Vikas Yadav @ Arun Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Court No. - 7 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13312 of 2024 Applicant :- Vikas Yadav @ Arun Kumar Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Ran Vijay Yadav,Durga Prasad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶2It is argued by the counsel for the applicant that the co-accused has already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 29.11.2021, as such, the applicant may also be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity.

¶3Learned A.G.A. opposed the bail prayer but could not dispute the parity.

¶4Considering and adopting the same reasoning as contained in the order dated 29.11.2021, whereby the co-accused has been enlarged, the applicant who has no criminal history is enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶5Let the applicant Vikas Yadav @ Arun Kumar Yadav be released on bail in FIR/ Case Crime No. 0127 of 2018, under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, Police Station Hazratganj, District Lucknow, on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police ofÏcer or tamper with the evidence. Order Date :- 20.12.2024 Arun High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench