Mohmed Ibrar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko and 4 Others

Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10849 of 2024 Petitioner :- Mohmed Ibrar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Purshottam Chaurasia,Ashutosh Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. (Order on C.M. Application No. Nil of 2024) Heard. An application for amendment and correction in the petition has been filed today and the same is taken on record. The Amendment application is allowed. Let necessary correction be made in the petition during course of the day. (Order on petition) The petitioner alleges illegal encroachment on his bhoomidhari land bearing Gata No.84 by the opposite party No.4 in spite of demarcation proceedings having been concluded. Let the opposite party No.3 herein look into the matter and do the needful so that bhoomidhari land of the petitioner, if it is so, is not encroached by the opposite party No.4. Learned counsel for opposite party No.4 shall also communicate our order to his client, however, if the facts as stated by the petitioner are not correct and the factual position is otherwise, then the opposite parties may inform the petitioner in writing about the such factual position. The needful shall be done by the Sub-divisional Magistrate, concerned after getting the facts verified. If nothing happens within the next one month, it shall be open for the petitioner to approach this Court again It is made clear that we have not adjudicated the claim of the petitioner, but have asked the Sub-divisional Magistrate, concerned to verify the facts and do the needful after hearing the opposite party No.4. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 19.12.2024 Gurpreet Singh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench