VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shrimati Foolmati v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home, Lucknow and Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
16 December 2023
Bench
Manjive Shuklaauthor
Case no.
6277/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 21 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6277 of 2023 Petitioner :- Shrimati Foolmati Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home, Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deepak Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondents No. 1 and 2.

¶2In view of proposed order, notice to Respondent No. 3 is dispensed with.

¶3Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that initially petitioner filed a case under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 which was decided vide order dated

9.12.2020. It has further been submitted that against the order dated 9.12.2020, Respondent No. 3 has filed an appeal under Section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 which has been registered as Appeal No. 104 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. C202110000000104 (Mahadev Vs. Shrimati Foolmati & Others).

¶4Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has argued that aforesaid appeal was filed in the year 2021 but till date, it has not been decided by the Respondent No. 2.

¶5Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has also invited attention of this court towards Rule 183 (4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 wherein it has been provided that appeals are to be decided within a period of six months.

¶6I have considered the submissions advanced by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and I find that appeal filed by the Respondent No. 3 under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending before Additional Commissioner (Administration), Lucknow Division, Lucknow.

¶7This court further finds that under Rule 183 (4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, there is categorical provision that appeals are to be decided within a period of six months. In-spite of there being categorical provision, appeal has not been decided till date.

¶8In view of the aforesaid reasons, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Respondent No. 2 to decide the Appeal No. 104 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. C202110000000104 expeditiously preferably within a period of four months from the date of service of certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 16.12.2023 A. Mandhani High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.