- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 19 December 2024
- Bench
- Pankaj Bhatia
- Case no.
- CMRA 122/2024
Judgment
Court No. - 7 Case :- CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 122 of 2024 Applicant :- Dileep Kumar @ Dilip Kumar Opposite Party :- Sandhya Yadav Counsel for Applicant :- Paritosh Sharan Agrawal,Sartaj Ali Ansari Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
¶1Heard the counsel for the applicant.
¶2The application has been filed seeking review of the order dated 11.11.2024 wherein the proceedings were transferred to from Lucknow to District Mau.
¶3The submission of the counsel for the applicant is that in the proceedings initiated at the behest of the wife at Mau under section 125 Cr.P.C., she is not appearing. It is further argued that the applicant, apprehends that in case he goes to Mau, he may suffer consequences and there being nobody to look after him.
¶4Both the reasoning, as argued by the counsel for the applicant, cannot be a ground for review of the order dated
11.11.2024. The said order was passed solely considering the convenience of the wife.
¶5No good ground is made out to review the order dated
11.11.2024.
¶6The review application is dismissed. Order Date :- 19.12.2024 VNP/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.