Shivanshu Nishad v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 238 of 2024 Applicant :- Shivanshu Nishad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Prashant Vikram Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶1Shri Anil Kumar Tripathi, Advocate has filed Power on behalf of opposite party no.2 and the same is taken on record.

¶2Heard Shri Prashant Vikram Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and Shri Anil Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for opposite party no.2.

¶3As per learned counsel for the applicant, the present applicant has been falsely implicated in the case as he has not committed any offence as alleged in FIR No.304 of 2024, under Sections 191(2), 103(1), 333 of the B.N.S.S., Police Station Unchahar, District Rae Bareli.

¶4Since the offence in question is of murder, therefore, if the applicant is having his pleas and grounds convincing the Court that he may get relief, he may file regular bail application before the Court concerned inasmuch as, on such application the anticipatory bail of the applicant may not be considered.

¶5Therefore, without entering into merits of the case, this anticipatory bail application is disposed of at the admission stage giving liberty to the applicant to appear/ surrender before the Court concerned, within a period of three weeks from today, taking all pleas and grounds, which are available to him and file his regular bail and if the same is filed, the same shall be disposed of finally by the Court concerned expeditiously, and without giving any unnecessary adjournments to any of the parties. (Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.) Order Date :- 19.12.2024 Arnima High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench