Khushunuma v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Basic Education Lucknow and 2 Others

Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9927 of 2023 Petitioner :- Khushunuma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Education Lucknow And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Awasthi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no.1 and 2, and Sri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.3.

¶2With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length states that against the order impugned dated 10.01.2023, a copy of which is Annexure-5 to the writ petition, per which, according to the petitioner, her gratuity has been calculated wrongly, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation indicating the faults in the order impugned and that the competent authority be required to decide the said representation in accordance with law within a specified time.

¶4To the aforesaid prayer, learned counsels appearing for the respondents have no objection.

¶5In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.3 then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order.

¶6With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off.

¶7It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 22.12.2023 A. Katiyar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench