VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2024 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rangi Lal v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. and Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
26 June 2024
Bench
Alok Mathur, Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
Case no.
WRIC 5536/2024

Judgment

Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5536 of 2024 Petitioner :- Rangi Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shilpi Tiwari,Suresh Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.

¶1Heard Sri S.C. Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondents No. 1 to 4 and Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for respondent No.5.

¶2In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with.

¶3The present dispute pertains to partition of the property at Gata No. 111-Ka, area 0.02 hectares, situated at Harkipur, Pargana Daulatpur, District Sultanpur with regard to which a case under Section 30(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was filed by the petitioner which has already been decided by means of the order dated 5.1.2024 and a preliminary decree as well as forum has been prepared by the Additional Collector (Administration), Sultanpur.

¶4The grievance of the petitioner is that despite passing of the said order the same has not been executed and the private respondents on the other hand are raising constructions.

¶5Learned counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, have opposed the writ petition and submits that once the preliminary decree has been passed, only execution of the said order remains and in this regard a revenue team was constituted, but it is only due to actions of the petitioner that the order could not be executed on the spot. It is further submitted that the preliminary decree shall be executed shortly. Even otherwise, it was stated that the petitioner has an efficacious remedy under para 460 of the Revenue Court Manual for executing the order of the revenue authorities.

¶6In the light of aforesaid submission, considering that a revenue team has been constituted to execute the preliminary decree and the application of the petitioner made to the S.D.M., Tehsil Sadar, Sultanpur is pending consideration, it shall be open for the revenue authorities to execute the preliminary decree dated 5.1.2024 within next four weeks.

¶7The petitioner undertakes to cooperated with the revenue team during the aforesaid exercise. A liberty is also granted to the petitioner that in case the order is not executed within the time prescribed, he shall move an appropriate application under para 460 of the Revenue Court Manual for execution of the same.

¶8In the light of aforesaid direction, the petition is disposed of. (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J) (Alok Mathur,J.) Order Date :- 26.6.2024 Vandana High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.