-786157oDIST-TINSUKIAoASSAM 16:oLOHIToKUMARoDEORI S/OoLATEoDHANYARAMoDEORIoR/OoKOPOWoPATHARoDEORIGAON P.O.-CHAPAKHOWAoP.S.-CHAPAKHOWAoPIN-786157oDIST-TINSUKIAoASSAM 17:oMISSoRUPALIoGOGOI D/OoHILESWARoGOGOIoR/OoTUPSINGAoGAONoP.O.-CHAPAKHOWA P.S.-CHAPAKHOWAo(SADIYA)oPIN-786157oDIST-TINSUKIAoASSAM 18:oMISSoSUMIRPRABHAoGOGOI D/OoLATEoBIJOYRAMoGOGOIoR/OoULLOWANIoBAJALoGAON P.O.-SADIYAoP.S.-SADIYAoPIN-786155oDIST-TINSUKIAoASSAM 19:oSUMALoSARKAR S/OoSRIoSUNAMONIoSARKARoR/OoBICHANIMUKHoKHERBARI P.O.-AROIMURIAo(DHOLLA)oP.S.-SAIKHOWAoGHATo(DHOLLA) PIN-786154oDIST-TINSUKIAoASSAM 20:oSMT.oPRANATIoBARUAH D/OoLATEoGOHINoBARUAHoR/OoPANITOLAoGAONo(BORDUBIoROAD) P.O.-TINSUKIAoPANITULAoP.S.-TINSUKIAoPIN-786183oDIST-TINSUKIAo ASSAM Page No.# 3/5 21: SMT. JUNU DEORI D/O KULA NATH DEORI R/O 2 NO. MOHANG BORDUMSA P.O.-PURANI PUKHURI P.S.-BORDUMSA PIN-786174 DIST-TINSUKIA ASSAM VERSUS 1: THE STATE OF ASSAM 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:THE DIRECTOR EDUCATION (ELEMENTARY) DEPARTMENT KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19 ASSAM 4:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER TINSUKIA ASSAM 5:THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS SADIYA CHAPAKHOWA ASSAM Linked Case : W.A. No.10160/2024 (Filing Number) KAMESWAR BORUAH AND 20 ORS VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM 4 ORS H For petitioner(s)/appellant(s) : Mr. N. Borah, Advocate For respondent(s) : Ms. K. Das, Advocate – BEFORE – HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
18.12.2024 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ) The matter come upon for consideration of the present Interlocutory Application filed on behalf of the applicants with a prayer to condone the delay of 487 days occasioned in preferring the connected writ appeal. Page No.# 4/5 Mr. N. Borah, learned Counsel appearing for the applicants has submitted that the learned Single Judge of this Court had decided a bunch of writ petitions by a common judgment and order and aggrieved with the same, some other employees, who are similarly situated to the present applicants/appellants, approached the Division Bench of this Court by way of filing WA No.188/2023 and other analogous writ appeals and the said writ appeals came to be disposed vide order dated
26.07.2024 passed by the Division Bench, whereby it was observed that in view of the subsequent decision of the State Government to consider the demand of the employees, who were, though appointed after 2005 but the recruitment process in respect of the concerned posts had started prior to January, 2005, it would be appropriate to dispose of the appeals awaiting the decision of the State Government on this issue. The Division Bench had also made it clear that if the appellants failed to get any favourable decision from the State Government, they would be free to approach this Court by filing fresh writ petitions. The Division Bench also directed the State Government to take a decision expeditiously, preferably, within a period of 6(six) months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the cases of the present applicants are similar to the appellants in writ appeal in WA No.188/2023 and analogous writ appeals. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent State is not in a position to dispute the said factual position. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. In the order dated 26.07.2024, the Division Bench held as under: "In view of the above development, we are of the view that once the State Government has decided to consider the demand of the employees, who were though appointed after 2005 wherein, the recruitment process of the concerned posts were started prior to January, 2005, despite the order passed by the learned Single Judge, it would be appropriate to dispose of these appeals, awaiting the decision of the State Government on this issue. It is made Page No.# 5/5 clear that if the appellants failed to get any favourable decision from the State Government, they are free to approach this Court again by filing fresh writ appeals. We hope that the Government shall take a decision expeditiously, preferably within a period of 6 (six) months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order." Having taken into consideration the above facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that the delay of 487 days, occasioned in filing the connected writ appeal, is liable to be condoned. Hence, the present application is allowed and the delay of 487 days in filing the connected writ appeal is condoned. Registry is directed to register the connected writ appeal immediately. Having taken note of the above facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that the connected writ appeal, preferred on behalf of the applicants, is liable to be disposed of in terms of the order dated 26.07.2024 passed by the Division Bench in WA No.188/2023 and other analogous writ appeals. We hereby order that after registration of the connected writ appeal, the same be treated as disposed of in terms of the order dated 26.07.2024 passed by the Division Bench in WA No.188/2023 and other analogous writ appeals. However, it is made clear that the time period of 6 (six) months, granted by this Court vide order dated 26.07.2024 passed in WA No.188/2023 and other analogous writ appeals, shall start in the case of the present applicants from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.