- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 1 December 2024
- Bench
- Manash Ranjan Pathak
- Case no.
- AB 2330/2024
Judgment
ORDER 02-12-2024 Heard Mr. S Nawaz, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K K Parashar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State. Also heard Mr. N Kalita, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2/informant.
¶2On instruction of the petitioner, his counsel, Mr. S Nawaz, is not pressing this pre-arrest bail application filed by the petitioner, namely, Amdadul Hoque @ Anzar Ali, in POCSO Case No. 43/2019 arising out of Khatkhati P.S. Case No. 109/2017 pending in the Court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge cum Special Judge (POCSO), Karbi Anglong, stating that he shall approach the appropriate forum seeking necessary relief.
¶3Accordingly, this pre-arrest bail application, being not pressed, stands dismissed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010179282024 ooooooo 2024:GAU-AS:12128 ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/2330/2024o AMDADULoHOQUEo@oANZARoALIo S/OoABDULoKADIR,o R/OoVILL-oSALKATHIoPATHAR,o P.S.oDHINGo DIST.oNAGAON,oASSAM VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDoANR.o TOoBEoREPoBYoTHEoLEARNEDoPP,oASSAM 2:PYARAoBEGUM oW/OoMD.oSAHARoALIo R/OoVILL-oDUDUoCOLONY o P.S.oKHATKHATI oINoTHEoKARBIoANGLONGoDISTRICToOFoASSAo AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMRoSARFRAZoNAWAZ,oSAMIMoRAHMAN,MRoSoAo BARBHUYAN,MSoSURAYAoRAHMAN,MRoAoWoAMAN,MR.oSURAJIToDASo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAM,oMRoNoKALITAo(R-2)oo Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.