VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2024 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mohammad Baks v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. , Deptt. of Urban Development , U.P. Lko. and Another

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
25 June 2024
Bench
Alok Mathur, Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
Case no.
5563/2024

Judgment

Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5563 of 2024 Petitioner :- Mohammad Baks Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. , Deptt. Of Urban Development , U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Singh,Abhishesh Kumar Prajapati Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Puspendra Kumar Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Puspendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for Nagar Palika Parishad and learned Standing Counsel for State.

¶2Petitioner has approached this Court challenging the notice dated 10.06.2024 issued by the Nagar Palika Parishad, Pihani, District Hardoi.

¶3Learned counsel for petitioner states that though the letter is titled as notice but it passes final order requiring petitioner to remove his constructions. Learned counsel for petitioner further submits that there is no illegality in possession of land petitioner and his construction.

¶4Sri Puspendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent Nagar Palika Parishad states that petitioner may submit his objections/reply to the impugned notice dated 10.06.2024 before respondent no.2 Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Pihani, District-Hardoi and the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶5The aforesaid statement of learned counsel for Nagar Palika Parishad is taken on record.

¶6In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner is permitted to file his objections/reply to the notice dated 10.06.2024 before respondent no.2 within a period of two weeks from today. In case such an objection/reply is filed, respondent no.2 shall consider and pass appropriate orders on the same expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶7Till final orders are passed by respondent no.2 on objections of petitioner, no coercive action shall be taken against petitioner.

¶8With the aforesaid observations the writ petition is disposed of. (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J) (Alok Mathur,J.) Order Date :- 25.6.2024 Vandana High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.