- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 8 December 2024
- Bench
- Manash Ranjan Pathak
- Case no.
- AB 2837/2024
Judgment
ORDER
09.12.2024 Heard Mr. Z Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K K Parashar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State.
¶2The petitioner, namely, Masudul Hasan Akand @ Masud SK, son of Roshan Jelal, resident of village-Khopati Bazar, P.S.-Sukcahr, District-South Salmara Mankachar, an FIR named accused in Sukchar Police Station Case No. 41/2024 registered under Sections 354(D)/366/376(3) of IPC read with Section 4 of the POCSO Act, has filed this pre-arrest bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksaha Sanhita, 2023.
¶3Section 438 CrPC relates to "Direction for grant of bail to person apprehending arrest" and Section 438(4) CrPC provides that – Nothing in this section shall apply to any case involving the arrest of any person on accusation of having committed an offence under sub-section (3) of section 376 or section 376AB or section 376DA or section 376DB of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).
¶4Section 438(4) of CrPC is equivalent to Section 482(4) of BNS, 2023.
¶5Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 provides for "Direction for grant of bail to person apprehending arrest" and Section 482(4) BNSS stipulates that – Nothing in this section shall apply to any case involving the arrest of any person on accusation of having committed an offence under Section 65 and sub-section (2) of Section 70 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
¶6Section 376 IPC is equivalent to Section 65 of BNS, 2023.
¶7Said Sukchar Police Station Case No. 41/2024 against the petitioner relates to Section 376(3) IPC.
¶8As such, this pre-arrest bail application of the petitioner, named above, in Sukchar Police Station Case No. 41/2024, being not maintainable, stands dismissed. Page No.# 3/3
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010222212024 ooooooo 2024:GAU-AS:12437 ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/2837/2024o MASUDULoHASANoAKANDo@oMASUDoSKo S/OoROSHANoJELALo R/OoVILL-oKHOPATIoBAZAR,o P.S.oSUKCHAR,oDIST.oSOUTHoSALMARAoMANKACHAR,oASSAM VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDoANR.o REPoBYoTHEoPP,oASSAM 2:JELALoHUSSAIN oS/OoTOMSERoALIo R/OoVILL-oTATIPARAo(NEARoKHOPATIoBAZAR) oP.S.oSUKCHAR o DIST.oSOUTHoSALMARAoMANKACHAR oASSAM o PIN-78312o AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMRoZoHUSSAIN,oMRoAoKoDAS,MR.oRASHIDULoISLAMo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAM,oMR.oToSKo(INFORMANT)oo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.