Mohd. Anwar and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 5 Others

Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5599 of 2024 Petitioner :- Mohd. Anwar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Maneesh Kumar Singh,Navita Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.

¶1This Court on the previous occasion had passed the following order on

26.06.2024:- "1. Heard Sri Maneesh Kr. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents No. 1 to 3.

¶2The dispute raised by the petitioners in the present case is with regard to the property situated at old Khasra No. 1115, Mauja Dostpur, Pargana & Tehsil Kadipur, District Sultanpur.

¶3It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the property dispute is pending at the appellate stage in the Court of Additional District Judge, Court No.13, Sultanpur. In paragraphs No. 12 and 13, it has been stated that the respondent No.6 had approached the petitioners and threatened them to cut down the standing trees of the said property.

¶4The allegations are serious and accordingly, learned Standing Counsel is directed to seek instructions with regard to the allegations levelled in paragraphs No. 12 & 13 of the writ petition by the next date of listing.

¶5List this case on 28.6.2024. "

¶2In compliance of the order of this Court, learned Standing Counsel has received written instructions from the Inspector Crime, Police Station-Dostpur, District-Sultanpur, wherein in paragraph No. 12 to 14, it is administered that no action has been taken by the concerned inspector with regard to the dispute in question and there is no proposal with regard to the cutting of trees on the disputed property. A copy of the instructions filed today is taken on record.

¶3On recording of the aforesaid instructions, in the present case, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance of the petitioners has been substantially addressed and no further grievance subsists for the adjudication. In the light of the said submission, the petition is dismissed. Consigned to record. (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, J.) (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 28.6.2024/Raj High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench