Hariom v. Tehsildar, Tehsil Rudauli Distt. Ayodhya. and 5 Others

Court No. - 18 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6454 of 2023 Petitioner :- Hariom Respondent :- Tehsildar, Tehsil Rudauli Distt. Ayodhya. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nisha Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.

¶1Learned standing counsel for the State has pointed out the the Consolidation proceedings has already been reached to an end thus, further, the proceedings before the Consolidation Officer are not maintainable and thus, this petition is not maintainable at this ground alone.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application under section 24 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 is also instituted by the private respondents and if, the present petitioner is not permitted to press his application, then private respondents may also be restrained from pressing his petition under section 24 after publication of section 52 of Act, 1953, before the authority concerned.

¶3In view of the aforesaid submissions, this Court finds no merit in the case thus, this petition is dismissed.

¶4Consigned to records.

¶5Interim order if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 22.12.2023 Mayank High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench