VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2024 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jhagroo and 6 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. and 16 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
26 June 2024
Bench
Alok Mathur, Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
Case no.
5542/2024

Judgment

Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5542 of 2024 Petitioner :- Jhagroo And 6 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 16 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Chandra Tewari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.

¶1Heard Sri D.C. Tewari, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and Sri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for respondent No. 5.

¶2In light of the proposed order, notices to private respondents are dispensed with.

¶3Present dispute pertains to Gata No. 301M situated at Village Mahru Murtiha, Tehsil - Jamunaha, District Shravasti, the patta which was granted in favour of petitioner in the year 2000 and subsequently the petitioners were declared as Bhumidhar in 2019.

¶4The grievance raised by the petitioners by means of present writ petition is that the land which was allotted in favour of petitioners were declared to be surplus under the provisions of Imposition of Ceilings on Land Holding Act, 1960. The recorded tenure holder of the said land have filed a writ petition before this Court being Writ C No. 3000096 of 2002 where it has been clarified by this Court by means of order dated

29.05.2023 that no stay order has been granted in favour of petitioners and despite the aforesaid order, the possession of the said land has not been given to the petitioners.

¶5Learned counsel for petitioners has submitted that the grievance of the petitioners shall be substantially redressed in case competent authority is directed to hand over the possession of the said land to the petitioners and decide their representation accordingly.

¶6Learned counsel for respondents does not object to the said limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioners.

¶7Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No. 3/Assistant Collector / Sub Divisional Officer, Jamunah, District - Shravasti to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 09.05.2024 (Annexure No. 5) in accordance with law, expeditiously, say within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 26.6.2024 Ravi/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.