VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Dr Nabo Kumar Pegu @ Naba Pegu v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
25 November 2024
Bench
Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
AB 1344/2024

Judgment

ORDER

26.11.2024 Heard Mr B Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner, Dr Nabo Kumar Pegu @ Naba Pegu.

¶2The petitioner has filed this application under Section 438 CrPC, with prayer for pre-arrest bail, as he is apprehending arrest in connection with Silapathar PS Case No. Page No.# 2/3 84/2024, under Sections 468/471/409/345B/447/427/ 506/511/34 IPC.

¶3Heard Mr R R Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.

¶4The allegation against the present petitioner and his co-accused is that the complainant's husband mortgaged 4 Bighas of land to the accused No. 5, but the accused No. 5, who was cultivating the land for several years got the land transferred in the name of accused No. 2 and accused No. 5, through forged documents. Later on, after the death of complainant's husband, the present petitioner and the accused No. 2, with the assistance of accused No. 3, forcefully encroached into the land and property of the complainant. The complainant who was unaware about the forgery built a warehouse on the said land and planted trees and erected a bamboo fence. On 17.03.2024, the accused No. 2, armed with a dao entered in the complainant's premises. Thereafter, the petitioner and the co-accused attacked the complainant.

¶5It is submitted at the Bar that the petitioner is a Principal of Jengraimukh College, Majuli. It is also submitted that the petitioner is an elderly person and he is 54 years old. The allegations made against him are totally false. The allegation of assault is mainly against the other accused persons.

¶6I have considered the submissions made at the Bar with circumspection.

¶7I have also scrutinized the Case Diary.

¶8The petitioner has appeared before the IO and has cooperated with the Page No.# 3/3 investigation.

¶9The petitioner is a local resident and he is not a flight risk.

¶10The petitioner is willing to abide by any stringent conditions, if imposed upon him. The petitioner has not violated the bail conditions.

¶11In view of my foregoing discussions, interim pre-arrest bail order dated

27.05.2024, is hereby made absolute, under the same terms and conditions.

¶12Anticipatory Bail Application stands disposed of.

¶13Send back the Case Diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010098842024 2024:GAU-AS:11688 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1344/2024 DR NABO KUMAR PEGU @ NABA PEGU S/O LATE RAGHUNATH PEGU, R/O SOCIETY, WARD NO. 11, SILAPATHAR TOWN, P.O. AND P.S.-SILAPATHAR, DIST-DHEMAJI, ASSAM, PIN-787059. P/R/A JENGRAIMUKH, P.O. AND P.S.-JENGRAIMUKH, DIST- MAJULI, PIN- 785105 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J C GOGOI, MR B ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.