- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 8 December 2024
- Bench
- Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- AB 3053/2024
Judgment
ORDER
09.12.2024 Heard learned counsel, Ms T Som, for the petitioner, Ikram Hussain, who has filed this application under Section 482 CrPC, with prayer for pre-arrest bail as he is apprehending arrest in connection with Bharalumukh PS Case No. 353/2023, under Sections 120(B)/395 IPC, read with Section 25-(I-A) of the Arms Act.
¶2Heard Mr R R Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Page No.# 2/4 Assam.
¶3I have considered the submissions at the Bar.
¶4It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that although the petitioner is booked under the Arms Act, the petitioner is not complicit as he was not the perpetrator, who used arms to commit dacoity.
¶5It is submitted that no overt act has been attributed to the petitioner.
¶6The FIR unfolds that a Police Team made by SI Mobarak Ali and SI Anurag Bora of Bharalumukh Police Station, accompanied by some civilians, namely, Khairul Haque, Biki Ali, Sarif Tanwar and Sonu Ali, on 21.11.2023, at about 09:00 pm, conducted a raid in the rented house of Suno Sharma at Athgaon and recovered cash of Rs. 1,69,70000/- (Rupees One Crore Sixty-Nine Lacs Seventy Thousand) from two persons, namely, Debkaran Sen and Manoj Kumar, both from Rajasthan, vide Bharalumukh PS GDE No. 32, dated 21.11.2023. This cash and the two persons, namely, Debkaran Sen and Manoj Kumar were handed over to the officials of the Income Tax Department after following due procedure. However, from confidential sources, it was uncovered that the Police personnel and the civilians looted a bag containing huge amount of cash from the place of occurrence, by threatening and assaulting the inmates in the place of occurrence with their service weapons. Only a part of the money recovered from the above two persons from Rajasthan, was handed over to the Government officials, which resulted in seizure of lesser amount of money found from the rented house of Sano Sharma. Page No.# 3/4
6.1. On receiving the secret information, an enquiry was conducted by the informant under the direction of the DCP, West Guwahati, and it was unearthed that the two Police personnel along with the civilians hatched up a conspiracy for looting the cash from the place of occurrence. During enquiry, one Khairul Haque was picked up and interrogated in the morning of 30.11.2023. During interrogation, Khairul Haque confessed about his involvement in looting the money along with the Police personnel and he stated that the Police personnel, SI (P) Mobarak Ali and SI (P) Anurag Bora, one Reporter, namely, Toufique Ahmed, along with other civilians, namely, Biki Ali, Sarif Tanwar and Sonu Ali, hatched up a conspiracy to conduct raid in the rented house, where a huge amount of cash was stored. The two Police personnel along with Biki Ali, Sonu Ali and Khairul Haque in the pretext of a Police raid, entered into the room occupied by Debkaran Sen and Manoj Kumar of Rajasthan and conducted a search operation ad took away a bag filled with cash.
6.2. During investigation, it was unearthed that Rs. 7,30,000/- was recovered from the house of Khairul Haque. Rs. 17,50,000/- was recovered from the house of one Rasiye Begum, as led by SI(P) Mobarak Ali, which was kept concealed by SI(P) Mobarak Ali in Rasiye Begum's house. Rs. 9,00,000/- was recovered from the possession of Nazmul Khan (Little Khan) and Rs. 4,00,000/- was recovered from the possession of Toufique Ahmed. During interrogation, the accused Sarif Tanwar and SI(P) Anurag Bora, also confessed of being in possession of Rs. 7.5 lacs and Rs. 5 lacs, respectively. Page No.# 4/4
¶7I have considered the submission that the petitioner is willing to cooperate with the investigation.
¶8It is also submitted at the Bar that investigation has been dragging as all the accused could not be apprehended and as the petitioner is willing to cooperate with the investigation, he may be granted bail.
¶9Considering all aspects, I deem it appropriate to direct the petitioner to appear before the Elaka Magistrate/jurisdictional Court, and apply for bail, which may be considered by the Court, in accordance with law.
¶10Anticipatory Bail Application stands disposed of.
¶11Send back the Case Diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010230802024 2024:GAU-AS:12419 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/3053/2024 IKRAM HUSSAIN S/O LATE IKBAL HUSSAIN R/O SANIPUR, MASJID ROAD, GUWAHATI-781009, P.S. BHARALUMUKH, DIST. KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. T SOM, MR H DAS,MS. U HAZARIKA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.