- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 19 December 2024
- Bench
- Rajan Roy, Brij Raj Singh
- Case no.
- WRIC 10883/2024
Judgment
Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10883 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ram Shankar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Prakash Dwivedi,Ashok Kumar Pandey,Manish Kumar Shrivastav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy, J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J.
¶1Heard Sri Manish Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State-opposite parties no.1 to 5 and Sri Suresh Chandra, learned counsel who has filed power on behalf of opposite party no.6, which is taken on record.
¶2Essentially, the dispute is between the petitioner and opposite party no.6. The remedy for the petitioner is under civil/revenue/criminal law as the case may be, but not under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. If the grievance is with regard to any illegal interference by the police authorities, the petitioner may approach the higher authorities in this regard. The police authorities cannot interfere unless there is a law and order problem, apprehension of breach of peace or commission of any crime or any other valid ground for interference in law, if it is so. The police authorities shall keep their hands off from the dispute aforesaid subject to what has been stated herein-above. However, learned Standing Counsel says that police is not interfering in the matter. .
¶3Writ petition is disposed of. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 19.12.2024 Rao/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.